Angiographic and clinical outcomes after implantation of drug eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with crush or kissing stent technique

Journal of Interventional Cardiology

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 145-152

  Cheema, Asim N ^a   Jolly, Sanjit S ^a   Burstein, Jason M ^a   Sharieff, Waseem ^b   Mohammad, Atif ^a   Yeoh, Eunice ^c   Mancini, G B John ^c   Cantor, Warren J ^a   Kutryk, Michael J B ^a   Strauss, Bradley H ^a,d   Chisholm, Robert J ^a  

^a ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^b HAMILTON GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c VANCOUVER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PACLITAXEL; RAPAMYCIN;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY BIFURCATION LESION; CRUSH STENT TECHNIQUE; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FEMALE; FINAL KISSING BALLOON DILATATION; FOLLOW UP; HEART DISEASE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; KISSING STENT TECHNIQUE; LEFT CORONARY ARTERY; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESTENOSIS; REVASCULARIZATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY VESSELS; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REGISTRIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84876055816     PISSN: 08964327     EISSN: 15408183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2013.12022.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Al Suwaidi J, Berger PB, Rihal CS, et al. Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35 (4): 929-936.
2. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: The British Bifurcation Coronary Study: Old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010; 121 (10): 1235-1243.
3. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006; 114 (18): 1955-1961.
4. Moussa ID., Coronary artery bifurcation interventions: The disconnect between randomized clinical trials and patient centered decision-making. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77 (4): 537-545.
5. Movahed MR., Major limitations of randomized clinical trials involving coronary artery bifurcation interventions: Time for redesigning clinical trials by involving only true bifurcation lesions and using appropriate bifurcation classification. J Interv Cardiol 2011; 24 (4): 295-301.
6. Colombo A, Stankovic G, Orlic D, et al. Modified T-stenting technique with crushing for bifurcation lesions: Immediate results and 30-day outcome. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003; 60 (2): 145-151.
7. Sharma SK., Simultaneous kissing drug-eluting stent technique for percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in large-size vessels. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2005; 65 (1): 10-16.
8. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M., A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006; 59 (2): 183.
9. Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials: A case for standardized definitions. Circulation 2007; 115 (17): 2344-2351.
10. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations: The CACTUS (Coronary Bifurcations: Application of the Crushing Technique Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stents) Study. Circulation 2009; 119 (1): 71-78.
11. Erglis A, Kumsars I, Niemela M, et al. Randomized comparison of coronary bifurcation stenting with the crush versus the culotte technique using sirolimus eluting stents: The Nordic stent technique study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2 (1): 27-34.
12. Ge L, Airoldi F, Iakovou I, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of drug-eluting stents in bifurcation lesions with the crush stent technique: Importance of final kissing balloon post-dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46 (4): 613-620.
13. Koo BK, Waseda K, Kang HJ, et al. Anatomic and functional evaluation of bifurcation lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3 (2): 113-119.
14. Koo BK, Park KW, Kang HJ, et al. Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2008; 29 (6): 726-732.
15. Sarno G, Garg S, Onuma Y, et al. Bifurcation lesions: Functional assessment by fractional flow reserve vs. anatomical assessment using conventional and dedicated bifurcation quantitative coronary angiogram. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76 (6): 817-823.
16. Valgimigli M, Malagutti P, Rodriguez Granillo GA, et al. Single-vessel versus bifurcation stenting for the treatment of distal left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stenting era. Clinical and angiographic insights into the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) and Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registries. Am Heart J 2006; 152 (5): 896-902.
17. Kim WJ, Kim YH, Park DW, et al. Comparison of single- versus two-stent techniques in treatment of unprotected left main coronary bifurcation disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 77 (6): 775-782.
18. Hoye A, Iakovou I, Ge L, et al. Long-term outcomes after stenting of bifurcation lesions with the "crush" technique: Predictors of an adverse outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 47 (10): 1949-1958.