Is there a future for XRF in twenty-first century archaeology?

X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry (XRF) in Geoarchaeology

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 193-202

  Joyce, Rosemary A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875674006     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6886-9_9     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bauer, A. (2002), Is What You See What You Get? Recognizing Meaning in Archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 2, 37-52.
2. Demattè, P. (2006), The Chinese Jade Age: Between Antiquarianism and Archaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology 6, 202-226.
3. Haslam, M. (2006), An Archaeology of the Instant? Action and Narrative in Microscopic Archaeological Residue Analysis. Journal of Social Archaeology 6, 402-424.
4. Jones, A. (2004), Archaeometry and Materiality: Materials-Based Analysis in Theory and Practice. Archaeometry 46, 327-338.
5. Jones, A. (2005), Lives in Fragments? Personhood and the European Neolithic. Journal of Social Archaeology 5, 193-224.
6. Joyce, R. A. (2007), Figurines, meaning, and meaning-making in early Mesoamerica. In C. Renfrew and I. Morley, Eds., Material Beginnings: A Global Prehistory of Figurative Representation, (pp. 107-116). Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
7. Joyce, R. A. (2008), Practice in and as deposition. In B. Mills and W. Walker, Eds, Memory Work, (pp. 25-40). Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
8. Journal of Social Archaeology Editors (2001), Editorial Statement. Journal of Social Archaeology 1, 5-12.
9. Keane, W. (2008), On the Materiality of Religion. Material Religion 4, 230-231.
10. Killick, D. (2004), Social Constructionist Approaches to the Study of Technology. World Archaeology 36, 571-578.
11. Knappett, C. (2002), Photographs, Skeumorphs and Marionettes: some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture 7, 97-117.
12. Lele, V. P. (2006), Material Habits, Identity, Semeiotic. Journal of Social Archaeology 6, 48-70.
13. Pollard, A. M., and Bray, P. (2007), A Bicycle Made for Two? The Integration of Scientific Techniques in Archaeological Interpretation. Annual Review of Anthropology 36, 245-259.
14. Preucel, R. W. (1995), The Postprocessual Condition. Journal of Archaeological Research 3, 147-175.
15. Preucel, R. W. (2005), Archaeological Semiotics. Malden: Blackwell.
16. Preucel, R. W. and Bauer, A. (2001), Archaeological Pragmatics. Norwegian Archaeological Review 34, 85-96.
17. Robin, C. (2002), Outside of Houses: The Practices of Everyday Life at Chan Nòohol, Belize. Journal of Social Archaeology 2, 245-268.
18. Sillar, B., and Tite, M. S. (2000), The Challenge of "Technological Choices" for Materials Science Approaches in Archaeology. Archaeometry 42, 2-20.
19. Silliman, S. (2001), Agency, Practical Politics, and the Archaeology of Culture Contact. Journal of Social Archaeology 1, 190-209.
20. Wallis, N. J. (2008), Networks of History and Memory: Creating a Nexus of Social Identities in Woodland Period Mounds on the Lower St. Johns River, Florida. Journal of Social Archaeology 8, 236-271.
21. White, C. D. (2005). Gendered Food Behaviour Among the Maya: Time, Place, Status and Ritual. Journal of Social Archaeology 5, 356-382.