Biomechanical comparison of lumbar spine instability between laminectomy and bilateral laminotomy for spinal stenosis syndrome - An experimental study in porcine model

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 9, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Tai, Ching Lung ^a,b   Hsieh, Pang Hsing ^b   Chen, Weng Pin ^c   Chen, Lih Huei ^b   Chen, Wen Jer ^b   Lai, Po Liang ^b  

^a CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHANG GUNG UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (Taiwan)

^c CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECOMPRESSION SURGERY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FENESTRATION; HUMAN; LAMINECTOMY; LIGAMENTUM FLAVUM; LUMBAR SPINE; SPINE INSTABILITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LIGAMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SWINE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LAMINECTOMY; LIGAMENTS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SPINAL STENOSIS; SWINE; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 47349087555     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-84     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Postdecompression lumbar instability. E Hopp PM Tsou, Clin Orthop 1988 227 143 151 2962798
2. Postoperative instability after decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis. KE Johnsson S Willner K Johnsson, Spine 1986 11 2 107 110 10.1097/00007632- 198603000-00001 3704799
3. The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis. JN Katz SJ Lipson MG Larson, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1991 73 6 809 816 2071616
4. Stability of the whole lumbar spine after multilevel fenestration and discectomy. WW Lu KD Luk DK Ruan ZQ Fei JC Leong, Spine 1999 24 13 1277 1282 10.1097/00007632-199907010-00002 10404567
5. Bilateral laminotomy and discectomy for segmental lumbar disk disease. Decompression with stability. LD Herron HC Pheasant, Spine 1983 8 1 86 97 10.1097/00007632-198301000-00015 6867860
6. Modified open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy: Operative technique, outcome, and predictors for gait improvement. TT Lee GR Manzano BA Green, J Neurosurg 1997 86 1 64 68 8988083
7. Microdecompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. BK Weiner M Walker RS Brower JA McCulloch, Spine 1999 24 21 2268 2281 10.1097/00007632-199911010- 00016 10562995
8. Role of ligaments and facets in lumbar spinal stability. M Sharma NA Langrana J Rodriguez, Spine 1995 20 8 887 900 10.1097/00007632-199504150-00003 7644953
9. Clinical outcomes and radiological instability following decompressive lumbar laminectomy for degenerative spinal stenosis: A comparison of patients undergoing concomitant arthrodesis versus decompression alone. MW Fox BM Onofrio AD Hanssen, J Neurosurg 1996 85 5 793 802 8893716
10. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: Decompression with and without arthrodesis. D Grob T Humke J Dvorak, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995 77 7 1036 1041 7608225
11. Variance in the measurement of sagittal lumbar spine range of motion among examiners, subjects, and instruments. RS Mayer IH Chen SA Lavender JH Trafimow GB Andersson, Spine 1995 20 13 1489 1493 10.1097/00007632-199507000- 00008 8623068
12. The surgical treatment of central lumber stenosis. Multiple laminotomy compared with total laminectomy. F Postacchini G Cinotti D Perugia S Gumina, J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993 75 3 386 392 8496205
13. Lumbar range of motion: influence of time of day and individual factors on measurements. FB Ensink PM Saur K Frese D Seeger J Hildebrandt, Spine 1996 21 11 1339 1343 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00012 8725926
14. The role of the lumbar spinal elements in flexion. VK Goel SJ Fromknecht K Nishiyama J Weinstein YK Liu, Spine 1985 10 6 516 523 10.1097/00007632- 198507000-00005 4081866
15. Kinematics of the whole lumbar spine: Effect of discectomy. VK Goel S Goyal C Clark K Nishiyama T Nye, Spine 1985 10 6 543 554 10.1097/00007632- 198507000-00008 4081869
16. Phase lag of the intersegmental motion in flexion-extension of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine: an in vivo study. M Kanayama K Abumi K Kaneda S Tadano T Ukai, Spine 1996 21 12 1416 1422 10.1097/00007632-199606150-00004 8792517
17. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. TG Mayer H Vanharanta RJ Gatchel V Mooney D Barnes L Judge S Smith A Terry, Spine 1989 14 1 33 36 10.1097/00007632-198901000-00006 2913665
18. Biomechanical analysis of anterior and posterior instrumentation systems after corpectomy. KR Gurr PC McAfee CM Shih, J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988 70 8 1182 1191 3417703
19. Stability of posterior spinal instrumentation and its effects on adjacent motion segments in the lumbosacral spine. Y Shono K Kaneda K Abumi PC McAfee BW Cunningham, Spine 1998 23 14 1550 1558 10.1097/00007632-199807150-00009 9682311
20. The Effect of sagittal alignment on adjacent joint mobility after lumbar instrumentation - a biomechanical study of lumbar vertebrae in a porcine model. WJ Chen PL Lai CL Tai LH Chen CC Niu, Clin Biomech 2004 19 8 763 768 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.05.010
21. The effect of interspinous ligament integrity on adjacent segment instability after lumbar instrumentation and laminectomy - an experimental study in porcine model. LH Chen PL Lai CL Tai CC Niu TS Fu WJ Chen, Biomed Mater Eng 2006 16 4 261 267 16971744
22. The use of a quadruped as an in vivo model for the study of the spine - biomechanical considerations. TH Smit, Eur Spine J 2002 11 2 137 144 10.1007/s005860100346 11956920
23. Intersegmental spinal flexibility with lumbosacral instrumentation - an in vitro biomechanical investigation. T Asazuma IAF Stokes MS Moreland N Suzuki, Spine 1990 15 11 1153 1158 10.1097/00007632-199011010-00013 2267610
24. Biomechanical role of lumbar spine ligaments in flexion and extension: determination using a parallel linkage robot and a porcine model. KA Gillespie JP Dickey, Spine 2004 29 11 1208 1216 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00010 15167660
25. Biomechanical analysis of three surgical approaches for lumbar burst fractures using short-segment instrumentation. GS Gurwitz JM Dawson MJ McNamara CF Federspiel DM Spengler, Spine 1993 18 8 977 982 10.1097/00007632-199306150- 00005 8367785
26. In vivo dynamic stiffness of the porcine lumbar spine exposed to cyclic loading: influence of load and degeneration. A Kaigle L Ekstrom S Holm M Rostedt T Hansson, J Spinal Disord 1998 11 1 65 70 10.1097/00002517-199802000-00010 9493772
27. Biomechanical analysis of screw load sharing in pedicle fixation of the lumbar spine. JP Kostuik E Munting A Valdevit, J Spinal Disord 1994 7 5 394 401 10.1097/00002517-199410000-00005 7819639
28. A reproducible porcine vertebral fracture for biomechanical testing of spinal fixation devices. GR Russell G Lavoie R Evenson M Moreau D Budney VJ Raso, Clin Orthop 1992 284 267 272 1395304
29. An in vitro biomechanical study of the effects of surgical modification upon the canine lumbosacral spine. MEH Smith TN Bebchuk CL Shmon LG Watson H Steinmetz, Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004 17 1 17 24
30. Pitfalls of biomechanical testing. JP Kostuik TJ Smith, Spine 1991 16 10 1233 5 10.1097/00007632-199110000-00017 1754943