Publication bias in five dental implant journals: An observation from 2005 to 2009

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1024-1032

  Yuan, Judy Chia Chun ^a   Shyamsunder, Nodesh ^a   Barão, Valentim Adelino Ricardo ^b   Lee, Damian J ^a   Sukotjo, Cortino ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Funding; Industry; Publication bias

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIBLIOMETRICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DENTAL RESEARCH; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INDUSTRY; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; BIBLIOMETRICS; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INDUSTRY; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLICATION BIAS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875881448     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Larsen PO, von Ins M. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 2010; 84: 575-603.
2. Crawford JM, Briggs CL, Engeland CG. Publication bias and its implications for evidence-based clinical decision making. J Dent Educ 2010; 74: 593-600.
3. Craig JC, Irwig LM, Stockler MR. Evidence-based medicine: Useful tools for decision making. Med J Aust 2001; 174: 248-253.
4. Dickersin K, Chan S, Chalmers TC, Sacks HS, Smith H Jr. Publication bias and clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1987; 8: 343-353.
5. Easterbrook PJ, Berlin JA, Gopalan R, Matthews DR. Publication bias in clinical research. Lancet 1991; 337: 867-872.
6. Sterling TD. Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance-or vice versa. Am Stat Assoc J 1959; 54: 30-34.
7. Dickersin K. The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. JAMA 1990; 263: 1385-1389.
8. Harris IA, Mourad M, Kadir A, Solomon MJ, Young JM. Publication bias in abstracts presented to the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2007; 15: 62-66.
9. Hasenboehler EA, Choudhrhy IK, Newman JT, Smith WR, Ziran BH, Stahel PF. Bias towards publishing positive results in orthopedic and general surgery: A patient safety issue? Patient Saf Surg 2007; 1: 4.
10. Crawford JM, Briggs CL, Engeland CG. Publication bias and its implications for evidence-based clinical decision making. J Dent Educ 2010; 74: 593-600.
11. Moradi DR, Moy PK, Chiappelli F. Evidence-based research in alternative protocols to dental implantology: A closer look at publication bias. J Calif Dent Assoc 2006; 34: 877-886.
12. Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R. Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 252-260.
13. Johnson RT, Dickersin K. Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: Three of the seven deadly sins. Nat Clin Pract Neurol 2007: 3: 590-591.
14. Dwan K, Altman DG, Arnaiz JA, et al. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One 2008; 3:e3081.
15. Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K. Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009(1):MR000006.
16. Dickersin K, Min YI. Publication bias: The problem that won’t go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 703: 135-146.
17. Dickersin K. How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Educ Prev 1997; 9(1, suppl): 15-21.
18. Dickersin K, Min YI. NIH clinical trials and publication bias. Online J Curr Clin Trials 1993 Apr 28;Doc No 50.
19. Pitak-Arnnop P, Sader R, Rapidis AD, et al. Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: An observation on published controlled trials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38: 4-10.
20. Song F, Parekh-Bhurke S, Hooper L, et al. Extent of publication bias in different categories of research cohorts: A meta-analysis of empirical studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009; 9: 79.
21. Stern JM, Simes RJ. Publication bias: Evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects. Br Med J 1997; 315: 640-645.
22. Chan AW, Altman DG. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: Review of publications and survey of authors. Br Med J 2005; 330: 753.
23. Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: Comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 2004; 291: 2457-2465.
24. Chan AW, Krleza-Jeric K, Schmid I, Altman DG. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Can Med Assoc J 2004; 171: 735-740.
25. Callaham ML, Wears RL, Weber EJ, Barton C, Young G. Positiveoutcome bias and other limitations in the outcome of research abstracts submitted to a scientific meeting. JAMA 1998; 280: 254-257.
26. Horton R. North and south: Bridging the information gap. Lancet 2000; 355: 2231-2236.
27. Alasbali T, Smith M, Geffen N, et al. Discrepancy between results and abstract conclusions in industry-vs nonindustry-funded studies comparing topical prostaglandins. Am J Ophthalmol 2009; 147: 33-38e2.
28. Angell M. Industry-sponsored clinical research: A broken system. JAMA 2008; 300: 1069-1071.
29. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP. Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289: 454-465.
30. Bero L, Oostvogel F, Bacchetti P, Lee K. Factors associated with findings of published trials of drug-drug comparisons: Why some statins appear more efficacious than others. PLoS Med 2007; 4:e184.
31. Bhandari M, Busse JW, Jackowski D, et al. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials. Can Med Assoc J 2004; 170: 477-480.
32. Golder S, Loke YK. Is there evidence for biased reporting of published adverse effects data in pharmaceutical industry-funded studies? 2008; 66: 767-773.
33. Kjaergard LL, Als-Nielsen B. Association between competing interests and authors’ conclusions: Epidemiological study of randomised clinical trials published in the BMJ. Br Med J 2002; 325: 249.
34. Leopold SS, Warme WJ, Fritz Braunlich E, Shott S. Association between funding source and study outcome in orthopaedic research. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003;(415): 293-301.
35. Lesser LI, Ebbeling CB, Goozner M, Wypij D, Ludwig DS. Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLoS Med 2007; 4:e5.
36. Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: Systematic review. Br Med J 2003; 326: 1167-1170.
37. Lexchin JR. Implications of pharmaceutical industry funding on clinical research. Ann Pharmacother 2005; 39: 194-197.
38. Peppercorn J, Blood E, Winer E, Partridge A. Association between pharmaceutical involvement and outcomes in breast cancer clinical trials. Cancer 2007; 109: 1239-1246.
39. Shah RV, Albert TJ, Bruegel-Sanchez V, Vaccaro AR, Hilibrand AS, Grauer JN. Industry support and correlation to study outcome for papers published in Spine. Spine 2005; 30: 1099-1104.
40. Sismondo S. Pharmaceutical company funding and its consequences:A qualitative systematic review. Contemp Clin Trials 2008; 29: 109-113.
41. Yaphe J, Edman R, Knishkowy B, Herman J. The association between funding by commercial interests and study outcome in randomized controlled drug trials. Fam Pract 2001; 18: 565-568.
42. Vickers A, Goyal N, Harland R, Rees R. Do certain countries produce only positive results? A systematic review of controlled trials. Control Clin Trials 1998; 19: 159-166.
43. Fanelli D. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US States Data. PLoS One 2010; 5:e10271.
44. Buchkowsky SS, Jewesson PJ. Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trials over 20 years. Ann Pharmacother 2004; 38: 579-585.
45. Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C. Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. Br Med J 1994; 309: 1286-1291.
46. Lee KP, Boyd EA, Holroyd-Leduc JM, Bacchetti P, Bero LA. Predictors of publication: Characteristics of submitted manuscripts associated with acceptance at major biomedical journals. Med J Aust 2006; 184: 621-626.
47. Yousefi-Nooraie R, Shakiba B, Mortaz-Hejri S. Country development and manuscript selection bias: A review of published studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2006; 6: 37.
48. Scholey JM, Harrison JE. Publication bias: Raising awareness of a potential problem in dental research. Br Dent J 2003; 194: 235-237.
49. Koletsi D, Karagianni A, Pandis N, Makou M, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T. Are studies reporting significant results more likely to be published? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 136: 632e1-5.
50. Polychronopoulou A, Pandis N, Eliades T. Assessment of publication bias in dental specialty journals. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2010; 10: 207-211.
51. Zarb GA. The edentulous milieu. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 825-831.
52. Zarb GA. Introduction to osseointegration in clinical dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 49: 824.
53. Popelut A, Valet F, Fromentin O, Thomas A, Bouchard P. Relationship between sponsorship and failure rate of dental implants: A systematic approach. PLoS One 2010; 5:e10274.
54. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006; 295: 90-93.
55. Rahman M, Fukui T. Biomedical publication-Global profile and trend. Public Health 2003; 117: 274-280.
56. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, von Elm E. Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):MR000005.
57. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implantsupported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 119-130.
58. Slot W, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of implant-supported maxillary overdentures after a mean observation period of at least 1 year. J Clin Periodontol 2010; 37: 98-110.
59. Gualini F, Gualini G, Cominelli R, Lekholm U. Outcome of Brånemark Novum implant treatment in edentulous mandibles: A retrospective 5-year follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 330-337.
60. den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: A systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 1073-1086.
61. Dickersin K, Min YI, Meinert CL. Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. JAMA 1992; 267: 374-378.
62. Olson CM, Rennie D, Cook D, et al. Publication bias in editorial decision making. JAMA 2002; 287: 2825-2828.
63. Davidoff F, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, et al. Sponsorship, authorship and accountability. Can Med Assoc J 2001; 165: 786-788.
64. Shea BJ, Grimshaw JM, Wells GA, et al. Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 10.
65. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000; 283: 2008-2012.
66. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1006-1012.
67. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J 1997; 315: 629-634.
68. Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Turner EH, et al. Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications. Br Med J 2009; 339:b2981.
69. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295: 676-680.
70. Thornton A, Lee P. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Its causes and consequences. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 207-216.
71. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M. Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(2):MR000010.
72. DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB. Impugning the integrity of medical science: The adverse effects of industry influence. JAMA 2008; 299: 1833-185.
73. DeAngelis CD. Conflict of interest and the public trust. JAMA 2000; 284: 2237-2238.
74. Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A, DeAngelis CD. Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research, and role of sponsors in funded studies. JAMA 2005; 294: 110-111.
75. Watters MP, Goodman NW. Comparison of basic methods in clinical studies and in vitro tissue and cell culture studies reported in three anaesthesia journals. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82: 295-298.