Prognostic impact of subclassification of radical prostatectomy positive margins by linear extent and Gleason grade

Journal of Urology

Volumn 189, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1302-1307

  Udo, Kazuma ^a   Cronin, Angel M ^a   Carlino, Lauren J ^a   Savage, Caroline J ^a   Maschino, Alexandra C ^a   Al Ahmadie, Hikmat A ^a   Gopalan, Anuradha ^a   Tickoo, Satish K ^a   Scardino, Peter T ^a,b   Eastham, James A ^a   Reuter, Victor E ^a   Fine, Samson W ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

disease progression; pathology; prognosis; prostate; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE FREE SURVIVAL; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LOG RANK TEST; MALE; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGIN LINEAR LENGTH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROGRESSION FREE SURVIVAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; TISSUES; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; DISEASE PROGRESSION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM GRADING; PROGNOSIS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84875927853     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. P.I. Karakiewicz, J.A. Eastham, M. Graefen Prognostic impact of positive surgical margins in surgically treated prostate cancer: multi-institutional assessment of 5831 patients Urology 66 2005 1245
2. A.J. Stephenson, D.P. Wood, M.W. Kattan Location, extent and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy J Urol 182 2009 1357
3. M. Sofer, K.L. Hamilton-Nelson, F. Civantos Positive surgical margins after radical retropubic prostatectomy: the influence of site and number on progression J Urol 167 2002 2453
4. J.A. Eastham, K. Kuroiwa, M. Ohori Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens Urology 70 2007 965
5. R.A. Marks, M.O. Koch, A. Lopez-Beltran The relationship between the extent of surgical margin positivity and prostate specific antigen recurrence in radical prostatectomy specimens Hum Pathol 38 2007 1207
6. A. Ochiai, T. Sotelo, P. Troncoso Natural history of biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy based on length of a positive margin Urology 71 2008 308
7. S. Shikanov, J. Song, C. Royce Length of positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy as a predictor of biochemical recurrence J Urol 182 2009 139
8. F. Brimo, A.W. Partin, J.I. Epstein Tumor grade at margins of resection in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prognosis Urology 76 2010 1206
9. D. Cao, A.S. Kibel, F. Gao The Gleason score of tumor at the margin in radical prostatectomy is predictive of biochemical recurrence Am J Surg Pathol 34 2010 994
10. D. Cao, P.A. Humphrey, F. Gao Ability of linear length of positive margin in radical prostatectomy specimens to predict biochemical recurrence Urology 77 2011 1409
11. S.W. Fine, H.A. Al-Ahmadie, A. Gopalan Anatomy of the anterior prostate and extraprostatic space: a contemporary surgical pathology analysis Adv Anat Pathol 14 2007 401
12. M. Ohori, T.M. Wheeler, M.W. Kattan Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens J Urol 54 1995 1818
13. R.J. Babaian, P. Troncoso, V.A. Bhadkamkar Analysis of clinicopathologic factors predicting outcome after radical prostatectomy Cancer 91 2001 1414
14. D.A. Barocas, M. Han, J.I. Epstein Does capsular incision at radical retropubic prostatectomy affect disease-free survival in otherwise organ-confined prostate cancer? Urology 58 2001 746
15. P. Swindle, J.A. Eastham, M. Ohori Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens J Urol 174 2005 903
16. A.Y. Chuang, M.E. Nielsen, D.J. Hernandez The significance of positive surgical margin in areas of capsular incision in otherwise organ confined disease at radical prostatectomy J Urol 178 2007 1306
17. S.F. Shariat, Y. Lotan, H. Saboorian Survivin expression is associated with features of biologically aggressive prostate carcinoma Cancer 100 2004 751
18. M. Laurila, T.L. Tammela, A. Auvinen Biological aggressiveness of prostate cancer in the Finnish screening trial Int J Cancer 124 2009 547
19. J.I. Epstein Pathologic assessment of the surgical specimen Urol Clin North Am 28 2001 567
20. L. Egevad, T. Granfors, L. Karlberg Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer BJU Int 89 2002 538
21. P.H. Tang, L. Cheng, J.R. Srigley International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on handling and staging of radical prostatectomy specimens. Working Group 5: Surgical Margins Mod Pathol 24 2011 48
22. I.M. Thompson, C.M. Tangen, J. Paradelo Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial J Urol 181 2009 956
23. T. Wiegel, D. Bottke, U. Steiner Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen J Clin Oncol 27 2009 2924