Development and pilot test of a process to identify research needs from a systematic review

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 66, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 538-545

  Saldanha, Ian J ^a   Wilson, Lisa M ^b   Bennett, Wendy L ^b,c   Nicholson, Wanda K ^d   Robinson, Karen A ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness research; Evidence based practice; Gestational diabetes; Pilot study; Research priorities; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS; DELPHI STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESEARCH PRIORITY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

EID: 84875741420     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.07.009     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Glossary of terms - comparative effectiveness [Web Page]. Available at http://www. effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/glossary-of-terms/?pageaction= showterm&termid=118. Accessed March 20, 2012.
2. 111th Congress. American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, P.L. 111-115. P.L. 111-5: 2009.
3. K. Chalkidou, D. Whicher, W. Kary, and S. Tunis Comparative effectiveness research priorities: identifying critical gaps in evidence for clinical and health policy decision making Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25 2009 241 248
4. K.A. Robinson, I.J. Saldanha, and N.A. Mckoy Identification of research gaps from evidence-based guidelines: a pilot study in cystic fibrosis Int J Technol Assess Health Care 27 2011 247 252
5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Glossary of Terms - systematic review [Web Page]. Available at http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq. gov/index.cfm/glossary-of-terms/?pageaction=showterm&termid=70. Accessed March 20, 2012.
6. K.A. Robinson, I.J. Saldanha, and N.A. McKoy Development of a framework to identify research gaps from systematic reviews J Clin Epidemiol 64 2011 1325 1330
7. W.K. Nicholson, L.M. Wilson, C.T. Witkop, K. Baptiste-Roberts, W.L. Bennett, and S. Bolen Therapeutic management, delivery, and postpartum risk assessment and screening in gestational diabetes Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 162 2008 1 96
8. W.L. Bennett, S. Bolen, L.M. Wilson, E.B. Bass, and W.K. Nicholson Performance characteristics of postpartum screening tests for type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review J Womens Health (Larchmt) 18 2009 979 987
9. S.H. Golden, W.L. Bennett, K. Baptist-Roberts, L.M. Wilson, B. Barone, and T.L. Gary Antepartum glucose tolerance test results as predictors of type 2 diabetes mellitus in women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review Gend Med 6 suppl 1 2009 109 122
10. K. Baptiste-Roberts, B.B. Barone, T.L. Gary, S.H. Golden, L.M. Wilson, and E.B. Bass Risk factors for type 2 diabetes among women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review Am J Med 122 2009 207 214.e4
11. C.T. Witkop, D. Neale, L.M. Wilson, E.B. Bass, and W.K. Nicholson Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review Obstet Gynecol 113 2009 206 217
12. W. Nicholson, S. Bolen, C.T. Witkop, D. Neale, L. Wilson, and E. Bass Benefits and risks of oral diabetes agents compared with insulin in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review Obstet Gynecol 113 2009 193 205
13. Institute of Medicine (IOM) Initial national priorities for comparative effectiveness research 2009 The National Academies Press Washington DC
14. V. Entwistle, M. Calnan, and P. Dieppe Consumer involvement in setting the health services research agenda: persistent questions of value J Health Serv Res Policy 13 suppl 3 2008 76 81
15. S.L. Sibbald, P.A. Singer, R. Upshur, and D.K. Martin Priority setting: what constitutes success? A conceptual framework for successful priority setting BMC Health Serv Res 9 2009 43
16. A. Hoffman, R. Montgomery, W. Aubry, and S.R. Tunis How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies Health Aff (Millwood) 29 2010 1834 1841
17. M. O'Donnell, and V. Entwistle Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded Health Policy 70 2004 281 290 (Pubitemid 39361099)
18. J. Jones, and D. Hunter Consensus methods for medical and health services research BMJ 311 1995 376 380
19. W.L. Bennett, W.K. Nicholson, I.J. Saldanha, L.M. Wilson, N.A. Mckoy, and K.A. Robinson Future research needs for the management of gestational diabetes. Future Research Needs Paper No. 7. (Prepared by Johns Hopkins University under Contract No. 290-2007-10061-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC005-EF November 2010 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD Available at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm Accessed August 21, 2012