Planning, markets, and patterns of residential growth in metropolitan prague

Journal of Architectural and Planning Research

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 278-291

  Stanilov, Kiril ^a,b,c   Sykora, Ludek ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LAND USE CHANGE; MARKET SYSTEM; METROPOLITAN AREA; RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; STATE ROLE; SUBURBANIZATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN PLANNING;

CZECH REPUBLIC;

EID: 84875797993     PISSN: 07380895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Balchin P, Sykora L, Bull G (1999) Regional policy and planning in Europe. London: Routledge.
3. Borufka S (2010) One-third of Praguers considering relocating. The Prague Post 6 October, http:/ /www.praguepost.com/news/5916-one-third-of-praguers- consideringrelocating .html. Site accessed 10 January 2011.
4. Bruegmann R (2006) Sprawl: A compact history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Buff M (2003) Pushing the envelope. The Prague Post 19 February, http://www.praguepost.com/ archivescontent/36770-pushing-the-envelope.html. Site accessed 10 January 2011.
6. City Development Authority Prague (2009) Planning analytical materials of the City of Prague: Transport (Czech). http://www.urm.cz/uploads/assets/ soubory/data/UAP/UAP-book/kapitoly/ 02-kapitola-2-12-uap-2008.pdf. Site accessed 5 January 2011.
7. City of Prague (2000) Strategic plan for Prague. Prague: City Development Authority Prague.
8. Contiguglia C (2010) Prague is best CEE city for business-survey. The Prague Post 13 October, www .praguepost.com/business/6003-prague-is-best-cee- city-for-business-survey.html. Site accessed 10 January 2011.
9. Dyos HJ (1961) Victorian suburb: A study of the growth of Camberwell. Leicester, UK: Leicester University.
10. European Academy of the Urban Environment (EAUE) (2003) Twelve candidate countries overview report on sustainable urban management, sustainable urban transport, sustainable urban design and sustainable construction. Berlin: EAUE.
11. European Commission (2010) EUROPE 2020: A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. Brussels: European Commission.
12. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2006) Urban sprawl in Europe: The ignored challenge. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
13. Fibigerova N (2009) New master plan for Prague takes shape. CIJ Journal September, www.cijjournal .com/Main/Story.aspx?id=3099. Site accessed 11 November 2010.
14. Floor H, van Kempen R (1997) Analysing housing preferences with decision plan nets. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 14(1):27-42.
15. Hirt S (2007) Suburbanizing sofia: Characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. Urban Geography28(8):755-780.
16. Hirt S, Stanilov K (2009) Twenty years of transition: The evolution of urban planning in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, 1989-2009. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
17. Horak M (2007) Governing the post-communist city: Institutions and democratic development in Prague. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
18. Keivani R, Parsa A, McGreal S (2001) Globalisation, institutional structures and real estate markets in Central European cities. Urban Studies 38(13):2457-2416.
19. Kok H, Kovacs Z (1999) The process of suburbanisation in the agglomeration of Budapest. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 14(2): 119-141.
20. Lisowski A (2004) Social aspects of the suburbanisation stage in the agglomeration of Warsaw. In M Pak (Ed.), DELA 21: Proceedings from the IGU Urban Commission meeting "Cities in Transition. " Ljubljana, Slovenia: University of Ljubljana Department of Geography, pp. 531-541.
21. Magistrat Hlavního Mesta Prahy (Prague City Hall) (2011) Uzemni plan (Master plan) (Czech), http:// magistrat.praha-mesto.cz/5952-Uzemni-plan- hl-m-Prahy-Zakladni-informace. Site accessed 8 January 2011.
22. Maier K (1998) Czech planning in transition: Assets and deficiencies. International Planning Studies 3(3)351-365.
23. Maier K (2003) The Prague metropolitan region. In W Salet, A Thornley, and A Kreukels (Eds.), Metropolitan governance and spatial planning: Comparative case studies of European cityregions. London: Taylor & Francis, pp. 205-229.
24. Ministerstvo pro Mistni Rozvoj (MMR) (Ministry of Regional Development) (2009) Politika uzemniho rozvoje Ceske republiky 2008 (Regional development policy of the Czech Republic 2008) (Czech), http://www.mmr.cz/getdoc/873d 1 a09-3b9d-4a 12-9924-e42eb641 a0ad/IIINavrh-PUR-CR-2008. Site accessed 16 October 2010.
25. Nedovic-Budic Z (2001) Adjustment of planning practice to the new Eastern and Central European context. Journal of the American Planning Association 67(1):38-52.
26. Nuissl H, Rink D (2005) The "production" of urban sprawl in eastern Germany as a phenomenon of postsocialist transformation. Cities 22(2): 123-134. (Pubitemid 40518365)
27. Pichler-Milanovic N (2005) The effects of policies and planning regulation on urban sprawl in Slovenia and Ljubljana urban region. Potsdam, Germany: URBS PANDENS.
28. Pichler-Milanovic N, Gutry-Korycka M, Rink D (2008) Sprawl in the post-socialist city: The changing economic and institutional context of Central and Eastern European cities. In C Couch, L Leontidou, and G Petschel-Held (Eds.), Urban sprawl in Europe: Landscapes, landuse change and policy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd., pp. 102-135.
29. Posova D, Sýkora L (2011) Urbanizace a suburbanizace v mestskych regionech Prahy a Vidnen;: Strukturální rozdily v podminkach odlisnych politicko-ekonomickych rezimu (Urbanization and suburbanization in the urban regions of Prague and Vienna: Structural differences in the presence of different political-economic regimes). Geografie (Czech) 116(3):276-299.
30. Razin E, Dijst M, Vazquez C (Eds.) (2007) Employment deconcentration in European metropolitan areas. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
31. Richardson HW, Bae CHC (Eds.) (2004) Urban sprawl in Western Europe and the United States. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
32. Stanilov K (2007a) Housing trends in Central and Eastern European cities during and after the period of transition. In K Stanilov (Ed.), The post-socialist city: Urban form andspacetransformations in Central and Eastern Europe after socialism. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 173-190.
33. Stanilov K (2007b) The restructuring of non-residential uses in the post-socialist metropolis. In K Stanilov (Ed.), The post-socialist city: Urban form and space transformations in Centrai and Eastern Europe after socialism. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 73-99.
34. Stanilov K, Scheer BC (Eds.) (2003) Suburban form: An international perspective. London: Routledge.
35. Stredocesky Kraj (Central Bohemian Region) (2006) Program rozvoje uzemniho obvodu stredoceskeho Kraje (Regional development policy of central Bohemia) (Czech), http://www.krstredocesky.cz/portal/SouborUsneseniRady.ashx?id= 7053&def=UsneseniRady. Site accessed 23 September 2010.
36. Sykora L (1995) Prague. In J Berry and S McGreal (Eds.), European cities, planning systems, and property markets. London: E&FN Spon, pp. 321 -344.
37. Sýkora L (1996) The Czech Republic. In PBalchin(Ed.),Housingpolicy in Europe. London: Routledge, pp. 272-288.
38. Sykora L (1999) Changes in the internal spatial structure of post-communist Prague. GeoJournal 49(1):79-89.
39. Sykora L (2003) Between the state and the market: Local government and housing in the Czech Republic. In M Lux (Ed.), Housing policy: An end or a new beginning? Budapest: Local Government and Public Reform Initiative, Open Society Institute, pp. 47-116.
40. Sýkora L (2006) Urban development, policy and planning in the Czech Republic and Prague. In U Altrock and S Gunter (Eds.), Spatial planning and urban development in the new EU member states. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 113-140.
41. Sykora L (2009) Post-socialist cities. In R Kitchin and N Thrift (Eds.), International encyclopedia of human geography, Vol. 8. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, pp. 387-395.
42. Sýkora L, Mulicek O (2009) The micro-regional nature of functional urban areas (FUAs): Lessons from the analysis of the Czech urban and regional system. Urban Research and Practice 2(3):287-307.
43. Sykora L, Ourednicek M (2007) Sprawling post-communist metropolis: Commercial and residential suburbanization in Prague and Brno, the Czech Republic. In E Razin, M Dijst, and C Vazquez (Eds.), Employment deconcentration in European metropolitan areas: Market forces versus planning regulations. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 209-233.
44. Sykora L, Posova D (2007) Specifika suburbanizace v post-socialistickem kontextu: Nova bytová výstavba v metropolitni oblasti Prahy 1997-2005 (The specifics of suburbanization in the post-socialist context: New housing construction in the metropolitan area of Prague 1997-2005) (Czech). Geografie 112(3):334-356. (Pubitemid 350089241)
45. Tammaru T, Leetmaa K, Silm S, Ahas R (2009) Temporal and spatial dynamics of the new residential areas around Tallinn. European Planning Studies 17(3):423-439.
46. Timar J, Varadi M (2001) The uneven development of suburbanization during transition in Hungary. European Urban and Regional Studies 8(4):349-360. (Pubitemid 32984266)
47. Warner SB (1962) Streetcar suburbs: The process of growth in Boston, 1870-1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48. White R, Engelen G, Uljee I (1997) The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B 24(3):323-343.
49. Centre for Advanced