-
1
-
-
38749111781
-
Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens' deliberation
-
Paul C, Nicholls R, Priest P, McGee R. Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens' deliberation. Health Policy. 2008;85(3):314-320.
-
(2008)
Health Policy
, vol.85
, Issue.3
, pp. 314-320
-
-
Paul, C.1
Nicholls, R.2
Priest, P.3
McGee, R.4
-
2
-
-
73949131108
-
The benefits and harms of mammography screening: Understanding the trade-offs
-
Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs. JAMA. 2010;303(2):164-165.
-
(2010)
JAMA
, vol.303
, Issue.2
, pp. 164-165
-
-
Woloshin, S.1
Schwartz, L.M.2
-
3
-
-
77957568827
-
Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: The DECISIONS survey
-
Hoffman RM, Lewis CL, Pignone MP, et al. Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:53s-64s.
-
(2010)
Med Decis Making
, vol.30
-
-
Hoffman, R.M.1
Lewis, C.L.2
Pignone, M.P.3
-
4
-
-
84875586172
-
-
The Jefferson Center. Accessed May 17 2012
-
The Jefferson Center. Citizens Jury Process. http://www.jefferson-center. org/. Accessed May 17, 2012.
-
Citizens Jury Process
-
-
-
5
-
-
49249098897
-
Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development
-
doi:10.1186/1743-8462-5-16
-
Gregory J, Hartz-Karp J, Watson R. Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008;5:16. doi:10.1186/1743-8462-5-16
-
(2008)
Aust New Zealand Health Policy
, vol.5
, pp. 16
-
-
Gregory, J.1
Hartz-Karp, J.2
Watson, R.3
-
6
-
-
0343750712
-
The theory and practice of citizens' juries
-
Smith G, Wales C. The theory and practice of citizens' juries. Policy & Politics 1999;27(3): 295-308.
-
(1999)
Policy & Politics
, vol.27
, Issue.3
, pp. 295-308
-
-
Smith, G.1
Wales, C.2
-
7
-
-
84875595321
-
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Accessed April 17 2012
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Using Deliberative Methods to Engage Patients, Consumers and the Public. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq. gov/index.cfm/slide-presentation-deliberative-methods/transcript- usingdeliberative- methods-webinar/. Accessed April 17, 2012.
-
Using Deliberative Methods to Engage Patients, Consumers and the Public
-
-
-
8
-
-
84864294077
-
What is public deliberation?
-
Blacksher E, Diebel A, Pierre-Gerlier F, Dorr Goold S, Abelson J. What is public deliberation?. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(2):14-16.
-
(2012)
Hastings Cent Rep
, vol.42
, Issue.2
, pp. 14-16
-
-
Blacksher, E.1
Diebel, A.2
Pierre-Gerlier, F.3
Dorr Goold, S.4
Abelson, J.5
-
9
-
-
33646682159
-
Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics
-
Goodin RE, Dryzek JS. Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics & Society. 2006;34(2):219-244.
-
(2006)
Politics & Society
, vol.34
, Issue.2
, pp. 219-244
-
-
Goodin, R.E.1
Dryzek, J.S.2
-
12
-
-
79959604235
-
Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach
-
Bombard Y, Abelson J, Simeonov D, Gauvin FP. Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(1):135-144.
-
(2011)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.73
, Issue.1
, pp. 135-144
-
-
Bombard, Y.1
Abelson, J.2
Simeonov, D.3
Gauvin, F.P.4
-
13
-
-
84875591866
-
-
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Accessed May 2 2012
-
National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. About NICE: Citizens Council. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/citizenscouncil/ citizens-council.jsp. Accessed May 2, 2012.
-
About NICE: Citizens Council
-
-
-
14
-
-
34247188454
-
Bringing "the public" into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice
-
Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP. Bringing "the public" into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82(1):37-50.
-
(2007)
Health Policy
, vol.82
, Issue.1
, pp. 37-50
-
-
Abelson, J.1
Giacomini, M.2
Lehoux, P.3
Gauvin, F.P.4
-
15
-
-
84875618925
-
-
European Network for Health Technology Assessment. Accessed March 29 2012
-
European Network for Health Technology Assessment. HTA Core Model for Screening Technologies. http://www.eunethta.eu/upload/WP4/Public%20consultation/ HTA-Screening-model-2nd%20public%20 draft.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2012.
-
HTA Core Model for Screening Technologies
-
-
-
17
-
-
84864322520
-
Why and when should we use public deliberation?
-
Solomon S, Abelson J. Why and when should we use public deliberation? Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(2):17-20.
-
(2012)
Hastings Cent Rep
, vol.42
, Issue.2
, pp. 17-20
-
-
Solomon, S.1
Abelson, J.2
-
18
-
-
0030788150
-
The Oregon health plan-lessons for the nation
-
Bodenheimer T. The Oregon health plan-lessons for the nation. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(9):651-656.
-
(1997)
N Engl J Med
, vol.337
, Issue.9
, pp. 651-656
-
-
Bodenheimer, T.1
-
19
-
-
84864311645
-
Implementing a public deliberative forum
-
O'Doherty K, Gauvin FP, Grogan C, Friedman W. Implementing a public deliberative forum. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(1):20-23.
-
(2012)
Hastings Cent Rep
, vol.42
, Issue.1
, pp. 20-23
-
-
O'doherty, K.1
Gauvin, F.P.2
Grogan, C.3
Friedman, W.4
-
20
-
-
78651281313
-
Public good, personal privacy: A citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research
-
Parkin L, Paul C. Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(2):150-156.
-
(2011)
J Epidemiol Community Health
, vol.65
, Issue.2
, pp. 150-156
-
-
Parkin, L.1
Paul, C.2
-
21
-
-
84875617179
-
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Accessed October 31 2012
-
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Community Forum. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/who-is-involved-in-the- effectivehealth- care-program1/ahrq-community-forum/. Accessed October 31, 2012.
-
AHRQ Community Forum
-
-
-
22
-
-
84864322914
-
The future of public deliberation on health issues
-
Abelson J, Warren M, Forest P-G. The future of public deliberation on health issues. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(2):27-29.
-
(2012)
Hastings Cent Rep
, vol.42
, Issue.2
, pp. 27-29
-
-
Abelson, J.1
Warren, M.2
Forest, P.-G.3
-
23
-
-
84859864850
-
Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda
-
The Patient-Centered Outcomes
-
Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1583-1584.
-
(2012)
JAMA
, vol.307
, Issue.15
, pp. 1583-1584
-
-
Selby, J.V.1
Beal, A.C.2
Frank, L.3
-
24
-
-
84872470441
-
-
Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Accessed October 29 2012
-
Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. http://www.pcori.org/what-we-do/pcor/. Accessed October 29, 2012.
-
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
-
-
-
25
-
-
69649089947
-
Fair process and the redundancy of bioethics: A polemic
-
Ashcroft R. Fair process and the redundancy of bioethics: a polemic. Public Health Ethics. 2008;1(1):3.
-
(2008)
Public Health Ethics
, vol.1
, Issue.1
, pp. 3
-
-
Ashcroft, R.1
-
27
-
-
37849038935
-
From group member to democratic citizen: How deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes
-
Gastil J, Black LW, Deess EP, Leighter J. From group member to democratic citizen: how deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes. Hum Commun Res. 2008;34(1):137-169.
-
(2008)
Hum Commun Res
, vol.34
, Issue.1
, pp. 137-169
-
-
Gastil, J.1
Black, L.W.2
Deess, E.P.3
Leighter, J.4
-
29
-
-
84875634920
-
-
Scan Directory.com. Accessed April 17 2012
-
Scan Directory.com. Why Get a Scan? http://www.scandirectory.com/content/ why-get-a-body-scan.asp. Accessed April 17, 2012.
-
Why Get A Scan?
-
-
-
30
-
-
84861408195
-
Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening
-
Jacobsen KK, von Euler-Chelpin M. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening. J Public Health. 2012;34(2):272-278.
-
(2012)
J Public Health
, vol.34
, Issue.2
, pp. 272-278
-
-
Jacobsen, K.K.1
Von Euler-Chelpin, M.2
-
31
-
-
69949186007
-
Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe
-
Gigerenzer G, Mata J, Frank R. Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(17):1216- 1220.
-
(2009)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.101
, Issue.17
, pp. 1216-1220
-
-
Gigerenzer, G.1
Mata, J.2
Frank, R.3
-
32
-
-
0345967846
-
Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States
-
Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291(1):71-78.
-
(2004)
JAMA
, vol.291
, Issue.1
, pp. 71-78
-
-
Schwartz, L.M.1
Woloshin, S.2
Fowler, F.J.3
Welch, H.G.4
-
33
-
-
84857724590
-
Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States
-
Wegwarth O, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Gaissmaier W, Gigerenzer G. Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):340-349.
-
(2012)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.156
, Issue.5
, pp. 340-349
-
-
Wegwarth, O.1
Schwartz, L.M.2
Woloshin, S.3
Gaissmaier, W.4
Gigerenzer, G.5
-
34
-
-
0031471248
-
The prostatic imperative and the social relations of medical technology
-
Willis E. The prostatic imperative and the social relations of medical technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13(4):602-612.
-
(1997)
Int J Technol Assess Health Care
, vol.13
, Issue.4
, pp. 602-612
-
-
Willis, E.1
-
35
-
-
84857507753
-
Resisting the screening imperative: Patienthood, populations and politics in prostate cancer detection technologies for the UK
-
Faulkner A. Resisting the screening imperative: patienthood, populations and politics in prostate cancer detection technologies for the UK. Sociol Health Illn. 2012;34(2):221-233.
-
(2012)
Sociol Health Illn
, vol.34
, Issue.2
, pp. 221-233
-
-
Faulkner, A.1
-
36
-
-
84857774244
-
Screening tests
-
New York: Cambridge University Press
-
Newman TB, Kohn MA. Screening tests. Evidence-based diagnosis. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:116-137.
-
(2009)
Evidence-based Diagnosis
, pp. 116-137
-
-
Newman, T.B.1
Kohn, M.A.2
-
37
-
-
84857462763
-
UK patients are given advice on private screening
-
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5394
-
Cole A. UK patients are given advice on private screening. BMJ. 2010;341:c5394. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5394.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.341
-
-
Cole, A.1
-
38
-
-
79958163807
-
New recommendations on mammography and cervical cancer screening disrupt US health reform debate
-
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5012
-
Tanne JH. New recommendations on mammography and cervical cancer screening disrupt US health reform debate. BMJ. 2009;339:b5012. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5012.
-
(2009)
BMJ
, vol.339
-
-
Tanne, J.H.1
-
40
-
-
79960482424
-
Breast cancer screening: A 35-year perspective
-
Fletcher SW. Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):165-175.
-
(2011)
Epidemiol Rev
, vol.33
, Issue.1
, pp. 165-175
-
-
Fletcher, S.W.1
-
41
-
-
84857479596
-
The sociology of medical screening: Past, present and future
-
Armstrong N, Eborall H. The sociology of medical screening: past, present and future. Sociol Health Illn. 2012;34(2):161-176.
-
(2012)
Sociol Health Illn
, vol.34
, Issue.2
, pp. 161-176
-
-
Armstrong, N.1
Eborall, H.2
-
43
-
-
84859357955
-
Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: Results from the Norwegian screening program
-
Kalager M, Adami H-O, Bretthauer M, Tamimi RM. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):491-499.
-
(2012)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.156
, Issue.7
, pp. 491-499
-
-
Kalager, M.1
Adami, H.-O.2
Bretthauer, M.3
Tamimi, R.M.4
-
44
-
-
84874646183
-
Endless screenings don't bring everlasting health
-
April 16
-
Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Endless screenings don't bring everlasting health. New York Times. April 16, 2012:D5.
-
(2012)
New York Times
-
-
Schwartz, L.M.1
Woloshin, S.2
-
45
-
-
0347662336
-
To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: Primary care physicians' use of the PSA test
-
Cooper CP, Merritt TL, Ross LE, John LV, Jorgensen CM. To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians' use of the PSA test. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):182-191.
-
(2004)
Prev Med
, vol.38
, Issue.2
, pp. 182-191
-
-
Cooper, C.P.1
Merritt, T.L.2
Ross, L.E.3
John, L.V.4
Jorgensen, C.M.5
-
46
-
-
61849137123
-
Breast screening: The facts or maybe not
-
doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmj.b86
-
Gotzsche PC, Hartling OJ, Nielsen M, Brodersen J, Jorgensen KJ. Breast screening: the facts or maybe not. BMJ. 2009;338:b86. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmj.b86.
-
(2009)
BMJ
, vol.338
-
-
Gotzsche, P.C.1
Hartling, O.J.2
Nielsen, M.3
Brodersen, J.4
Jorgensen, K.J.5
-
47
-
-
78049511208
-
Breast cancer awareness month. Still awaiting screening facts
-
doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmj.c6152
-
Baum M, Thornton H, Gotzsche PC, et al. Breast cancer awareness month. Still awaiting screening facts. BMJ. 2010;341:c6152. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmj.c6152.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.341
-
-
Baum, M.1
Thornton, H.2
Gotzsche, P.C.3
-
48
-
-
79951629143
-
Critics attack new NHS breast screening leaflet for failing to address harms
-
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj. c7267
-
Mayor S. Critics attack new NHS breast screening leaflet for failing to address harms. BMJ. 2010;341:c7267. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj. c7267.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.341
-
-
Mayor, S.1
-
49
-
-
84859361181
-
Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: Time to tackle an underappreciated harm
-
Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: time to tackle an underappreciated harm. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(7): 536-537.
-
(2012)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.157
, Issue.7
, pp. 536-537
-
-
Elmore, J.G.1
Fletcher, S.W.2
-
50
-
-
4744340737
-
Adolescent and young adult women's misunderstanding of the term pap smear
-
Blake DR, Weber BM, Fletcher KE. Adolescent and young adult women's misunderstanding of the term pap smear. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(10):966-970.
-
(2004)
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med
, vol.158
, Issue.10
, pp. 966-970
-
-
Blake, D.R.1
Weber, B.M.2
Fletcher, K.E.3
-
51
-
-
27744516946
-
Poor knowledge regarding the pap test among low-income women undergoing routine screening
-
Breitkopf CR, Pearson HC, Breitkopf DM. Poor knowledge regarding the pap test among low-income women undergoing routine screening. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005;37(2):78-84.
-
(2005)
Perspect Sex Reprod Health
, vol.37
, Issue.2
, pp. 78-84
-
-
Breitkopf, C.R.1
Pearson, H.C.2
Breitkopf, D.M.3
-
52
-
-
0033631203
-
Informed consent for screening by community sampling
-
Irwig L, Glasziou P. Informed consent for screening by community sampling. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3(1):47-50.
-
(2000)
Eff Clin Pract
, vol.3
, Issue.1
, pp. 47-50
-
-
Irwig, L.1
Glasziou, P.2
-
53
-
-
33646827017
-
Screening and choice- informed choice for screening: Implications for evaluation
-
Irwig L, McCaffery K, Salkeld G, Bossuyt P. Screening and choice- informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation. BMJ. 2006;332(7550):1148-1150.
-
(2006)
BMJ
, vol.332
, Issue.7550
, pp. 1148-1150
-
-
Irwig, L.1
McCaffery, K.2
Salkeld, G.3
Bossuyt, P.4
-
54
-
-
43949086861
-
The ethics of information: Absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening
-
Schwartz PH, Meslin EM. The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(6):867-870.
-
(2008)
J Gen Intern Med
, vol.23
, Issue.6
, pp. 867-870
-
-
Schwartz, P.H.1
Meslin, E.M.2
-
55
-
-
34547181428
-
Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: A qualitative study in the UK
-
Jepson RG, Hewison J, Thompson A, Weller D. Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(5):890-899.
-
(2007)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.65
, Issue.5
, pp. 890-899
-
-
Jepson, R.G.1
Hewison, J.2
Thompson, A.3
Weller, D.4
-
56
-
-
52649138404
-
Communicating about screening
-
Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, et al. Communicating about screening. BMJ. 2008;337(7673):3.
-
(2008)
BMJ
, vol.337
, Issue.7673
, pp. 3
-
-
Entwistle, V.A.1
Carter, S.M.2
Trevena, L.3
-
57
-
-
84856593040
-
Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening
-
Stefanek ME. Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(24): 1821-1826.
-
(2011)
J Natl Cancer Inst
, vol.103
, Issue.24
, pp. 1821-1826
-
-
Stefanek, M.E.1
-
58
-
-
34047155525
-
Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making
-
Krist AH, Woolf SH, Johnson RE, Kerns JW. Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(2):112-119.
-
(2007)
Ann Fam Med
, vol.5
, Issue.2
, pp. 112-119
-
-
Krist, A.H.1
Woolf, S.H.2
Johnson, R.E.3
Kerns, J.W.4
-
59
-
-
18844430597
-
The liability of giving patients a choice: Shared decision making and prostate cancer
-
Woolf SH, Krist A. The liability of giving patients a choice: shared decision making and prostate cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71(10):1871-1872.
-
(2005)
Am Fam Physician
, vol.71
, Issue.10
, pp. 1871-1872
-
-
Woolf, S.H.1
Krist, A.2
-
60
-
-
22344446847
-
Not all patients want to participate in decision making - A national study of public preferences
-
Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making-a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):531-535.
-
(2005)
J Gen Intern Med
, vol.20
, Issue.6
, pp. 531-535
-
-
Levinson, W.1
Kao, A.2
Kuby, A.3
Thisted, R.A.4
-
65
-
-
0018272361
-
Epidemiology for the uninitiated: Screening
-
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6149.1417
-
Rose G, Barker DJP. Epidemiology for the uninitiated: screening. BMJ. 1978;2:1417. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6149.1417.
-
(1978)
BMJ
, vol.2
, pp. 1417
-
-
Rose, G.1
Barker, D.J.P.2
-
66
-
-
84863961968
-
Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
-
Moyer VA. Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2): 120-134.
-
(2012)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.157
, Issue.2
, pp. 120-134
-
-
Moyer, V.A.1
-
67
-
-
33645501981
-
Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: 1 in 4 cancers detected by mammography are pseudocancers
-
Welch HG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: 1 in 4 cancers detected by mammography are pseudocancers. BMJ. 2006;332(7543):727.
-
(2006)
BMJ
, vol.332
, Issue.7543
, pp. 727
-
-
Welch, H.G.1
Schwartz, L.M.2
Woloshin, S.3
-
69
-
-
84869083222
-
The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: An t independent review
-
Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening
-
Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 2012;380(9855):1778- 1786.
-
(2012)
Lancet
, vol.380
, Issue.9855
, pp. 1778-1786
-
-
-
70
-
-
0029811970
-
Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs
-
Marshall KG. Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;155(4):377-383.
-
(1996)
Can Med Assoc J
, vol.155
, Issue.4
, pp. 377-383
-
-
Marshall, K.G.1
-
71
-
-
78751648135
-
Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part II: Evidence summaries
-
Silvestre MAA, Dans LF, Dans AL. Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part II: evidence summaries. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(3):240-249.
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, Issue.3
, pp. 240-249
-
-
Silvestre, M.A.A.1
Dans, L.F.2
Dans, A.L.3
-
72
-
-
78751645621
-
Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part I: General principles
-
Dans LF, Silvestre MA, Dans AL. Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part I: general principles. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(3):231-239.
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, Issue.3
, pp. 231-239
-
-
Dans, L.F.1
Silvestre, M.A.2
Dans, A.L.3
-
73
-
-
34247266663
-
Systematic review: The long-term effects of false-positive mammograms
-
Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(7):502-510.
-
(2007)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.146
, Issue.7
, pp. 502-510
-
-
Brewer, N.T.1
Salz, T.2
Lillie, S.E.3
-
74
-
-
34547655642
-
MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: A prospective observational study
-
Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):485-492.
-
(2007)
Lancet
, vol.370
, Issue.9586
, pp. 485-492
-
-
Kuhl, C.K.1
Schrading, S.2
Bieling, H.B.3
-
75
-
-
36549024011
-
Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial?
-
Thorat MA. Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial? Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1902.
-
(2007)
Lancet
, vol.370
, Issue.9603
, pp. 1902
-
-
Thorat, M.A.1
-
76
-
-
36549048938
-
Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial?
-
Thornton H. Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial? The Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1903.
-
(2007)
The Lancet
, vol.370
, Issue.9603
, pp. 1903
-
-
Thornton, H.1
-
77
-
-
42649131070
-
MRI breast screening? Authors' reply
-
Kuhl C, Bieling HB, Wardelmann E, Kuhn W, Schild HH. MRI breast screening? Authors' reply. Lancet. 2008;371(9622):1416.
-
(2008)
Lancet
, vol.371
, Issue.9622
, pp. 1416
-
-
Kuhl, C.1
Bieling, H.B.2
Wardelmann, E.3
Kuhn, W.4
Schild, H.H.5
-
78
-
-
0032919541
-
"With the best of reasons": Cervical cancer prevention policy and the suppression of sexual risk factor information
-
Braun V, Gavey N. "With the best of reasons": cervical cancer prevention policy and the suppression of sexual risk factor information. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(10):1463-1474.
-
(1999)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.48
, Issue.10
, pp. 1463-1474
-
-
Braun, V.1
Gavey, N.2
-
79
-
-
0035019336
-
Information about screening-is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?
-
Raffle AE. Information about screening-is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? Health Expect. 2001;4(2):92-98.
-
(2001)
Health Expect
, vol.4
, Issue.2
, pp. 92-98
-
-
Raffle, A.E.1
-
81
-
-
23244435888
-
Regret in cancer-related decisions
-
Connolly T, Reb J. Regret in cancer-related decisions. Health Psychol. 2005;24(4):S29-S34.
-
(2005)
Health Psychol
, vol.24
, Issue.4
-
-
Connolly, T.1
Reb, J.2
-
82
-
-
0033153782
-
Cervical screening, compliance and moral obligation
-
Howson A. Cervical screening, compliance and moral obligation. Sociol Health Illn. 1999;21(4):401-425.
-
(1999)
Sociol Health Illn
, vol.21
, Issue.4
, pp. 401-425
-
-
Howson, A.1
-
86
-
-
84865025988
-
-
US Preventive Services Task Force. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05118-EF, Accessed January 18 2011
-
US Preventive Services Task Force. US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05118-EF. http://www. uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/methods/procmanual.htm. Accessed January 18, 2011.
-
US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual
-
-
-
87
-
-
79960476408
-
Overview of screening: Where we are and where we may be headed
-
Harris R. Overview of screening: where we are and where we may be headed. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):1-6.
-
(2011)
Epidemiol Rev
, vol.33
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-6
-
-
Harris, R.1
-
88
-
-
84875631626
-
-
Accessed May 25
-
Currow D, Armstrong B. PSA Needs Order. http://www.mjainsight.com. au/view?post=david-currow-bruce-armstrong-psa-needs-order&post-id= 6489&cat=comment. Accessed May 25, 2012.
-
PSA Needs Order
, vol.2012
-
-
Currow, D.1
Armstrong, B.2
-
89
-
-
72049100691
-
Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
-
US Preventive Services Task Force
-
US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):716.
-
(2009)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.151
, Issue.10
, pp. 716
-
-
-
91
-
-
81855227059
-
Prostate-cancer screening-what the US Preventive Services Task Force left out
-
doi: 10.056/NEJMp1112191
-
Brett AS, Ablin RJ. Prostate-cancer screening-what the US Preventive Services Task Force left out. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1949-1951 doi: 10.056/NEJMp1112191.
-
(2011)
N Engl J Med
, vol.365
, pp. 1949-1951
-
-
Brett, A.S.1
Ablin, R.J.2
-
92
-
-
84863887100
-
What the US Preventive Services Task Force missed in its prostate cancer screening recommendation
-
Catalona WJ, D'Amico AV, Fitzgibbons WF, et al. What the US Preventive Services Task Force missed in its prostate cancer screening recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):137-138.
-
(2012)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.157
, Issue.2
, pp. 137-138
-
-
Catalona, W.J.1
D'amico, A.V.2
Fitzgibbons, W.F.3
-
93
-
-
85007664269
-
The PSA storm: Questioning cancer screening can be a risky business in America
-
Yamey G, Wilkes M. The PSA storm: questioning cancer screening can be a risky business in America. BMJ. 2002;324(7334):431.
-
(2002)
BMJ
, vol.324
, Issue.7334
, pp. 431
-
-
Yamey, G.1
Wilkes, M.2
-
94
-
-
77955611696
-
The great prostate mistake
-
March 10
-
Ablin RJ. The great prostate mistake. New York Times. March 10, 2010:A27.
-
(2010)
New York Times
, vol.A27
-
-
Ablin, R.J.1
-
95
-
-
70350596110
-
Screening for prostate cancer: Controversy? What controversy?
-
Ablin RJ, Haythorn MR. Screening for prostate cancer: controversy? What controversy? Curr Oncol. 2009;16(3):1-2.
-
(2009)
Curr Oncol
, vol.16
, Issue.3
, pp. 1-2
-
-
Ablin, R.J.1
Haythorn, M.R.2
-
96
-
-
81855206806
-
Screening for prostate cancer: A review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force
-
Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(11):762-771.
-
(2011)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.155
, Issue.11
, pp. 762-771
-
-
Chou, R.1
Croswell, J.M.2
Dana, T.3
-
97
-
-
84858212484
-
Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 Years of follow-up
-
Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 Years of follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):981-990.
-
(2012)
N Engl J Med
, vol.366
, Issue.11
, pp. 981-990
-
-
Schröder, F.H.1
Hugosson, J.2
Roobol, M.J.3
-
98
-
-
81855218123
-
Stratifying risk - The US Preventive Services Task Force and prostate-cancer screening
-
Schröder FH. Stratifying risk-the US Preventive Services Task Force and prostate-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1953-1955.
-
(2011)
N Engl J Med
, vol.365
, pp. 1953-1955
-
-
Schröder, F.H.1
-
99
-
-
81855212606
-
One man at a time-resolving the PSA controversy
-
doi: 10.056/NEJMp11112140
-
McNaughton-Collins MF, Barry MJ. One man at a time-resolving the PSA controversy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1951-1953 doi: 10.056/NEJMp11112140.
-
(2011)
N Engl J Med
, vol.365
, pp. 1951-1953
-
-
McNaughton-Collins, M.F.1
Barry, M.J.2
-
100
-
-
77954612931
-
Screening for breast cancer: Balancing the debate
-
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3106
-
McPherson K. Screening for breast cancer: balancing the debate. BMJ. 2010;340:c3106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3106.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
-
-
McPherson, K.1
-
101
-
-
76149102565
-
Revealing Oz behind the curtain: USPSTF screening mammography guidelines and the hot air balloon
-
Javitt MC, Hendrick RE. Revealing Oz behind the curtain: USPSTF screening mammography guidelines and the hot air balloon. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):289-290.
-
(2010)
Am J Roentgenol
, vol.194
, Issue.2
, pp. 289-290
-
-
Javitt, M.C.1
Hendrick, R.E.2
-
102
-
-
84875594983
-
Breast screening should be scrapped. Evidence points to the fact that cancer mortality rates are dropping due to improved treatment, not mammograms
-
Accessed January 8 2013 August 2
-
Baum M. Breast screening should be scrapped. Evidence points to the fact that cancer mortality rates are dropping due to improved treatment, not mammograms. The Guardian. August 2, 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/ commentisfree/2011/aug/02/breast-cancer-screening. Accessed January 8, 2013.
-
(2011)
The Guardian
-
-
Baum, M.1
-
103
-
-
81555216021
-
Effect of population based screening on breast cancer mortality
-
Bock K, Borisch B, Cawson J, et al. Effect of population based screening on breast cancer mortality. Lancet. 2011;378(9805):1775-1776
-
(2011)
Lancet
, vol.378
, Issue.9805
, pp. 1775-1776
-
-
Bock, K.1
Borisch, B.2
Cawson, J.3
-
104
-
-
84857827076
-
Opposing views: Do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: Yes
-
Roder DM, Olver IN. Opposing views: do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: yes. Med J Aust. 2012;196(1):16.
-
(2012)
Med J Aust
, vol.196
, Issue.1
, pp. 16
-
-
Roder, D.M.1
Olver, I.N.2
-
105
-
-
84857884638
-
Opposing views: Do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: No
-
Bell RJ, Burton RC. Opposing views: do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: no. Med J Aust. 2012;169(1):17.
-
(2012)
Med J Aust
, vol.169
, Issue.1
, pp. 17
-
-
Bell, R.J.1
Burton, R.C.2
-
106
-
-
0017771912
-
Breast cancer screening: A view from outside the controversy
-
Thier SO. Breast cancer screening: a view from outside the controversy. N Engl J Med. 1977;275(19):1063-1065.
-
(1977)
N Engl J Med
, vol.275
, Issue.19
, pp. 1063-1065
-
-
Thier, S.O.1
-
107
-
-
84875595984
-
Get a mammogram. No don't. Repeat
-
November 21
-
Kolata G. Get a mammogram. No don't. Repeat. New York Times. November 21, 2009:WK4.
-
(2009)
New York Times
, vol.WK4
-
-
Kolata, G.1
-
108
-
-
0033178111
-
Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the riskassessment battlefield
-
Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the riskassessment battlefield. Risk Anal. 1999;19(4):689-701.
-
(1999)
Risk Anal
, vol.19
, Issue.4
, pp. 689-701
-
-
Slovic, P.1
-
109
-
-
79953758311
-
Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?
-
Flitcroft K, Gillespie J, Salkeld G, Carter S, Trevena L. Getting evidence into policy: the need for deliberative strategies? Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(7):1039-1046.
-
(2011)
Soc Sci Med
, vol.72
, Issue.7
, pp. 1039-1046
-
-
Flitcroft, K.1
Gillespie, J.2
Salkeld, G.3
Carter, S.4
Trevena, L.5
|