Wildlife value orientations as predicting factors in support of reintroducing bison and of wolves migrating to Germany

Journal for Nature Conservation

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 125-132

  Hermann, Nadin ^a   Voß, Christin ^a   Menzel, Susanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSNABRÜCK   (Germany)

Author keywords

Domination; Higher education; Human dimensions; Mutualism; Restoration; Values; Wildlife management

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CANID; HIGHER EDUCATION; MIGRATORY BEHAVIOR; NATURE CONSERVATION; REINTRODUCTION; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; UNGULATE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

GERMANY;

ANIMALIA; BISON; BISON BONASUS; CANIDAE;

EID: 84875948112     PISSN: 16171381     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bandura A. Social learning theory 1977, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Bjerke T., Kaltenborn B.P. The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1999, 19(4):415-421.
3. BMU - Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit. (2007). Nationale Strategie zur Biologischen Vielfalt. Berlin: Eigenverlag.
4. Bright A.D., Manfredo M.J., Fulton D.C. Segmenting the public: An application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2000, 28(1):218-226.
5. Czech B., Devers P.K., Krausman P.R. The relationship of gender to species conservation attitudes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2001, 29(1):187-194.
6. Decker S.E., Bath A.J., Simms A., Lindner U., Reisinger E. The return of the king or bringing snails to the garden? The human dimensions of a proposed restoration of European bison (Bison bonasus) in Germany. Restoration Ecology 2010, 18(1):41-51.
7. Dervişoĝlu S. Wildlife value orientations of university students. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 2010, 6(6):593-598.
8. Dougherty E.M., Fulton D.C., Anderson D.H. The influence of gender on the relationship between wildlife value orientations, beliefs, and the acceptability of lethal deer control in Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Society & Natural Resources 2003, 16(7):603-623.
9. Ewert A., Baker D. Standing for where you sit: An exploratory analysis of the relationship between academic major and environment beliefs. Environment and Behavior 2001, 33(5):687-707.
10. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, http://www.people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html Accessed 18.04.11.
11. Fulton D.C., Manfredo M.J., Lipscomb J. Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1996, 1(2):24-47.
12. Gross M. Return of the wolf: Ecological restoration and the deliberate inclusion of the unexpected. Environmental Politics 2008, 17(1):115-120.
13. Haupt, H., Ludwig, G., Gruttke, H., Binot-Hafke, M., Otto, C., & Pauly, A. (Red.) (2009). Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere, Pflanzen und Pilze Deutschlands. Band 1: Wirbeltiere. Bundesamt für Naturschutz: Naturschutz und biologische Vielfalt, 70(1).
14. Hodgkinson S.P., Innes J.M. The attitudinal influence of career orientation in 1st-year university students: Environmental attitudes as a function of degree choice. The Journal of Environmental Education 2001, 32(3):37-40.
15. Jacobs M.H. Wildlife value orientations in The Netherlands. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 2007, 12(5):359-365.
16. Jacobs M.H., Vaske J.J., Teel T.L., Manfredo M.J. Human dimensions of wildlife. Environmental psychology: An introduction 2012, 78-86. BPS Blackwell, West Sussex. L. Steg, A.E. van den Berg, J.I.M. de Groot (Eds.).
17. Kaczensky P. Medienpräsenz- und Akzeptanzstudie 'Wölfe in Deutschland' (Abschlussbericht) 2006, Universität Freiburg, Deutschland.
18. Kaczensky P. Wildlife value orientations of rural Mongolians. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 2007, 12(5):317-329.
19. Kaltenborn B.P., Bjerke T. The relationship of general life values to attitudes toward large carnivores. Human Ecology Review 2002, 9(1):55-61.
20. Kellert S.R. Perceptions of animals in American society. Transactions of the 41st North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference 1976, 41:533-546.
21. Kellert S.R., Berry J.K. Attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors toward wildlife as affected by gender. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1987, 15(3):363-371.
22. Kluckhohn C. Values and value orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. Toward a general theory of action 1951, 388-433. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. T. Parsons, E.A. Shils (Eds.).
23. Leong K.M. The tragedy of becoming common: Landscape change and perceptions of wildlife. Society & Natural Resources 2010, 23(2):111-127.
24. Manfredo M.J., Teel T.L., Henry K.L. Linking society and environment: A multilevel model of shifting wildlife value orientations in the Western United States. Social Science Quarterly 2009, 90(2):407-427.
25. Peyton R.B., Langenau E.E. A comparison of attitudes held by BLM biologists and the general public towards animals. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1985, 13(2):117-120.
26. Pucek Z., Belousova I.P., Krasińska M., Krasiński Z.A., Olech W. European bison status survey and conservation action plan 2004, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
27. Rokeach M. The nature of human values 1973, The Free Press, New York.
28. Schwartz S.H., Bilsky W. Toward a psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 53(3):550-562.
29. Sijtsma M.T.J., Vaske J.J., Jacobs M.H. Acceptability of lethal control of wildlife that damage agriculture in The Netherlands. Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal 2012, 10.1080/08941920.2012.684850.
30. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A. The new environmental paradigm in social psychological perspective. Environment and Behavior 1995, 27(1):723-745.
31. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Abel T., Guagnano G.A., Kalof L. A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review 1999, 6(2):81-97.
32. Stoepel B. Wölfe in Deutschland 2004, Hoffmann und Campe, Hamburg.
33. Teel T.L., Manfredo M.J., Jensen F.S., Buijs A.E., Fischer A., Riepe C., et al. Understanding the cognitive basis for human-wildlife relationships as a key to successful protected-area management. Intentional Journal of Sociology 2010, 40(3):104-123.
34. Teel T.L., Manfredo M.J. Understanding the diversity of public interests in wildlife conservation. Conservation Biology 2010, 24(1):128-139.
35. Tisdell C., Swarna Nantha H., Wilson C. Endangerment and likeability of wildlife species: How important are they for payments proposed for conservation?. Ecological Economics 2007, 60(3):627-633.
36. Tkac J. The effects of information on willingness-to-pay values of endangered species. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1998, 80(5):1214-1220.
37. Vaske J.J., Needham M.D. Segmenting public beliefs about conflict with coyotes in an urban recreation setting. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 2007, 25(4):79-98.
38. Vaske J.J., Jacobs M.H., Sijtsma M.T.J. Wildlife value orientation and demographics in The Netherlands. European Journal of Wildlife Research 2011, 10.1007/s10344-011-0531-0.
39. Zinn H.C., Pierce C.L. Values, gender, and concern about potentially dangerous wildlife. Environment and Behavior 2002, 34(2):239-256.
40. Zinn H.C., Shen X.S. Wildlife value orientations in China. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 2007, 12(5):331-338.