A Review of Evidence on Consent Bias in Research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 42-44

  Emam, Khaled El ^a   Jonker, Elizabeth ^a   Moher, Ester ^a   Arbuckle, Luk ^a  

^a CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

BIOLOGICAL SPECIMEN BANKS; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SELECTION BIAS;

EID: 84875935407     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767958     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. El Emam, K., Dankar, F.Issa, R. 2009. A globally optimal k-anonymity method for the de-identification of health data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(5): 670-682.
2. El Emam, K., Jonker, E., Arbuckle, L. and Malin, B. 2011. A systematic review of re-identification attacks on health data. PLoS ONE, 6(12): e28071
3. Harris, A. L., Levy, A. R. and Teschke, K. E. 2008. Personal privacy and public health: Potential impacts of privacy legislation on health research in Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health,: 293-296. July-August
4. Jost, J. T. M., Banaji, R. and Nozek, B. A. 2004. A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25(6): 881-919.
5. Kho, M., Duffett, M., Willison, D., Cook, D. and Brouwers, M. 2009. Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: Systematic review. British Medical Journal, 338: b866
6. Panel on Research Ethics. 2009. Tri-Council policy statement: Ethical conduct for research involving humans. Available at: http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_WEB.pdf
7. Rimal, R. N. and Real, K. 2005. How behaviors are influenced by perceived norms: A test of the theory of normative social behavior. Communication Research, 32(3): 389-414.
8. Rothstein, M. A. and Shoben, A. B. 2013. Does consent bias research?. American Journal of Bioethics, 13(4): 27-37.
9. Sherif, M. 1936. The psychology of social norms, Oxford, England: Harper.
10. Thaler, R. H. and Sunstein, C. R. 2008. Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Wenzel, M. 2004. The social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Human Behavior, 28(5): 547-567.
12. Willison, D., Emerson, C., Szala-Meneok, K., Gibson, E., Schwartz, L. and Weisbaum, K. 2008. Access to medical records for research purposes: Varying perceptions across research ethics boards. Journal of Medical Ethics, 34: 308-314.