Interactions between overstorey and understorey vegetation along an overstorey compositional gradient

Journal of Vegetation Science

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 543-552

  Bartels, Samuel F ^a   Chen, Han Y H ^a  

^a LAKEHEAD UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Competition; Facilitation; Path analysis; Resource availability; Vegetation layers

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; BOREAL FOREST; BRYOPHYTE; COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; FACILITATION; FOREST CANOPY; FOREST FLOOR; HERB; ION EXCHANGE; LICHEN; OVERSTORY; PATH ANALYSIS; PH; PHOSPHORUS; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY; SHRUB; SOIL NITROGEN; SOIL NUTRIENT; SPECIES RICHNESS; UNDERSTORY; VEGETATION COVER;

CANADA; ONTARIO [CANADA]; QUEBEC [CANADA];

BRYOPHYTA; BRYOPHYTES; CONIFEROPHYTA;

EID: 84875806462     PISSN: 11009233     EISSN: 16541103     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2012.01479.x     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Augusto, L., Dupouey, J.L. & Ranger, J. 2003. Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. Annals of Forest Science 60: 823-831.
2. Bartemucci, P., Messier, C. & Canham, C.D. 2006. Overstory influences on light attenuation patterns and understory plant community diversity and composition in southern boreal forests of Quebec. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36: 2065-2079.
3. Bergeron, Y., Gauthier, S., Flannigan, M. & Kafka, V. 2004. Fire regimes at the transition between mixedwood and coniferous boreal forest in Northwestern Quebec. Ecology 85: 1916-1932.
4. Botting, R.S. & DeLong, C. 2009. Macrolichen and bryophyte responses to coarse woody debris characteristics in sub-boreal spruce forest. Forest Ecology and Management 258: S85-S94.
5. Bradfield, G.E. & Scagel, A. 1984. Correlations among vegetation strata and environmental variables in subalpine spruce-fir forests, southeastern British-Columbia. Vegetatio 55: 105-114.
6. Brassard, B.W. & Chen, H.Y.H. 2006. Stand structural dynamics of North American boreal forests. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 25: 115-137.
7. Brassard, B.W., Chen, H.Y.H., Bergeron, Y. & Pare, D. 2011. Differences in fine root productivity between mixed- and single-species stands. Functional Ecology 25: 238-246.
8. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range & British Columbia Ministry of Environment. 2010. Field manual for describing terrestrial ecosystems, 2nd ed. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range & British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Victoria, British Columbia, CA.
9. Brown, J.R., Scanlan, J.C. & McIvor, J.G. 1998. Competition by herbs as a limiting factor in shrub invasion in grassland: a test with different growth forms. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 829-836.
10. Carter, M.R. & Greorich, E.G. 2007. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, US.
11. Cavard, X., Bergeron, Y., Chen, H.Y.H. & Pare, D. 2010. Mixed-species effect on tree aboveground carbon pools in the east-central boreal forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 40: 37-47.
12. Cavard, X., Bergeron, Y., Chen, H.Y.H. & Pare, D. 2011. Effect of forest canopy composition on soil nutrients and dynamics of the understorey: mixed canopies serve neither vascular nor bryophyte strata. Journal of Vegetation Science 22: 1105-1119.
13. Cavieres, L.A. & Badano, E.I. 2009. Do facilitative interactions increase species richness at the entire community level? Journal of Ecology 97: 1181-1191.
14. Chavez, V. & Macdonald, S.E. 2010. Understory species interactions in mature boreal mixedwood forests. Botany 88: 912-922.
15. Chen, H.Y.H. & Popadiouk, R.V. 2002. Dynamics of North American boreal mixedwoods. Environmental Reviews 10: 137-166.
16. Chen, H.Y.H., Klinka, K. & Kayahara, G.J. 1996. Effects of light on growth, crown architecture, and specific leaf area for naturally established Pinus contorta var latifolia and Pseudotsuga menziesii var glauca saplings. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1149-1157.
17. Connell, J.H. & Slatyer, R.O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111: 1119-1144.
18. Cuesta, B., Villar-Salvador, P., Puertolas, J., Benayas, J.M.R. & Michalet, R. 2010. Facilitation of Quercus ilex in Mediterranean shrubland is explained by both direct and indirect interactions mediated by herbs. Journal of Ecology 98: 687-696.
19. Dynesius, M. & Zinko, U. 2006. Species richness correlations among primary producers in boreal forests. Diversity and Distributions 12: 703-713.
20. Environment Canada. 2011. Canadian Climate Normals 1981-2010. Available at: http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climate_normals/results_e.html Accessed 25 June 2011.
21. Frego, K.A. & Carleton, T.J. 1995. Microsite conditions and spatial pattern in a boreal bryophyte community. Canadian Journal of Botany 73: 544-551.
22. Gilliam, F.S. & Roberts, M.R. 2003. Interactions between the herbaceous layer and overstory canopy of eastern forests: a mechanism for linkages. In: Gilliam, F.S. & Roberts, M.R. (eds.) The Herbaceous layer in forests of eastern North America, pp. 198-223. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, US.
23. Gilliam, F.S., Turrell, N.L. & Adams, M.B. 1995. Herbaceous layer and overstory species in clear-cut and mature central Appalachian hardwood forests. Ecological Applications 5: 947-955.
24. Grace, J.B. 1999. The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2: 1-28.
25. Grace, J.B., Anderson, T.M., Olff, H. & Scheiner, S.M. 2010. On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. Ecological Monographs 80: 67-87.
26. Grime, J.P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
27. Gutiérrez, J.R., Meserve, P.L., Contreras, L.C., Vásquez, H. & Jaksic, F.M. 1993. Spatial distribution of soil nutrients and ephemeral plants underneath and outside the canopy of Porlieria chilensis shrubs (Zygophyllaceae) in arid coastal Chile. Oecologia 95: 347-352.
28. Hacker, S.D. & Gaines, S.D. 1997. Some implications of direct positive interactions for community species diversity. Ecology 78: 1990-2003.
29. Hart, S.A. & Chen, H.Y.H. 2008. Fire, logging, and overstory affect understory abundance, diversity, and composition in boreal forest. Ecological Monographs 78: 123-140.
30. Hobbie, S.E. 1992. Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7: 336-339.
31. Hylander, K., Dynesius, M., Jonsson, B.G. & Nilsson, C. 2005. Substrate form determines the fate of bryophytes in riparian buffer strips. Ecological Applications 15: 674-688.
32. Ilisson, T. & Chen, H.Y.H. 2009. Response of six boreal tree species to stand replacing fire and clearcutting. Ecosystems 12: 820-829.
33. Ingerpuu, N., Vellak, K., Liira, J. & Partel, M. 2003. Relationships between species richness patterns in deciduous forests at the north Estonian limestone escarpment. Journal of Vegetation Science 14: 773-780.
34. Légaré, S., Bergeron, Y., Leduc, A. & Pare, D. 2001. Comparison of the understory vegetation in boreal forest types of southwest Quebec. Canadian Journal of Botany 79: 1019-1027.
35. Légaré, S., Paré, D. & Bergeron, Y. 2005. Influence of aspen on forest floor properties in black spruce - dominated stands. Plant and Soil 275: 207-220.
36. Löbel, S., Dengler, J. & Hobohm, C. 2006. Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichens in dry grasslands: the effects of environment, landscape structure and competition. Folia Geobotanica 41: 377-393.
37. Maestre, F.T., Callaway, R.M., Valladares, F. & Lortie, C.J. 2009. Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. Journal of Ecology 97: 199-205.
38. Márialigeti, S., Németh, B., Tinya, F. & Ódor, P. 2009. The effects of stand structure on ground-floor bryophyte assemblages in temperate mixed forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 2223-2241.
39. Marie-Victorin, Rouleau, E. & Brouillet, L. 2002. Flore Laurentienne, 3rd ed. Gaëtan Morin, Montreal, QC, CA.
40. McCune, B. & Antos, J.A. 1981. Correlations between forest layers in the Swan Valley, Montana. Ecology 62: 1196-1204.
41. McKenzie, D., Halpern, C.B. & Nelson, C.R. 2000. Overstory influences on herb and shrub communities in mature forests of western Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1655-1666.
42. Messier, C., Parent, S. & Bergeron, Y. 1998. Effects of overstory and understory vegetation on the understory light environment in mixed boreal forests. Journal of Vegetation Science 9: 511-520.
43. Miller, T.E. 1994. Direct and indirect species interactions in an early old-field plant community. American Naturalist 143: 1007-1025.
44. Mueller-Dumbois, D. & Ellenberg, H. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Toronto, ON, CA.
45. Paré, D. & Bergeron, Y. 1996. Effect of colonizing tree species on soil nutrient availability in a clay soil of the boreal mixedwood. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26: 1022-1031.
46. Prescott, C.E., Zabec, L.M., Staley, C.L. & Kabzems, R. 2000. Decomposition of broadleaf and needle litter in forests of British Columbia: influences of litter type, forest type, and litter mixtures. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30: 1742-1750.
47. Pugnaire, F.I. & Luque, M.T. 2001. Changes in plant interactions along a gradient of environmental stress. Oikos 93: 42-49.
48. Pugnaire, F.I., Haase, P. & Puigdefabregas, J. 1996a. Facilitation between higher plant species in a semiarid environment. Ecology 77: 1420-1426.
49. Pugnaire, F.I., Haase, P., Puigdefabregas, J., Cueto, M., Clark, S.C. & Incoll, L.D. 1996b. Facilitation and succession under the canopy of a leguminous shrub, Retama sphaerocarpa, in a semi-arid environment in south-east Spain. Oikos 76: 455-464.
50. Saetre, P., Saetre, L.S., Brandtberg, P.O., Lundkvist, H. & Bengtsson, J. 1997. Ground vegetation composition and heterogeneity in pure Norway spruce and mixed Norway spruce- birch stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27: 2034-2042.
51. Schwinning, S. & Weiner, J. 1998. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants. Oecologia 113: 447-455.
52. Senici, D., Chen, H.Y.H., Bergeron, Y. & Cyr, D. 2010. Spatiotemporal variations of fire frequency in central boreal forest. Ecosystems 13: 1227-1238.
53. Speziale, K.L., Ruggiero, A. & Ezcurra, C. 2010. Plant species richness-environment relationships across the Subantarctic-Patagonian transition zone. Journal of Biogeography 37: 449-464.
54. Spies, T.A., Franklin, J.F. & Thomas, T.B. 1988. Coarse woody debris in Douglas-fir forests of western Oregon and Washington. Ecology 69: 1689-1702.
55. Startsev, N., Lieffers, V.J. & Landhausser, S.M. 2008. Effects of leaf litter on the growth of boreal feather mosses: implication for forest floor development. Journal of Vegetation Science 19: 253-260.
56. Taylor, K.C., Arnup, R.W., Meredith, M.P., Parton, W.J. & Nieppola, J. 2000. A field guide to forest ecosystems of northeastern Ontario. NEST Field Guide FG-01, 2nd ed. Northeast Science and Technology, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Timmins, ON, CA.
57. Thomas, S.C., Halpern, C.B., Falk, D.A., Liguori, D.A. & Austin, K.A. 1999. Plant diversity in managed forests: understory responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecological Applications 9: 864-879.
58. Thompson, D.B., Walker, L.R., Landau, F.H. & Stark, L.R. 2005. The influence of elevation, shrub species, and biological soil crust on fertile islands in the Mojave Desert, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 61: 609-629.
59. Wesser, S.D. & Armbruster, W.S. 1991. Species distribution controls across a forest-steppe transition - a causal model and experimental test. Ecological Monographs 61: 323-342.
60. Wootton, J.T. 1994. Predicting direct and indirect effects - an integrated approach using experiments and path analysis. Ecology 75: 151-165.
61. Wright, S. 1921. Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research 20: 557-585.
62. Yuan, Z.Y. & Chen, H.Y.H. 2010. Fine root biomass, production, turnover rates, and nutrient content in boreal forest ecosystems in relation to species, climate, fertility, and stand age: Literature review and meta-analyses. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 29: 204-221.