Reply from the authors

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volumn 110, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 661-662

  Bjorne, H ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANESTHESIA; AORTA; AORTA FLOW; BLEEDING; BLOOD VESSEL TONE; COLORECTAL SURGERY; DIASTOLE; DOPPLER DEVICE; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; ESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER METHOD; FLUID THERAPY; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HIGH RISK PATIENT; LETTER; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MEASUREMENT; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; NOMOGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; THERMODILUTION; TIDAL VOLUME;

EID: 84875651155     PISSN: 00070912     EISSN: 14716771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aet039     Document Type: Letter

References (12)

1. Nordstrom J, Hallsjo-Sander C, Shore R, Bjorne H. Stroke volume optimization in elective bowel surgery: a comparison between pulse power wave analysis (LiDCOrapid) and oesophageal Doppler (CardioQ). Br J Anaesth 2013; 110: 374-80
2. Abbas SM, Hill AG. Systematic review of the literature for the use of oesophageal Doppler monitor for fluid replacement in major abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 2008; 63: 44-51
3. Dark PM, Singer M. The validity of trans-esophageal Doppler ultrasonography as a measure of cardiac output in critically ill adults. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30: 2060-6
4. Cecconi M, Rhodes A, Poloniecki J, Della Rocca G, Grounds RM. Bench-to-bedside review: the importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies - with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output. Crit Care 2009; 13: 201
5. Leather HA, Wouters PF. Oesophageal Doppler monitoring overestimates cardiac output during lumbar epidural anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2001; 86: 794-7
6. Schultz MJ, Haitsma JJ, Slutsky AS, Gajic O. What tidal volumes should be used in patients without acute lung injury? Anesthesiology 2007; 106: 1226-31
7. Lellouche F, Lipes J. Prophylactic protective ventilation: lower tidal volumes for all critically ill patients? Intensive Care Med 2013; 39: 6-15
8. Belloni L, Pisano A, Natale A, et al. Assessment of fluid-responsiveness parameters for off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison among LiDCO, transesophageal echochardiography, and pulmonary artery catheter. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 243-8
9. Hadian M, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR. The effects of vasoactive drugs on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in postoperative ventilated patients. J Crit Care 2011; 26: 328.e1-8
10. Wyffels PA, Sergeant P, Wouters PF. The value of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness during open chest surgery. Anaesthesia 2010; 65: 704-9
11. Pinsky MR. Probing the limits of arterial pulse contour analysis to predict preload responsiveness. Anesth Analg 2003; 96: 1245-7
12. Broch O, Renner J, Hocker J, et al. Uncalibrated pulse power analysis fails to reliably measure cardiac output in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Crit Care 2011; 15: R76