The influence of gender on the relationship between wildlife value orientations, beliefs, and the acceptability of lethal deer control in Cuyahoga Valley National Park

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2003, Pages 603-623

  Dougherty, Erin M ^a   Fulton, David C ^b   Anderson, Dorothy H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

Author keywords

Deer management; Gender; Wildlife values

Indexed keywords

DEER; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; GENDER DISPARITY; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

UNITED STATES;

CERVIDAE;

EID: 0041438395     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920309187     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
2. Balgooyen, C. P. 1994. Monitoring impacts of white-tailed deer: Indicators of grazing and browsing pressure on the Apostle Island and adjacent mainland. MS thesis, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
3. Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Social Psychol. 51(6):1173-1182.
4. Beutel, A. M., and M. M. Marini. 1995. Gender and values. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60:436-448.
5. Bohrnstedt, G. W., and D. Knoke. 1994. Statistics for social data analysis. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
6. Bright, A. D., M. J. Manfredo, and D. C. Fulton. 2000. Segmenting the public: an application of value orientations to wildlife planning in Colorado. Wild. Society Bull. 28(1):218-226.
7. Casey, D., and D. Hein. 1983. Effects of heavy browsing on a bird community in deciduous forest. J. Wild. Manage. 47:829-836.
8. Cohen, J., and P. Cohen. 1983. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.
9. Corraliza, J. A., and J. Berenguer. 2000. Environmental values, beliefs, and actions: A situational approach. Environ. Behav. 32(6):832-848.
10. deCalesta, D. S. 1995. Effect of white-tailed deer and silvicultural practices on herbs and shrubs in northern hardwood forests. Program and Abstracts of the 80th Annual Ecological Society of America Meeting, Snowbird, UT.
11. deCalesta, D. S., and W. J. McShea. 1994. Impacts of white-tailed deer on understory vegetation and faunal diversity in forest ecosystems of the eastern U.S. Abstracts of the First Annual Conference of the Wildlife Society, Albequerque, NM.
12. Dietz, T., P. C. Stern, and G. A. Guagnano. 1998. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environ. Behav. 30(4):450-471.
13. Dillman, D. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.
14. Dio, L. D., C. Saragovi, R. Koestner, and J. Aube. 1996. L nking personal values to gender. Sex Roles 34(9/10):621-637.
15. Fishbein, M., and M. J. Manfredo. 1992. A theory of behavior change. In Influencing human behavior: Theory and applications at recreation, tourism, and natural resources management, ed. M. J. Manfredo. 29-50. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
16. Fulton, D. C., M. J. Manfredo, and J. Lipscomb. 1996. Wildlife value orientations: A conceptual and measurement approach. Hum. Dimen. Wild. 1(2):24-47.
17. Fulton, D. C., J. Pate, and M. J. Manfredo. 1995. Colorado residents' attitudes toward trapping in Colorado. Project Report No. 23. Project Report for the Colorado Division of Wildlife. Ft. Collins: Colorado State University, Human Dimensions in Natural Resources Unit.
18. Hays, W. L. 1988. Statistics. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Kalof, L., T. Dietz, G. Guagnano, and P. C. Stern. 2002. Race, gender, and environmentalism: The atypical values and beliefs of white men. Race Gender Class. 9(2):1-19.
20. Keppel, G., and S. Zedeck. 1989. Data analysis for research designs: Analysis of variance and multiple regression/correlation approaches. New York: W. H. Freeman.
21. Lauber, T. B., M. L. Anthony, and B. A. Knuth. 2001. Gender and ethical judgements about suburban deer management. Society Nat. Resouces, 14(7):571-584.
22. Manfredo, M. J., D. C. Fulton, and C. L. Pierce. 1997. Understanding voter behavior on wildlife ballot initiatives: Colorado's trapping amendment. Hum. Dimen. Wild. 2(4):22-39.
23. Manfredo, M. J., C. L. Pierce, D. C. Fulton, J. Pate, and B. R. Gill. 1999. Public acceptance of wildlife trapping Colorado. Wild. Soc. Bull. 27(2):499-508.
24. McCarty, J. F. 1997. Deer kill proposed to cut parks' herds; controversy expected at hearings. Cleveland Plain Dealer May 19, p. 1B.
25. McShea, W. J., and J. H. Rappole. 1994. Forest understory, white-tailed deer and understory dependent species. In The science of overabundance: The ecology of unmanaged deer populations, Proceedings, Fort Royal, VA, p. 15.
26. Prince-Gibson, E., and S. H. Schwartz. 1998. Value priorities and gender. Social Psychol. Q. 61(1):49-67.
27. Seligman, C., G. J. Syme, and R. Gilchrist. 1994. The role of values and ethical principles in judgements of environmental dilemmas. J. Social Issues 50(3):105-119.
28. Stern, P. C., and T. Dietz. 1994. The value basis of environmental concern. J. Social Issues 50(3):65-84.
29. Stevens, J. 1992. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. USDI, National Park Service, Cuyahoga Valley National Park, Brecksville, OH. 1996. The effects of deer browsing on white-flowered trillium in CVNP. Unpublished.
31. Vaske, J. J., and M. P. Donnelly. 1999. A value-attitude-behavior model predicting wildland preservation voting intentions. Society Nat. Resources 12:523-537.
32. Zinn, H. C., and C. L. Pierce. 2002. Values, gender, and concern about potentially dangerous wildlife. Environ. Behav. 34:239-256.
33. Zinn, H. C., M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, and K. Wittman. 1998. Using normative beliefs to determine the acceptability of wildlife management actions. Society Nat. Resources 11:649-662.