Recognizing clinical entities in hospital discharge summaries using Structural Support Vector Machines with word representation features

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 13, Issue SUPPL1, 2013, Pages

  Tang, Buzhou ^a,b   Cao, Hongxin ^c   Wu, Yonghui ^a   Jiang, Min ^a   Xu, Hua ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AUTOMATED PATTERN RECOGNITION; CLINICAL PATHWAY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEMANTICS; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CRITICAL PATHWAYS; HUMANS; MARKOV CHAINS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING; PATIENT DISCHARGE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PENNSYLVANIA; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEMANTICS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84875945878     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S1-S1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. A general natural-language text processor for clinical radiology. Friedman C, Alderson PO, Austin JH, Cimino JJ, Johnson SB, J Am Med Inform Assoc 1994 1 161 174 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236146 7719797
2. Extracting information from textual documents in the electronic health record: a review of recent research. Meystre SM, Savova GK, Kipper-Schuler KC, Hurdle JF, Yearb Med Inform 2008 128 144 18660887
3. Experience with a mixed semantic/syntactic parser. Haug PJ, Koehler S, Lau LM, Wang P, Rocha R, Huff SM, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995 284 288 8563286
4. A natural language parsing system for encoding admitting diagnoses. Haug PJ, Christensen L, Gundersen M, Clemons B, Koehler S, Bauer K, Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1997 814 818 9357738
5. An overview of MetaMap: historical perspective and recent advances. Aronson AR, Lang FM, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 229 236 20442139
6. Development and evaluation of a clinical note section header terminology. Denny JC, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Spickard A, AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 156 160 18999303
7. Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications. Savova GK, Masanz JJ, Ogren PV, Zheng J, Sohn S, Kipper-Schuler KC, Chute CG, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 507 513 10.1136/jamia.2009.001560 20819853
8. Extracting principal diagnosis, co-morbidity and smoking status for asthma research: evaluation of a natural language processing system. Zeng QT, Goryachev S, Weiss S, Sordo M, Murphy SN, Lazarus R, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2006 6 30 10.1186/1472-6947-6-30 16872495
9. Extracting medication information from clinical text. Uzuner O, Solti I, Cadag E, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 514 518 10.1136/jamia.2010.003947 20819854
10. 2010 i2b2/VA challenge on concepts, assertions, and relations in clinical text. Uzuner O, South BR, Shen S, DuVall SL, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 552 556 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000203 21685143
11. Integrating existing natural language processing tools for medication extraction from discharge summaries. Doan S, Bastarache L, Klimkowski S, Denny JC, Xu H, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 528 531 10.1136/jamia.2010.003855 20819857
12. Medication information extraction with linguistic pattern matching and semantic rules. Spasic I, Sarafraz F, Keane JA, Nenadic G, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 532 535 10.1136/jamia.2010.003657 20819858
13. High accuracy information extraction of medication information from clinical notes: 2009 i2b2 medication extraction challenge. Patrick J, Li M, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 524 527 10.1136/jamia.2010.003939 20819856
14. Lancet: a high precision medication event extraction system for clinical text. Li Z, Liu F, Antieau L, Cao Y, Yu H, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 563 567 10.1136/jamia.2010.004077 20819865
15. Textractor: a hybrid system for medications and reason for their prescription extraction from clinical text documents. Meystre SM, Thibault J, Shen S, Hurdle JF, South BR, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010 17 559 562 10.1136/jamia.2010.004028 20819864
16. Machine-learned solutions for three stages of clinical information extraction: the state of the art at i2b2 2010. de Bruijn B, Cherry C, Kiritchenko S, Martin J, Zhu X, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 557 562 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000150 21565856
17. A study of machine-learning-based approaches to extract clinical entities and their assertions from discharge summaries. Jiang M, Chen Y, Liu M, Rosenbloom ST, Mani S, Denny JC, Xu H, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 601 606 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000163 21508414
18. Using machine learning for concept extraction on clinical documents from multiple data sources. Torii M, Wagholikar K, Liu H, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011 18 580 587 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000155 21709161
19. Conditional random fields and support vector machines for disorder named entity recognition in clinical texts. Li D, Kipper-Schuler K, Savova G, Proceedings of the Workshop on Current Trends in Biomedical Natural Language Processing Columbus, Ohio: Association for Computational Linguistics 2008 94 95 pp. 94-95
20. Extracting named entities using support vector machines. Wu Y-C, Fan T-K, Lee Y-S, Yen S-J, Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Knowledge Discovery in Life Science Literature Singapore: Springer-Verlag 2006 91 103 pp. 91-103
21. Use of support vector learning for chunk identification. Kudoh T, Matsumoto Y, Proceedings of the 2nd workshop on Learning language in logic and the 4th conference on Computational natural language learning-Volume 7 Lisbon, Portugal: Association for Computational Linguistics 2000 142 144 pp. 142-144
22. Chunking with support vector machines. Kudo T, Matsumoto Y, Proceedings of the second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Association for Computational Linguistics 2001 1 8 pp. 1-8
23. Large Margin Methods for Structured and Interdependent Output Variables. Tsochantaridis I, Joachims T, Hofmann T, Altun Y, J Mach Learn Res 2005 6 1453 1484
24. Word representations: a simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. Turian J, Ratinov L, Bengio Y, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Uppsala, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics
25. Name Tagging with Word Clusters and Discriminative Training. Miller SaG, Jethran, Zamanian, Alex, HLT-NAACL 2004 337 342 pp. 337-342
26. Word representations: a simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. Turian J, Ratinov L, Bengio Y, Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Uppsala, Sweden: Association for Computational Linguistics 2010 384 394 pp. 384-394
27. Enhancing clinical concept extraction with distributional semantics. Jonnalagadda S, Cohen T, Wu S, Gonzalez G, Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2012 45 129 140 10.1016/j.jbi.2011.10.007 22085698
28. Clinical entity recognition using structural support vector machines with rich features. Tang B, Cao H, Wu Y, Jiang M, Xu H, Proceedings of the ACM Sixth International Workshop on Data and Text Mining in Biomedical Informatics New York: ACM 2012 13 20 10.1145/2390068.2390073
29. Cutting-plane training of structural SVMs. Joachims T, Finley T, Yu C-NJ, Mach Learn 2009 77 27 59 10.1007/s10994-009-5108-8
30. Biological entity recognition with conditional random fields. He Y, Kayaalp M, AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008 293 297 18999272
31. POSBIOTM-NER: a trainable biomedical named-entity recognition system. Song Y, Kim E, Lee GG, Yi BK, Bioinformatics 2005 21 2794 2796 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti414 15814561
32. Representing text chunks. Sang EFTK, Veenstra J, Ninth Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics 1999 173 179 pp. 173-179
33. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Brown PF, deSouza PV, Mercer RL, Pietra VJD, Lai JC, Comput Linguist 1992 18 467 479
34. Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Lund K, Burgess C, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1996 28 203 208
35. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Wilcoxon F, Biometrics Bulletin 1945 1 4
36. Multi-View Learning of Word Embeddings via CCA. Dhillon PS, Foster D, Ungar L, NIPS'11 2011 199 207