Analysing housing preferences with decision plan nets

Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 27-42

  Floor, Han ^a   Van Kempen, Ronald ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION PLAN NET; HOUSING PREFERENCE; METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH; PREFERENCE ANALYSIS;

EID: 0030821606     PISSN: 02815737     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02815739708730419     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Adams, J. S. and K. S. Gilder (1976) “Household location and intra-urban migration”, pp. 159-192 in Herbert D. T. and R. J. Johnston (eds), Social Areas in Cities, Volume 1: Spatial Processes and Form. London: Wiley.
2. Bassett, K. and J. Short (1988) “Development and diversity in urban geography”, pp. 175-193 in Gregory, D. and R. Walford (eds), Horizons in Human Geography. London: MacMillan.
3. Bell, W. (1968) “The city, the suburb and a theory of social choice”, pp. 132-168 in Greer, S. (ed.), The New Urbanization. New York: St. Martins.
4. Boelhouwer, P. and H. van der Heijden (1992) Housing Systems in Europe: Part 1; a Comparative Study of Housing Policy. Delft: Delft University Press.
5. Bourne, L. S. (1981) The Geography of Housing. London: E. Arnold.
6. Brown, L. A. and E. G. Moore (1970) “The intra-urban migration process: a perspective”, Geografiska Annaler 52B: 368-381.
7. Camstra, R. (1992) Decision plan nets en het substitutiegedrag in woningkeuzeprocessen (Decision plan nets and substitution behaviour in housing choice processes). Delft: INRO/TNO.
8. Clark, W. A. V. and F. M. Dieleman (1996) Households and Housing; Choices and Outcomes in the Housing Market. New Brunswick: Centre for Urban Policy Research.
9. Clark, W. A. V., M. C. Deurloo and F. M. Dieleman (1986) “Residential mobility in Dutch housing markets”, Environment and Planning A 18: 763-788.
10. Clark, W. A. V. and P. C. J. Everaers (1981) “Public policy and residential mobility in Dutch cities”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 72: 322-333.
11. Clark, W. A. V. and J. L. Onaka (1983) “Life cycle and housing adjustment as explanations of residential mobility”, Urban Studies 20: 47-57.
12. Deurloo, M. C., W. A. V. Clark and F. M. Dieleman (1990) “Choice of residential environment in the Randstad”, Urban Studies 27: 335-351.
13. Deurloo, M. C., W. A. V. Clark and F. M. Dieleman (1994) “The move to housing ownership in temporal and regional contexts”, Environment and Planning A 26: 1659-1670.
14. Dieleman, F. M. (1986) “The future of Dutch housing: a review and interpretation of the recent literature”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 77: 336-344.
15. Doling, J., V. Karn and B. Stafford (1986) “The impact of unemployment on homeownership”, Housing Studies 1: 49-59.
16. Filius, F. C., F. M. Dieleman and P. Hooimeijer (1991) “Departure from the housing market: effects on housing supply in the Netherlands”, Housing Studies 6: 240-250.
17. Filius, F. and L. Lundin (1992) “Aging and housing market dynamics: a case study of local supply and demand”, Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research 9: 79-92.
18. Floor, H. and R. van Kempen (1994) Wonen op maat; een onderzoek naar de voorkeuren en motieven van woonconsumenten en te verwachten ontwikkelingen daarin. Deel 1: theoretische uitgangspunten en probleemstelling (Suitable housing: an investigation into housing consumer’s preferences and motives and expected developments. Part 1: theoretical notions and research questions). Utrecht: Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen (Faculty of Geographical Sciences), Universiteit Utrecht.
19. Floor, H., R. van Kempen and A. de Vocht (1996) “Leaving Randstad Holland: an analysis of housing preferences with decision plan nets”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 11 (forthcoming).
20. Goetgeluk, R. (1992) Zoek-en substitutiegedrag op de woningmarkt (Search and substitution behaviour in the housing market). Utrecht: Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen (Faculty of Geographical Sciences), Universiteit Utrecht.
21. Goetgeluk, R. (1997) Bomen over Wonen. Woningmarktonderzoek met beslissingsbomen Trees and housing. Housing market research with decision trees. Utrecht: Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen Faculty of Geographical Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht.
22. Harts, J. J. and L. Hingstman (1986) “Move histories and socio-economic position”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 1: 343-352.
23. Haurin, D. R. and H. L. Gill (1987) “Effects of income variability on the demand for owner-occupied housing”, Journal of Urban Economics 22: 136-150.
24. Herlyn, U. (1989) “Upgrading and downgrading of urban areas”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 80: 97-105.
25. Loikkanen, H. A. (1992) “Housing demand and tenure choice: evidence from Finland”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 7: 9-30.
26. Marcuse, P. (1993) “What’s so new about divided cities?”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 17: 355-365.
27. Meusen, H. and R. van Kempen (1995) “Towards residual housing? A comparison of Britain and the Netherlands”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 10: 239-258.
28. Ministerie VROM (Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the Environment) (1995) Volkshuisvesting in cijfers (Housing in figures). The Hague: Ministerie VROM.
29. Molin, E., H. Oppewal and H. Timmermans (1996) “Predicting consumer response to new housing: a stated choice experiment”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 11 (forthcoming).
30. Mulder, C. H. (1996) “Housing choice: assumptions and approaches”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 11 (forthcoming).
31. Nakanishi, M. (1974) “Decision-net models and human information processing”, pp. 75-88 in Hughes, G. D. and M. L. Ray (eds), Buyer/Consumer Information Processing. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
32. Nesslein, T. S. (1981) “The Swedish housing model: an assessment”, Urban Studies 19: 235-246.
33. Op’t Veld, D., E. Bijlsma and J. Starmans (1990) Een kennissysteem voor het formuleren en evalueren van woningaanbod (A decision support system for formulating and evaluating housing supply). Delft: INRO/ TNO.
34. Özüekren, A. S. (1992) Turkish Immigrant Housing in Sweden: An Evaluation of Housing Conditions in a Stockholm Suburb. Gävle: The National Swedish Institute for Building Research.
35. Özüekren, A. S. and R. van Kempen (1997) “Explaining housing conditions and housing-market positions”, in Özüekren, A. S. and R. van Kempen (eds), Turks in European Cities: Housing and Urban Segregation. Utrecht: European Centre on Migration and Ethnic relations (forthcoming).
36. Park, C. W. (1978) “A conflict resolution choice model”, Journal of Consumer Research 5: 124-137.
37. Park, C. W., R. W. Hughes, V. Thukral and R. Friedmann (1981) “Consumers’ decision plans and subsequent choice behavior”, Journal of Marketing, Spring 1981, pp. 33-47.
38. Popp, H. (1976) “The residential location process; some theoretical and empirical considerations”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 67: 300-305.
39. Rex, J. A. (1968) “The sociology of a zone of transition”, pp. 211-231 in Pahl, R. E. (ed.), Readings in Urban Sociology. London: Pergamom.
40. Rex, J. and S. Tomlinson (1979) Colonial Immigrants in a British City; a Class Analysis. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
41. Rossi, P. H. (1955) Why Families Move; a Study in the Social Psychology of Urban Residential Mobility. Glencoe: Free Press.
42. Saunders, P. (1986) “The sociology of consumption: a new research agenda” Paper for the Scottish British Sociological Seminar on the State, Edinburgh, February 1, 1986.
43. Short, J. R. (1978) “Residential mobility”, Progress in Human Geography 2: 419-477.
44. Siksiö, O. and L.-E. Borgegard (1990) “Markets in distress; on access to housing in local housing markets”, in Housing Sociology in Times of Change; proceedings from the 7th Meeting of the CIB Working Commission W69 Housing Sociology. Gävle: The National Swedish Institute for Building Research
45. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962) “The costs and returns of human migration”, Journal of Political Economy 70: 80-93.
46. Speare, A. (1974) “Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility”, Demography 11: 173-188.
47. Speare, A., S. Goldstein and W. H. Frey (1975) Residential Mobility, Migration and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge (Mass.): Ballinger.
48. Stapleton, C. M. (1980) “Reformulation of the family life-cycle concept; implications for residential mobility”, Environment and Planning A 12: 1103-1118.
49. Timmermans, H. J. P. and R. van der Heijden (1987) “Uncovering spatial decision-making processes: a decision net approach applied to recreational choice behaviour”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 78: 297-304.
50. Van Hoorn, F. J. J. H. and J. A. van Ginkel (1986) “Racial leapfrogging in a controlled housing market; the case of the Mediterranean minority in Utrecht, the Netherlands”, Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 77: 187-196.
51. Van Kémpen, R. (1997) “Turks in the Netherlands: housing conditions and segregation in a developed welfare state”, in Özüekren, A. S. and R. van Kempen (eds), Turks in European Cities: Housing and Urban Segregation. Utrecht: European Centre on Migration and Ethnic relations (forthcoming).
52. Van Kempen, R., F. Dekker and J. Floor (1990) “The desire to move and residential mobility”, pp. 84-94 in van Weesep, J. and P. Korcelli (eds), Residential Mobility and Social Change: Studies from Poland and the Netherlands. Utrecht: Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap (Royal Dutch Geographical Society).
53. Van Kempen, R., H. Floor and F. M. Dieleman (1994) Wonen op maat; een onderzoek naar de voorkeuren en motieven van woonconsumenten en te verwachten ontwikkelingen daarin. Deel 3: woonsituatie en woonwensen (Suitable housing: an investigation into housing consumer’s preferences and motives and expected developments. Part 3: Housing situation and housing preferences). Utrecht: Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen (Faculty of Geographical Sciences), Universiteit Utrecht.
54. Van Kempen, R., R. B. J. Teule and J. van Weesep (1989) “Low-income households and their housing situations in large Dutch cities”, The Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research 4: 321-335.
55. Van Weesep, J. (1984) “Condominium conversion in Amsterdam: boon or burden?”, Urban Geography 5: 165-177.
56. Van Weesep, J. and R. van Kempen (1992) “Dual incomes and residential preferences; the changing population profile of large Dutch cities”, pp. 35-47 in Korcelli, P. and J. van Weesep (eds), Housing and Urban Policy in Transition. Warsaw: Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Polish Academy of Sciences.
57. Van Zwetselaar, M. and R. Goetgeluk (1994) “Decision plan nets of housing choice: a critical evaluation of the reliability and validity of this technique”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 9: 247-264.
58. Van Zwetselaar, M., R. W. Goetgeluk and H. Floor (1995) Analysing Potential Housing Consumption by Means of Decision Plan Nets. Utrecht: Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen (Faculty of Geographical Sciences), Universiteit Utrecht.
59. White, H. C. (1971) “Multipliers, vacancy chains and filtering in housing”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners 37: 88-94.
60. Witlox, F. (1995) “Qualitative housing choice modelling: decision plan nets versus decision tables”, Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment 10: 209-237.
61. Wolpert, J. (1965) “Behavioral aspects of the decision to migrate”, Papers and proceedings of the Regional Science Association 15: 159-169.