Quantitative myocardial contrast supine bicycle stress echocardiography for detection of coronary artery disease

Echocardiography

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 392-400

  Miszalski Jamka, Tomasz ^a   Kuntz Hehner, Stefanie ^b   Tiemann, Klaus ^c   Karwat, Krzysztof ^a   Kostkiewicz, Magdalena ^a  

^a Krakowski Szpital Specjalistyczny Im Jana Pawła II   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

coronary artery disease; myocardial contrast echocardiography; supine bicycle stress; two dimensional echocardiography

Indexed keywords

SONOVUE;

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPH; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL CONTRAST ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUPINE POSITION; TWO DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE;

EID: 84875804049     PISSN: 07422822     EISSN: 15408175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/echo.12064     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Tiemann K, Lohmeier S, Kuntz S, et al. Real-time contrast echo assessment of myocardial perfusion at low emission power: First experimental and clinical results using power pulse inversion imaging. Echocardiography 1999; 6: 799-809.
2. Wei K, Jayaweera AR, Firoozan S, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. Circulation 1998; 97: 473-483.
3. Van Camp G, Ay T, Pasquet A, et al. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and assessment of its transmural distribution with real-time power modulation myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 263-270.
4. Leong-Poi H, Le E, Rim SJ, et al. Quantification of myocardial perfusion and determination of coronary stenosis severity during hyperemia using real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 1173-1182.
5. Masugata H, Peters B, Lafitte S, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary stenosis by real-time myocardial contrast echo refilling curves. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 262-269.
6. Leistad E, Ohmori K, Peterson TA, et al. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion during graded coronary artery stenoses by intravenous myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 624-631.
7. Gudmundsson P, Shahgaldi K, Winter R, et al. Parametric quantification of myocardial ischemia using real-time perfusion adenosine stress echocardiography images, with SPECT as reference method. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2010; 30: 30-42.
8. Malm S, Frigstad S, Torp H, et al. Quantitative adenosine real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2006; 19: 365-372.
9. Korosoglou G, da Silva KG Jr, Labadze N, et al. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for pharmacologic stress testing: Is quantitative estimation of myocardial blood flow reserve necessary? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17: 1-9.
10. Vogel R, Indermühle A, Reinhardt J, et al. The quantification of absolute myocardial perfusion in humans by contrast echocardiography: Algorithm and validation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 45: 754-762.
11. Lafitte S, Matsugata H, Peters B, et al. Comparative Value of Dobutamine and Adenosine Stress in the Detection of Coronary Stenosis With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography. Circulation 2001; 103: 2724-2730.
12. Leong-Poi H, Rim SJ, Le DE, et al. Perfusion versus function: The ischemic cascade in demand ischemia: Implications of single-vessel versus multivessel stenosis. Circulation 2002; 105: 987-992.
13. Kowatsch I, Tsutsui JM, Osõrio AF, et al. Head-to-head comparison of dobutamine and adenosine stress real-time myocardial perfusion echocardiography for the detection of coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2007; 20: 1109-1117.
14. Cwajg J, Xie F, O'Leary E, et al. Detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease with accelerated intermittent imaging after intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast material. Am Heart J 2000; 139: 675-683.
15. Porter TR, Xie F, Silver M, et al. Real-time perfusion imaging with low mechanical index pulse inversion Doppler imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 748-753.
16. Elhendy A, O'Leary EL, Xie F, et al. Comparative accuracy of real-time myocardial contrast perfusion imaging and wall motion analysis during dobutamine stress echocardiography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 2185-2191.
17. Miszalski-Jamka T, Kuntz-Hehner S, Schmidt H, et al. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography during supine bicycle stress and continuous infusion of contrast agent. Cutoff values for myocardial contrast replenishment discriminating abnormal myocardial perfusion. Echocardiography 2007; 24: 638-648.
18. Miszalski-Jamka T, Kuntz-Hehner S, Schmidt H, et al. Impact of previous myocardial infarction on the incremental value of myocardial contrast to two-dimensional supine bicycle stress echocardiography in evaluation of coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol 2009; 136: 47-55.
19. Fletcher GF, Balady GJ, Amsterdam EA, et al. Exercise standards for testing and training: A statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association. Circulation 2001; 104: 1694-1740.
20. Cerquiera MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council of Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002; 105: 539-542.
21. Pereztol-Valdés O, Candell-Riera J, Santana-Boado C, et al. Correspondence between left ventricular 17 myocardial segments and coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2005; 26: 2637-2643.
22. Shimoni S, Zoghbi WA, Xie F, et al. Real-time assessment of myocardial perfusion and wall motion during bicycle and treadmill exercise echocardiography: Comparison with single photon emission computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 741-747.
23. Wei K, Ragosta M, Thorpe J, et al. Noninvasive quantification of coronary blood flow reserve in humans using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circulation 2001; 103: 2560-2565.
24. Lafitte S, Masugata H, Peters B, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of coronary flow rate assessment by real-time contrast echocardiography: In vitro and in vivo studies. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001; 14: 1010-1019.
25. Sun FR, Zhang MQ, Jia XB, et al. Region of interest tracking in real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Med Syst 2011; 35: 163-167.
26. Seiler C, Fleisch M, Meier B,: Direct intracoronary evidence of collateral steal in humans. Circulation 1997; 96: 4261-4267.
27. Di Bello V, Giorgi D, Pedrinelli R, et al. Early impairment of myocardial blood flow reserve in men with essential hypertension: A quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2004; 17: 1037-1043.
28. Sicari R,: Anti-ischemic therapy and stress testing: Pathophysiologic, diagnostic and prognostic implications. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2004; 2: 14.
29. Mor-Avi V, Collins KA, Korcarz CE, et al. Detection of regional temporal abnormalities in left ventricular function during acute myocardial ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2001; 280: H1770-H1781.