Conversational analysis of medical discourse in rehabilitation: A study in Korea

Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 24-30

  Chang, Chulhun Ludgerus ^a,b   Park, Byung Kyu ^c   Kim, Sung Soo ^a  

^a Pusan National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^c Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Confucianism; Conversational analysis; Disability; Empathy; Korea; Medical education; Nonverbal communication; Physician communication; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMPATHY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; KOREA; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; REHABILITATION CENTER; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; VIDEORECORDING; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SPINAL CORD INJURY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; EMPATHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; KOREA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84876051453     PISSN: 10790268     EISSN: 20457723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000051     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. DiMatteo MR, Hays R. The significance of patients' perceptions of physician conduct: a study of patient satisfaction in a family practice center. J Community Health 1980;6(1):18-34. (Pubitemid 11225276)
2. DiMatteo MR, Taranta A, Friedman HS, Prince LM. Predicting patient satisfaction from physicians' nonverbal communication skills. Med Care 1980;18(4):376-87. (Pubitemid 10050305)
3. Francis V, Korsch BM, Morris MJ. Gaps in doctor-patient communication: patients' response to medical advice. N Engl J Med 1969;280(10):535-40.
4. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159(9):1563-9. (Pubitemid 35006738)
5. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients' motivation for rehabilitation. BMJ 2000;321: 1051-4.
6. Iezzoni LI, Davis RB, Soukup J, O'Day B. Quality dimensions that most concern people with physical and sensory disabilities. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:2085-92. (Pubitemid 37151252)
7. Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med 2000;50:495-506. (Pubitemid 29509735)
8. Kroll T, Beatty PW, Bingham S. Primary care satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities: the role of patient-provider communication. Manag Care Q 2003;11(1):11-9.
9. Kim SS, Park BK. Patient-perceived communication styles of physicians in rehabilitation: the effect on patient satisfaction and compliance in Korea. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2008;87(12): 998-1005.
10. Kirshblum S, Fichtenbaum J. Breaking the news in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med 2008;31(1):7-12. (Pubitemid 351838090)
11. Frankel RM. Cracking the code: theory and method in clinical communication analysis. Health Commun 2001;13(1):101-10. (Pubitemid 33600090)
12. Frankel RM. From sentence to sequence: understanding the medical encounter through microinteractional analysis. Discourse Process 1984;7(2):135-70.
13. McNeilis KS. Analyzing communication competence in medical consultations. Health Commun 2001;13(1):5-18. (Pubitemid 33600084)
14. Maynard DW, Heritage J. Conversation analysis, doctor-patient interaction and medical communication. Med Educ 2005;39(4): 428-35.
15. Roter DL, Frankel RM. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue. Soc Sci Med 1992; 34(10):1097-103.
16. Roter DL. Patient participation in the patient-provider interaction: the effects of patient question asking on the quality of interaction, satisfaction and compliance. Health Educ Monogr 1977;5(4): 281-315.
17. Stewart M, Brown JB, Boon H, Galajda J, Meredith L, Sangster M. Evidence on patient-doctor communication. Cancer Prev Control. 1999;3(1):25-30.
18. Stewart M. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995;152(9):1423-33.
19. West C. Routine complications. Troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 1984.
20. Street RL, Millay B. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Commun 2001;13(1):61-73. (Pubitemid 33600088)
21. Rimal RN. Analyzing the physician-patient interaction: an overview of six methods and future research directions. Health Commun 2001;13(1):89-99.
22. Beck RS, Daughtridge R, Sloane PD. Physician-patient communication in the primary care office: a systematic review. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002;15(1):25-38.
23. Street RL. Analyzing communication in medical consultations: do behavioural measures correspond with patients' perceptions? Med Care 1992;30:976-88.
24. Zandbelt LC, Smets EM, Oort FJ, Godfried MH, de Haes HC. Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter? Patient Educ Couns 2007;65(3):396-406. (Pubitemid 46241781)
25. Ohtaki S, Ohtaki T, Fetters MD. Doctor-patient communication: a comparison of the USA and Japan. Fam Pract 2003;20(3): 276-82. (Pubitemid 36722464)
26. Heath C. Participation in the medical consultation: the co-ordination of verbal and nonverbal behavior between the doctor and patient. Sociol Health Illn 1984;6(3):311-38.
27. Parsons T. The social system. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe; 1951.
28. Buller MK, Buller DB. Physicians' communication style and patient satisfaction. J Health Soc Behav 1987;28(4):375-88. (Pubitemid 18017784)
29. Lee SH, Han HS, Chang CH, Park BK, Kim SS. Korean college students' attitudes and preferences toward shared decisionmaking between patients and physicians. Korean J Med Ethics 2012;15(1):52-69.
30. Kim SS, Kaplowitz S, Johnston MV. The effects of physician empathy on patient satisfaction and compliance. Eval Health Prof 2004;27(3):237-51. (Pubitemid 39050604)
31. Riess H, Kelley JM, Bailey RW, Dunn EJ, Phillips M. Empathy training for resident physicians: a randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. J Gen Intern Med 2012, DOI: 10.1007/s11606-012-2063-z.