The European Association of Urology Robotic Urology Section (ERUS) survey of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)

BJU International

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 596-603

  Ficarra, Vincenzo ^a   Wiklund, Peter N ^b   Rochat, Charles Henry ^c   Dasgupta, Prokar ^d   Challacombe, Benjamin J ^d   Sooriakumaran, Prasanna ^e   Siemer, Stefan ^f   Suardi, Nazareno ^g   Novara, Giacomo ^a   Mottrie, Alexandre ^h,i  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^c Multidisciplinary Centre of Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery   (Switzerland)

^d GUY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^e ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^g VITA SALUTE SAN RAFFAELE UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

^h OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

ⁱ EAU Robotic Urologic Section (ERUS) Scientific Working Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

prostate cancer; radical prostatectomy; robotic; surgeon; survey

Indexed keywords

ANTEGRADE TECHNIQUE; ARTICLE; ATHERMAL DISSECTION OF THE NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE; BLADDER SURGERY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATECTOMY; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS; SEMINAL VESICLE; SURGEON; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSPERITONEAL TECHNIQUE; UROLOGY;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONSENSUS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EUROPE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; UROLOGY;

EID: 84875819648     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12100     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 368-381
2. Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 382-404
3. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 431-452
4. Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 405-417
5. Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 418-430
6. Beck S, Skarecky D, Osann K, Juarez R, Ahlering TE,. Transverse versus vertical camera port incision in robotic radical prostatectomy: effect on incisional hernias and cosmesis. Urology 2011; 78: 586-590
7. Secin FP, Bianco FJ, Cronin A, et al. Is it necessary to remove the seminal vesicles completely at radical prostatectomy? Decision curve analysis of European Society of Urologic Oncology criteria. J Urol 2009; 181: 609-613
8. Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 179-192
9. Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ,. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int 2004; 94: 1071-1076
10. Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E, et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int 2006; 98: 314-323
11. Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, et al. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 629-639
12. Tewari AK, Yadav R, Takenaka A, et al. Anatomic foundations for nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy. Correlations between anatomic surgical and, 'real time tissue recognition' with multiphoton microscopy. J Urol 2008; 179: 462-467
13. Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL,. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 2009; 74: 619-623
14. Novara G, Ficarra V, D'Elia C, Secco S, Cavalleri S, Artibani W., Trifecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2011; 107: 100-104
15. Patel VR, Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, et al. Periurethral suspension stitch during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: description of the technique and continence outcomes. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 472-478
16. Tewari A., Jhaveri J., Rao S., et al. Total reconstruction of the vesicourethral junction. BJU Int 2008; 101: 871-877
17. Krane LS, Bhandari M, Peabody JO, Menon M,. Impact of percutaneous suprapubic tube drainage on patient discomfort after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 325-330