The "hazards" of extrapolating survival curves

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 369-380

  Davies, Charlotte ^a   Briggs, Andrew ^b   Lorgelly, Paula ^c   Garellick, Göran ^d,f   Malchau, Henrik ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register   (Sweden)

Author keywords

economic evaluation; hip prostheses; prediction; survival analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; SURVIVAL; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MARKOV CHAINS; MIDDLE AGED; PROBABILITY; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84875747923     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X12475091     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Briggs A, Claxton K, Sculpher M Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press ; 2006 :
2. London, UK: NICE ; 2008 :
3. Cleves M, Gould W, Gutierrez R, Marchenko Y 2 nd ed.College Station, TX: STATA Press; 2008. College Station, TX: STATA Press ; 2008 :
4. Latimer N. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 14: Survival Analysis for Economic Evaluations alongside Clinical Trials - Extrapolations alongside Clinical Trials - Extrapolations with Patient-Level Data. Sheffield: Report by the Decision Support Unit. 2011 ;:
5. Jackson CH, Sharples LD, Thompson SG. Survival models in health economic evaluations: balancing fit and parsimony to improve prediction. Int J Biostat. 2010 ; 6 (1). 34
6. Hardoon SL, Lewsey JD, van der Meulen JHP. Continuous monitoring of long-term outcomes with application to hip prostheses. Stat Med. 2007 ; 26 (28). 5081-99
7. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Malchau H. The use of probabilistic decision models in technology assessment: the case of total hip replacement. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2004 ; 3 (2). 79-89
8. Briggs A, Sculpher M, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Malchau H CHE Technical Paper 28.. York, UK: University of York; ; 2003 :
9. London, UK: NICE ; 2000 :
10. Carr AJ, Morris RW, Murray DW, Pysent PB. Survival analysis in joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 ; 75 (2). 178-82
11. Garellick G, Kärrholm J, Rogmark C, Herberts P Annual report 2010. Göteborg, Sweden: Swedish Hip Arthoplasty Register ; 2010 :
12. London, UK: National Joint Registry ; 2010 :
13. Issack PS, Botero HG, Hiebert RN, et al. Sixteen-year follow-up of the cemented Spectron femoral stem for hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2003 ; 18 (7). 925-30
14. Davies C, Lorgelly P, Shemilt I, Mugford M, Tucker K, Macgregor A. Can choices between alternative hip prostheses be evidence based? A review of the economic evaluation literature. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2010 ; 8: 20
15. Gerdtham U-G, Zethraeus N. Predicting survival in cost-effectiveness analyses based on clinical trials. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2003 ; 19 (3). 507-12
16. Royston P. Flexible parametric alternatives to the Cox model: update. Stata J. 2004 ; 4 (1). 98-101
17. Royston P. Flexible parametric alternatives to the Cox model, and more. Stata J. 2001 ; 1 (1). 1-28