Percutaneous core biopsy of small renal mass lesions: A diagnostic tool to better stratify patients for surgical intervention

BJU International

Volumn 111, Issue 4 B, 2013, Pages

  Menogue, Stuart R ^a   O'Brien, Beverley A ^b,c   Brown, Alexandra L ^b   Cohen, Ronald J ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (Australia)

^b Tissugen Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^d Uropath Pty Ltd   (Australia)

Author keywords

core biopsy; diagnosis; management; renal; tumour

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY INJURY; KIDNEY METASTASIS; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MELANOMA METASTASIS; NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS BIOPSY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; TUMOR VOLUME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY, LARGE-CORE NEEDLE; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875646078     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11384.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Wang R, Li AY, Wood DP Jr,. The role of percutaneous renal biopsy in the management of small renal masses. Curr Urol Rep 2011; 12: 18-23
2. Hollingsworth J, Miller D, Daignault S, Hollenbeck B,. Rising incidence of small renal masses: a need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 1331-4
3. Duchene DA, Lotan Y, Cadeddu JA, Sagalowsky AI, Koeneman KS,. Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contemporary series. Urology 2003; 62: 827
4. Schachter LR, Cookson MS, Chang SS, et al,. Frequency of benign renal cortical tumors and histologic subtypes based on size in a contemporary series: what to tell our patients. J Endourol 2007; 21: 827-30
5. Volpe A, Kachura JR, Geddie WR, et al,. Techniques, safety and accuracy of sampling of renal tumors by fine needle aspiration and core biopsy-review. J Urol 2007; 178: 819-23
6. Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Andre M, Daniel L, Coulange C,. Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol 2004; 171: 1802-5
7. Volpe A, Mattar K, Finelli A, et al,. Contemporary results of percutaneous biopsy of 100 small renal masses: a single center experience. J Urol 2008; 180: 2333-7
8. Wang R, Wolf JS Jr, Wood DP Jr, Higgins EJ, Hafez KS,. Accuracy of percutaneous core biopsy in management of small renal masses. Urology 2009; 73: 586-90
9. Leveridge MJ, Finelli A, Kachura JR, et al,. Outcomes of small renal mass needle core biopsy, nondiagnostic percutaneous biopsy, and the role of repeat biopsy. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 578-84
10. Vasudevan A, Davies RJ, Shannon B, Cohen RJ,. Incidental renal tumors: the frequency of benign lesions and the role of pre-operative core biopsy. BJU Int 2006; 97: 946-9
11. Shannon B, Cohen R, de Bruto H, Davies R,. The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses. J Urol 2008; 180: 1257-61
12. Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG,. Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma-a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 2008; 179: 1227-33. Review
13. Volpe A, Cadeddu JA, Cestari A, et al,. Contemporary management of small renal masses. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 501-15. Review
14. Heuer R, Gill IS, Guazzoni G, et al,. A critical analysis of the actual role of minimally invasive surgery and active surveillance for kidney cancer. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 223-32. Review
15. Huang WC, Levey AS, Serio AM, et al,. Chronic kidney disease after nephrectomy in patients with renal cortical tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 735
16. Guidelines for the clinical management of Clinical Stage 1 renal masses. American Urological Association 2007.
17. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE,. Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Eng J Med 2004; 351: 1296
18. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W, et al,. A prospective, randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 543-52
19. Pasticier G, Timsit MO, Badet L, et al,. Nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma: detailed analysis of complications over a 15-year period. Eur Urol 2006; 49: 485-90
20. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC, et al,. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 2008; 179: 2158-63
21. Clark MA, Shikanov S, Raman JD, et al,. Chronic kidney disease before and after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2011; 185: 43-8
22. Van Poppel H,. Efficacy and safety of nephron-sparing surgery. Int J Urol 2010; 17: 314-26. Review
23. Jewett MA, Mattar K, Basiuk J, et al,. Active surveillance of small renal masses: progression patterns of early stage kidney cancer. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 39-44
24. Chawla S, Crispen P, Hanlon A, Greenberg R, Chen D, Uzzo R,. The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature. J Urol 2006; 175: 425-31
25. Abouassaly R, Yang S, Finelli A, Kulkarni GS, Alibhai SM,. What is the best treatment strategy for incidentally detected small renal masses? A decision analysis. BJU Int 2011; 108: E223-31
26. Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, et al,. Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival with partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008; 179: 468-71