Choosing the Optimal Number of Factors in Exploratory Factor Analysis: A Model Selection Perspective

Multivariate Behavioral Research

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 28-56

  Preacher, Kristopher J ^a   Zhang, Guangjian ^b   Kim, Cheongtag ^c   Mels, Gerhard ^d  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^d Scientific Software International ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875915032     PISSN: 00273171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2012.710386     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Akaike, H. 1973. "Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle.". In Second international symposium on information theory Edited by: Petrov, B. N. and Csaki, F. 267-281. Budapest, Hungary: Akademia Kiado.
2. Akaike, H. 1987. Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52: 317-332.
3. Bandalos, D. L. 1997. Assessing sources of error in structural equation models: The effects of sample size, reliability, and model misspecification. Structural Equation Modeling, 4: 177-192.
4. Bentler, P. M. 1980. Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling. Annual Review of Psychology, 31: 419-456.
5. Bentler, P. M. and Mooijaart, A. 1989. Choice of structural model via parsimony: A rationale based on precision. Psychological Bulletin, 106: 315-317.
6. Bollen, K. A. 1989. Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
7. Box, G. E. P. 1976. Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 71: 791-799.
8. Bozdogan, H. 2000. Akaike's information criterion and recent developments in information complexity. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44: 62-91.
9. Bozdogan, H. and Ramirez, D. E. 1987. "An expert model selection approach to determine the "best" pattern structure in factor analysis models.". In Multivariate statistical modeling and data analysis Edited by: Bozdogan, H. and Gupta, A. K. 35-60. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.
10. Browne, M. W. 2000. Cross-validation methods. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44: 108-132.
11. Browne, M. W. 2001. An overview of analytic rotation in exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36: 111-150.
12. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. 1989. Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24: 445-455.
13. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. 1992. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21: 230-258.
14. Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R., Tateneni, K. and Mels, G. 2008. CEFA: Comprehensive exploratory factor analysis. Retrieved fromhttp://faculty.psy.ohio-state.edu/browne/
15. Burnham, K. P. and Anderson, D. R. 2004. Multimodel inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in model selection. Sociological Methods & Research, 33: 261-304.
16. Cattell, R. B. 1966. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1: 245-276.
17. Collyer, C. E. 1985. Comparing strong and weak models by fitting them to computer-generated data. Perception and Psychophysics, 38: 476-481.
18. Comrey, A. L. and Lee, H. B. 1992. A first course in factor analysis, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Costa, P. T. Jr. and McCrae, R. R. 1992. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4: 5-13.
20. Cudeck, R. 1991. "Comments on "Using causal models to estimate indirect effects.".". In Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions Edited by: Collins, L. M. and Horn, J. L. 260-263. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Cudeck, R. and Henly, S. J. 1991. Model selection in covariance structures analysis and the "problem" of sample size: A clarification. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 512-519.
22. Cudeck, R. and Henly, S. J. 2003. A realistic perspective on pattern representation in growth data: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8: 378-383.
23. Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Chen, F., Paxton, P. and Kirby, J. B. 2003. Finite sampling properties of the point estimates and confidence intervals of the RMSEA. Sociological Methods & Research, 32: 208-252.
24. Cutting, J. E. 2000. Accuracy, scope, and flexibility of models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44: 3-19.
25. Cutting, J. E., Bruno, N., Brady, N. P. and Moore, C. 1992. Selectivity, scope, and simplicity of models: A lesson from fitting judgments of perceived depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121: 364-381.
26. De Gooijer, J. G. 1995. Cross-validation criteria for covariance structures. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 24: 1-16.
27. Dunn, J. C. 2000. Model complexity: The fit to random data reconsidered. Psychological Research, 63: 174-182.
28. Everett, J. E. 1983. Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18: 197-218.
29. Eysenck, H. J. 1991. Dimensions of personality: 16, 5, or 3? Criteria for a taxonomic paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12: 773-790.
30. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C. and Strahan, E. J. 1999. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4: 272-299.
31. Grünwald, P. D. 2000. Model selection based on minimum description length. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44: 133-152.
32. Heskes, T. 1998. Bias/variance decomposition for likelihood-based estimators. Neural Computation, 10: 1425-1433.
33. Hu, L. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria in fix indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6: 1-55.
34. Hubbard, R. and Allen, S. J. 1989. On the number and nature of common factors extracted by the eigenvalue-one rule using BMDP vs. SPSSx. Psychological Reports, 65: 155-160.
35. Humphreys, L. G. 1964. Number of cases and number of factors: An example where N is very large. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 24: 457-466.
36. Ichikawa, M. 1988. Empirical assessments of AIC procedure for model selection in factor analysis. Behaviormetrika, 24: 33-40.
37. Jessor, R. and Jessor, S. L. 1977. Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York, NY: Academic Press.
38. Jessor, R. and Jessor, S. L. 1991. Socialization of problem behavior in youth, 1969-1981 Cambridge, MA http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/00782, UNF:3:bNvdfUO8c9YXemVwScJy/A==]. Henry A. Murray Research Archive (http://www.murray.harvard.edu/
39. Leahy, K. 1994. The overfitting problem in perspective. AI Expert, 9: 35-36.
40. Linhart, H. and Zucchini, W. 1986. Model selection. New York, NY: Wiley.
41. Lopes, H. F. and West, M. 2004. Bayesian model assessment in factor analysis. Statistica Sinica, 14: 41-67.
42. MacCallum, R. C. 2003. Working with imperfect models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38: 113-139.
43. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. and Cai, L. 2007. "Factor analysis models as approximations: Some history and some implications.". In Factor analysis at 100: Historical developments and future directions Edited by: Cudeck, R. and MacCallum, R. C. 153-175. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W. and Sugawara, H. M. 1996. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1: 130-149.
45. MacCallum, R. C. and Tucker, L. R. 1991. Representing sources of error in the common factor model: Implications for theory and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 109: 502-511.
46. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T. Jr., Bond, M. H. and Paunonen, S. V. 1996. Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70: 552-566.
47. McDonald, R. P. 1989. An index of goodness-of-fit based on noncentrality. Journal of Classification, 6: 97-103.
48. McDonald, R. P. and Marsh, H. W. 1990. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit. Psychological Bulletin, 107: 247-255.
49. Meehl, P. E. 1990. Appraising and amending theories: The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry, 1: 108-141.
50. Mulaik, S. A. 2001. The curve-fitting problem: An objectivist view. Philosophy of Science, 68: 218-241.
51. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S. and Stilwell, C. D. 1989. Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105: 430-445.
52. Muthén, L. K. and Muthén, B. O. 1998-2011. Mplus user's guide, 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
53. Myung, I. J. 2000. The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44: 190-204.
54. Myung, I. J. and Pitt, M. A. 1998. "Issues in selecting mathematical models of cognition.". In Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition Edited by: Grainger, J. and Jacobs, A. M. 327-355. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Nunnally, J. C. and Bernstein, I. H. 1994. Psychometric theory, 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
56. Pitt, M. A. and Myung, I. J. 2002. When a good fit can be bad. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6: 421-425.
57. Pitt, M. A., Myung, I. J. and Zhang, S. 2002. Toward a method of selecting among computational models of cognition. Psychological Review, 109: 472-491.
58. Platt, J. R. 1964. Strong inference. Science, 146(3642) October 16: 347-353.
59. Popper, K. R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. London, UK: Hutchinson.
60. Preacher, K. J. 2006. Quantifying parsimony in structural equation modeling. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41: 227-259.
61. Roberts, S. and Pashler, H. 2000. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychological Review, 107: 358-367.
62. Savalei, V. 2012. The relationship between RMSEA and model misspecification in CFA models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 72: 910-932.
63. Schwarz, G. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics, 6: 461-464.
64. Sclove, S. L. 1987. Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52: 333-343.
65. Song, J. and Belin, T. R. 2008. Choosing an appropriate number of factors in factor analysis with incomplete data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 52: 3560-3569.
66. Steiger, J. H. and Lind, J. C. Statistically based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychometric Society. Iowa City, IA. May.
67. Thompson, B. 1994. The pivotal role of replication in psychological research: Empirically evaluating the replicability of sample results. Journal of Personality, 62: 157-176.
68. Thurstone, L. L. 1947. Multiple-factor analysis: A development and expansion of The Vectors of the Mind. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
69. Tucker, L. R., Koopman, R. F. and Linn, R. L. 1969. Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika, 34: 421-459.
70. Wijsman, R. A. 1959. Applications of a certain representation of the Wishart matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 30: 597-601.
71. Yuan, K. and Hayashi, K. 2003. Bootstrap approach to inference and power analysis based on three test statistics for covariance structure models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 56: 93-110.
72. Zwick, W. R. and Velicer, W. F. 1986. Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99: 432-442.