Single-versus multilevel fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and multilevel lumbar stenosis: Four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 797-805

  Smorgick, Yossi ^a   Park, Daniel K ^a   Baker, Kevin C ^a   Lurie, Jon D ^b,c   Tosteson, Tor D ^c,d   Zhao, Wenyan ^c   Herkowitz, Harry N ^a   Fischgrund, Jeffrey S ^a   Weinstein, James N ^b,c  

^a WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b William Beaumont Hospital ^*  (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH POLICY AND CLINICAL PRACTICE   (United States)

^d DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

degenerative spondylolisthesis; fusion; lumbar decompression; multilevel spinal stenosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; DEGENERATIVE SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MULTILEVEL DECOMPRESSION AND MULTILEVEL FUSION; MULTILEVEL DECOMPRESSION AND SINGLE LEVEL FUSION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPINAL FUSION; SPINAL STENOSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS;

EID: 84875700165     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827db30f     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cauchoix J, Benoist M, Chassaing V. Degenerative spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976; 115cny KOR 112-29.
2. Jacobsen S, Sonne-Holm S, Rovsing H, et al. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: an epidemiological perspective: the Copenhagen Osteoarthritis Study. Spine 2007; 32cny KOR 120-25.
3. Rosenberg N. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: predisposing factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1975; 57cny KOR 467-74.
4. Weinstein J, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. N Engl J Med 2007; 356cny KOR 2257-70.
5. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Tosteson TD, et al. Surgical compared with nonoperative treatment for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis. Four-year results in the spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) randomized and observational cohorts. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91cny KOR 1295-304.
6. Herkowitz HN, Kurz LT. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective study comparing decompression with decompression and intertransverse process arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73cny KOR 802-8.
7. Hopp E, Tsou PM. Postdecompression lumbar instability. Clin Orthop 1988; 227cny KOR 43-151.
8. Johnsson KE, Willner S, Johnsson K. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 1986; 11cny KOR 107-10.
9. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Larson MG. The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991; 73cny KOR 809-16.
10. Lu WW, Luk KD, Ruan DK, et al. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy. Spine 1999; 24cny KOR 1277-82.
11. Subramaniam V, Chamberlain RH, Theodore N, et al. Biomechanical effects of laminoplasty versus laminectomy: stenosis and stability. Spine 2009; 34cny KOR E573-8.
12. Hsu K, Zucherman J, White A. The long-term effect of lumbar spine fusion: deterioration of adjacent motion segments. In: Yonenobu K, Ono K, Takemitsu Y, eds. Lumbar Fusion and Stabilization. Tokyocny KOR Springer 1993cny KOR 54-64
13. Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, et al. Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine 1996; 21: 549-55.
14. Nagata H, Schendel MJ, Transfeldt EE, et al. The effects of immobilization of long segments of the spine on the adjacent and distal facet force and lumbosacral motion. Spine 1993; 18cny KOR 2471-9.
15. Chen CS, Cheng CK, Liu CL, et al. Stress analysis of the disc adjacent to interbody fusion in lumbar spine. Med Eng Phys 2001; 23cny KOR 483-91.
16. Abdu WA, Lurie JD, Spratt KF, et al. Degenerative spondylolisthesis: does fusion method infl uence outcome? Four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine 2009; 34cny KOR 2351-60.
17. Tai CL, Hsieh PH, Chen WP, et al. Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome-an experimental study in porcine model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9cny KOR 84
18. Postacchini F, Cinotti G. Bone regrowth after surgical decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992; 74cny KOR 862-9.
19. Fischgrund JS, Mackay M, Herkowitz HN, et al. Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation. Spine 1997; 22cny KOR 2807-12.
20. Park DK, An HS, Lurie JD, et al. Does multilevel lumbar stenosis lead to poorer outcomes?: a subanalysis of the spine patient outcomes research trial (SPORT) lumbar stenosis study. Spine 2010; 35cny KOR 439-46.
21. Herkowitz HN, Abraham DJ, Albert TJ. Management of degenerative disc disease above an L5-S1 segment requiring arthrodesis. Spine 1999; 24cny KOR 1268-70.