Coronary artery bifurcation interventions: The disconnect between randomized clinical trials and patient centered decision-making

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 537-545

  Moussa, Issam D ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Angiography coronary; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Restenosis

Indexed keywords

CORONARY ARTERY BIFURCATION LESION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY RESTENOSIS; CORONARY THROMBOSIS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENTS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952207938     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22865     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG, et al. Bifurcation lesions: Two stents versus one stent: Immediate and follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1145-1151. (Pubitemid 30206888)
2. Al Suwaidi J, Berger PB, Rihal CS, et al. Immediate and long-term outcome of intracoronary stent implantation for true bifurcation lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:929-936. (Pubitemid 30189924)
3. Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, et al. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: Classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000;49:274-283. (Pubitemid 30133517)
4. Costa RA, Moussa I. Percutaneous treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions in the era of drug-eluting stents. Minerva Cardioangiol 2006;54:577-589. (Pubitemid 44702088)
5. Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, et al. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: A randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J 2004;148:857-864.
6. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004;109:1244-1249. (Pubitemid 38372783)
7. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, et al. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: The Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006;114:1955-1961. (Pubitemid 44665390)
8. Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, et al. Randomized trial on routine vs. provisional T-stenting in the treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J 2008;29:2859-2867.
9. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Saccà S, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side-branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations. The CACTUS (coronary bifurcations: application of the crushing technique using sirolimus-eluting stents) study. Circulation 2009;119:71-78.
10. Hildick-Smith D, de Belder AJ, Cooter N, et al. Randomized trial of simple versus complex drug-eluting stenting for bifurcation lesions: The British bifurcation coronary study: Old, new, and evolving strategies. Circulation 2010;121:1235-1243.
11. Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2006;59:183.
12. Movahed MR. Coronary artery bifurcation lesion classifications, interventional techniques, and clinical outcome. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2008;6:261-274. (Pubitemid 351372591)
13. Meier B, Gruentzig AR, King SB, et al. Risk of side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:10-14. (Pubitemid 14217499)
14. Arora RR, Raymond RE, Dimas AP, Bhadwar K, Simpfendorfer C. Side branch occlusion during coronary angioplasty: Incidence, angiographic characteristics, and outcome. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;18:210-212. (Pubitemid 20088547)
15. Chaudhry EC, Dauerman KP, Sarnoski CL, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for major bifurcation lesions using the simple approach: Risk of myocardial infarction. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2007;24:7-13. (Pubitemid 46831558)
16. Aliabadi D, Tilli FV, Bowers TR, et al. Incidence and angiographic predictors of side branch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:994-997. (Pubitemid 27459196)
17. Bhargava B, Waksman R, Lansky AJ, et al. Clinical outcomes of compromised side branch (stent jail) after coronary stenting with the NIR stent. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2001;54:295-300. (Pubitemid 33029559)
18. Paez L, Moreno R, Alcocer A, et al. Side branch occlusion during direct stent implantation. Incidence and related factors. Arch Cardiol Mex 2005;75:252-259.
19. Furukawa E, Hibi K, Kosuge M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of side branch occlusion in bifurcation lesions after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J 2005;69:325-330. (Pubitemid 40410189)
20. Gil RJ, Vassilev D, Formuszewicz R, et al. The Carina Angle-New geometrical parameter associated with periprocedural side branch compromise and the long-term results in coronary bifurcation lesions with main vessel stenting only. J Intervent Cardiol 2009;22:E1-E10.