Lives in the balance: Women with cancer and the right to fertility care

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 668-669

  Gracia, Clarisa R ^a   Jeruss, Jacqueline S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SURVIVOR; CANCER THERAPY; CONTRACEPTION; CRYOPRESERVATION; DECISION MAKING; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FEMALE FERTILITY; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GAMETE; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MEDICAL ETHICS; NEOPLASM; NOTE; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PATIENT COUNSELING; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCTION; RISK FACTOR;

CRYOPRESERVATION; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HUMANS; MALE; NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED;

EID: 84875707833     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.5798     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. Loscalzo MJ, Clark KL: The psychosocial context of cancer-related infertility. Cancer Treat Res 138:180-190, 2007
2. Fertile Hope. http://www.fertilehope.org
3. Lee SJ, Schover LR, Partridge AH, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 24:2917-2931, 2006 (Pubitemid 46655598)
4. Rodriguez S, Campo-Engelstein L, Emanuel L: Fertile futurePotential social implications of oncofertility. J Clin Oncol 31:665-667, 2013
5. Patrizio P, Caplan AL: Ethical issues surrounding fertility preservation in cancer patients. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:717-726
6. Cobo A, Meseguer M, Remohí J, et al: Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: A prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Hum Reprod 25:2239-2246, 2010
7. Rienzi L, Cobo A, Paffoni A, et al: Consistent and predictable delivery rates after oocyte vitrification: An observational longitudinal cohort multicentric study. Hum Reprod 27:1606-1612, 2012
8. Mature oocyte cryopreservation: A guideline. Fertil Steril [epub ahead of print on October 12, 2012]
9. Noyes N, Porcu E, Borini A: Over 900 oocyte cryopreservation babies born with no apparent increase in congenital anomalies. Reprod Biomed Online 18:769-776, 2009
10. Donnez J, Jadoul P, Pirard C, et al: Live birth after transplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue after bilateral oophorectomy for benign disease. Fertil Steril 98:720-725, 2012
11. Letourneau JM, Ebbel EE, Katz PP, et al: Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer. Cancer 118:1710-1717, 2012
12. Benagiano G: The ethical dimension of assisted reproduction technology. Reprod Biomed Online 22:655-657, 2011
13. Smitz J, Dolmans MM, Donnez J, et al: Current achievements and future research directions in ovarian tissue culture, in vitro follicle development and transplantation: Implications for fertility preservation. Hum Reprod Update 16: 395-414, 2010
14. Santos RR, Amorim C, Cecconi S, et al: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue: An emerging technology for female germline preservation of endangered species and breeds. Anim Reprod Sci 122:151-163, 2010
15. Robertson JA: Procreative liberty and harm to offspring in assisted reproduction. Am J Law Med 30:7-40, 2004 (Pubitemid 39066256)
16. US Department of Health and Human Services: Child welfare information gateway. www.childwelfare.gov
17. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. www.sart.org
18. Gardino SL, Russell AE, Woodruff TK: Adoption after cancer: Adoption agency attitudes and perspectives on the potential to parent post-cancer. Cancer Treat Res 156:153-170, 2010
19. Petersen TS: A woman's choiceOn women, assisted reproduction and social coercion. Ethical Theory Moral Pract 7:81-90, 2004