메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 105, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 380-386

Enhancing citizen engagement in cancer screening through deliberative democracy

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INTESTINE CANCER; MAMMOGRAPHY; POLITICAL SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 84875626979     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs649     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (54)

References (109)
  • 1
    • 38749111781 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens' deliberation
    • Paul C, Nicholls R, Priest P, McGee R. Making policy decisions about population screening for breast cancer: The role of citizens' deliberation. Health Policy. 2008;85(3):314-320.
    • (2008) Health Policy , vol.85 , Issue.3 , pp. 314-320
    • Paul, C.1    Nicholls, R.2    Priest, P.3    McGee, R.4
  • 2
    • 73949131108 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The benefits and harms of mammography screening: Understanding the trade-offs
    • Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs. JAMA. 2010;303(2):164-165.
    • (2010) JAMA , vol.303 , Issue.2 , pp. 164-165
    • Woloshin, S.1    Schwartz, L.M.2
  • 3
    • 77957568827 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: The DECISIONS survey
    • Hoffman RM, Lewis CL, Pignone MP, et al. Decision-making processes for breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer screening: the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making. 2010;30:53s-64s.
    • (2010) Med Decis Making , vol.30
    • Hoffman, R.M.1    Lewis, C.L.2    Pignone, M.P.3
  • 4
    • 84875586172 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Jefferson Center. Accessed May 17 2012
    • The Jefferson Center. Citizens Jury Process. http://www.jefferson-center. org/. Accessed May 17, 2012.
    • Citizens Jury Process
  • 5
    • 49249098897 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development
    • doi:10.1186/1743-8462-5-16
    • Gregory J, Hartz-Karp J, Watson R. Using deliberative techniques to engage the community in policy development. Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2008;5:16. doi:10.1186/1743-8462-5-16
    • (2008) Aust New Zealand Health Policy , vol.5 , pp. 16
    • Gregory, J.1    Hartz-Karp, J.2    Watson, R.3
  • 6
    • 0343750712 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The theory and practice of citizens' juries
    • Smith G, Wales C. The theory and practice of citizens' juries. Policy & Politics 1999;27(3): 295-308.
    • (1999) Policy & Politics , vol.27 , Issue.3 , pp. 295-308
    • Smith, G.1    Wales, C.2
  • 7
    • 84875595321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Accessed April 17 2012
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Using Deliberative Methods to Engage Patients, Consumers and the Public. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq. gov/index.cfm/slide-presentation-deliberative-methods/transcript- usingdeliberative- methods-webinar/. Accessed April 17, 2012.
    • Using Deliberative Methods to Engage Patients, Consumers and the Public
  • 9
    • 33646682159 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Deliberative impacts: The macro-political uptake of mini-publics
    • Goodin RE, Dryzek JS. Deliberative impacts: the macro-political uptake of mini-publics. Politics & Society. 2006;34(2):219-244.
    • (2006) Politics & Society , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 219-244
    • Goodin, R.E.1    Dryzek, J.S.2
  • 12
    • 79959604235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach
    • Bombard Y, Abelson J, Simeonov D, Gauvin FP. Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach. Soc Sci Med. 2011;73(1):135-144.
    • (2011) Soc Sci Med , vol.73 , Issue.1 , pp. 135-144
    • Bombard, Y.1    Abelson, J.2    Simeonov, D.3    Gauvin, F.P.4
  • 13
    • 84875591866 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Accessed May 2 2012
    • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. About NICE: Citizens Council. http://www.nice.org.uk/aboutnice/howwework/citizenscouncil/ citizens-council.jsp. Accessed May 2, 2012.
    • About NICE: Citizens Council
  • 14
    • 34247188454 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bringing "the public" into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: From principles to practice
    • Abelson J, Giacomini M, Lehoux P, Gauvin FP. Bringing "the public" into health technology assessment and coverage policy decisions: from principles to practice. Health Policy. 2007;82(1):37-50.
    • (2007) Health Policy , vol.82 , Issue.1 , pp. 37-50
    • Abelson, J.1    Giacomini, M.2    Lehoux, P.3    Gauvin, F.P.4
  • 15
    • 84875618925 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • European Network for Health Technology Assessment. Accessed March 29 2012
    • European Network for Health Technology Assessment. HTA Core Model for Screening Technologies. http://www.eunethta.eu/upload/WP4/Public%20consultation/ HTA-Screening-model-2nd%20public%20 draft.pdf. Accessed March 29, 2012.
    • HTA Core Model for Screening Technologies
  • 16
    • 84864296485 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is good public deliberation? 2012
    • Dorr Goold S, Neblo MA, Kim SYH, et al. What is good public deliberation? 2012. Hastings Cent. Rep. 2012;42(2):24-26.
    • (2012) Hastings Cent. Rep , vol.42 , Issue.2 , pp. 24-26
    • Dorr Goold, S.1    Neblo, M.A.2    Syh, K.3
  • 17
    • 84864322520 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why and when should we use public deliberation?
    • Solomon S, Abelson J. Why and when should we use public deliberation? Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(2):17-20.
    • (2012) Hastings Cent Rep , vol.42 , Issue.2 , pp. 17-20
    • Solomon, S.1    Abelson, J.2
  • 18
    • 0030788150 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The Oregon health plan-lessons for the nation
    • Bodenheimer T. The Oregon health plan-lessons for the nation. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(9):651-656.
    • (1997) N Engl J Med , vol.337 , Issue.9 , pp. 651-656
    • Bodenheimer, T.1
  • 20
    • 78651281313 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public good, personal privacy: A citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research
    • Parkin L, Paul C. Public good, personal privacy: a citizens' deliberation about using medical information for pharmacoepidemiological research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(2):150-156.
    • (2011) J Epidemiol Community Health , vol.65 , Issue.2 , pp. 150-156
    • Parkin, L.1    Paul, C.2
  • 21
    • 84875617179 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Accessed October 31 2012
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ Community Forum. http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/index.cfm/who-is-involved-in-the- effectivehealth- care-program1/ahrq-community-forum/. Accessed October 31, 2012.
    • AHRQ Community Forum
  • 22
    • 84864322914 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The future of public deliberation on health issues
    • Abelson J, Warren M, Forest P-G. The future of public deliberation on health issues. Hastings Cent Rep. 2012;42(2):27-29.
    • (2012) Hastings Cent Rep , vol.42 , Issue.2 , pp. 27-29
    • Abelson, J.1    Warren, M.2    Forest, P.-G.3
  • 23
    • 84859864850 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda
    • The Patient-Centered Outcomes
    • Selby JV, Beal AC, Frank L. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) national priorities for research and initial research agenda. JAMA. 2012;307(15):1583-1584.
    • (2012) JAMA , vol.307 , Issue.15 , pp. 1583-1584
    • Selby, J.V.1    Beal, A.C.2    Frank, L.3
  • 24
    • 84872470441 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Accessed October 29 2012
    • Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research. http://www.pcori.org/what-we-do/pcor/. Accessed October 29, 2012.
    • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
  • 25
    • 69649089947 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Fair process and the redundancy of bioethics: A polemic
    • Ashcroft R. Fair process and the redundancy of bioethics: a polemic. Public Health Ethics. 2008;1(1):3.
    • (2008) Public Health Ethics , vol.1 , Issue.1 , pp. 3
    • Ashcroft, R.1
  • 27
    • 37849038935 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From group member to democratic citizen: How deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes
    • Gastil J, Black LW, Deess EP, Leighter J. From group member to democratic citizen: how deliberating with fellow jurors reshapes civic attitudes. Hum Commun Res. 2008;34(1):137-169.
    • (2008) Hum Commun Res , vol.34 , Issue.1 , pp. 137-169
    • Gastil, J.1    Black, L.W.2    Deess, E.P.3    Leighter, J.4
  • 29
    • 84875634920 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scan Directory.com. Accessed April 17 2012
    • Scan Directory.com. Why Get a Scan? http://www.scandirectory.com/content/ why-get-a-body-scan.asp. Accessed April 17, 2012.
    • Why Get A Scan?
  • 30
    • 84861408195 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening
    • Jacobsen KK, von Euler-Chelpin M. Performance indicators for participation in organized mammography screening. J Public Health. 2012;34(2):272-278.
    • (2012) J Public Health , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 272-278
    • Jacobsen, K.K.1    Von Euler-Chelpin, M.2
  • 31
    • 69949186007 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe
    • Gigerenzer G, Mata J, Frank R. Public knowledge of benefits of breast and prostate cancer screening in Europe. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(17):1216- 1220.
    • (2009) J Natl Cancer Inst , vol.101 , Issue.17 , pp. 1216-1220
    • Gigerenzer, G.1    Mata, J.2    Frank, R.3
  • 32
    • 0345967846 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States
    • Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Fowler FJ, Welch HG. Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States. JAMA. 2004;291(1):71-78.
    • (2004) JAMA , vol.291 , Issue.1 , pp. 71-78
    • Schwartz, L.M.1    Woloshin, S.2    Fowler, F.J.3    Welch, H.G.4
  • 33
    • 84857724590 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States
    • Wegwarth O, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Gaissmaier W, Gigerenzer G. Do physicians understand cancer screening statistics? A national survey of primary care physicians in the United States. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):340-349.
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.156 , Issue.5 , pp. 340-349
    • Wegwarth, O.1    Schwartz, L.M.2    Woloshin, S.3    Gaissmaier, W.4    Gigerenzer, G.5
  • 34
    • 0031471248 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The prostatic imperative and the social relations of medical technology
    • Willis E. The prostatic imperative and the social relations of medical technology. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997;13(4):602-612.
    • (1997) Int J Technol Assess Health Care , vol.13 , Issue.4 , pp. 602-612
    • Willis, E.1
  • 35
    • 84857507753 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Resisting the screening imperative: Patienthood, populations and politics in prostate cancer detection technologies for the UK
    • Faulkner A. Resisting the screening imperative: patienthood, populations and politics in prostate cancer detection technologies for the UK. Sociol Health Illn. 2012;34(2):221-233.
    • (2012) Sociol Health Illn , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 221-233
    • Faulkner, A.1
  • 36
    • 84857774244 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening tests
    • New York: Cambridge University Press
    • Newman TB, Kohn MA. Screening tests. Evidence-based diagnosis. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:116-137.
    • (2009) Evidence-based Diagnosis , pp. 116-137
    • Newman, T.B.1    Kohn, M.A.2
  • 37
    • 84857462763 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • UK patients are given advice on private screening
    • doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5394
    • Cole A. UK patients are given advice on private screening. BMJ. 2010;341:c5394. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5394.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.341
    • Cole, A.1
  • 38
    • 79958163807 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • New recommendations on mammography and cervical cancer screening disrupt US health reform debate
    • doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5012
    • Tanne JH. New recommendations on mammography and cervical cancer screening disrupt US health reform debate. BMJ. 2009;339:b5012. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b5012.
    • (2009) BMJ , vol.339
    • Tanne, J.H.1
  • 40
    • 79960482424 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Breast cancer screening: A 35-year perspective
    • Fletcher SW. Breast cancer screening: a 35-year perspective. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):165-175.
    • (2011) Epidemiol Rev , vol.33 , Issue.1 , pp. 165-175
    • Fletcher, S.W.1
  • 41
    • 84857479596 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The sociology of medical screening: Past, present and future
    • Armstrong N, Eborall H. The sociology of medical screening: past, present and future. Sociol Health Illn. 2012;34(2):161-176.
    • (2012) Sociol Health Illn , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 161-176
    • Armstrong, N.1    Eborall, H.2
  • 43
    • 84859357955 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: Results from the Norwegian screening program
    • Kalager M, Adami H-O, Bretthauer M, Tamimi RM. Overdiagnosis of invasive breast cancer due to mammography screening: results from the Norwegian screening program. Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(7):491-499.
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.156 , Issue.7 , pp. 491-499
    • Kalager, M.1    Adami, H.-O.2    Bretthauer, M.3    Tamimi, R.M.4
  • 44
    • 84874646183 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Endless screenings don't bring everlasting health
    • April 16
    • Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Endless screenings don't bring everlasting health. New York Times. April 16, 2012:D5.
    • (2012) New York Times
    • Schwartz, L.M.1    Woloshin, S.2
  • 45
    • 0347662336 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: Primary care physicians' use of the PSA test
    • Cooper CP, Merritt TL, Ross LE, John LV, Jorgensen CM. To screen or not to screen, when clinical guidelines disagree: primary care physicians' use of the PSA test. Prev Med. 2004;38(2):182-191.
    • (2004) Prev Med , vol.38 , Issue.2 , pp. 182-191
    • Cooper, C.P.1    Merritt, T.L.2    Ross, L.E.3    John, L.V.4    Jorgensen, C.M.5
  • 46
  • 47
    • 78049511208 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Breast cancer awareness month. Still awaiting screening facts
    • doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmj.c6152
    • Baum M, Thornton H, Gotzsche PC, et al. Breast cancer awareness month. Still awaiting screening facts. BMJ. 2010;341:c6152. doi:http://dx.doi. org/10.1136/bmj.c6152.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.341
    • Baum, M.1    Thornton, H.2    Gotzsche, P.C.3
  • 48
    • 79951629143 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Critics attack new NHS breast screening leaflet for failing to address harms
    • doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj. c7267
    • Mayor S. Critics attack new NHS breast screening leaflet for failing to address harms. BMJ. 2010;341:c7267. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj. c7267.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.341
    • Mayor, S.1
  • 49
    • 84859361181 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: Time to tackle an underappreciated harm
    • Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: time to tackle an underappreciated harm. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(7): 536-537.
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.157 , Issue.7 , pp. 536-537
    • Elmore, J.G.1    Fletcher, S.W.2
  • 50
    • 4744340737 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Adolescent and young adult women's misunderstanding of the term pap smear
    • Blake DR, Weber BM, Fletcher KE. Adolescent and young adult women's misunderstanding of the term pap smear. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(10):966-970.
    • (2004) Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med , vol.158 , Issue.10 , pp. 966-970
    • Blake, D.R.1    Weber, B.M.2    Fletcher, K.E.3
  • 51
    • 27744516946 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Poor knowledge regarding the pap test among low-income women undergoing routine screening
    • Breitkopf CR, Pearson HC, Breitkopf DM. Poor knowledge regarding the pap test among low-income women undergoing routine screening. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005;37(2):78-84.
    • (2005) Perspect Sex Reprod Health , vol.37 , Issue.2 , pp. 78-84
    • Breitkopf, C.R.1    Pearson, H.C.2    Breitkopf, D.M.3
  • 52
    • 0033631203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Informed consent for screening by community sampling
    • Irwig L, Glasziou P. Informed consent for screening by community sampling. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3(1):47-50.
    • (2000) Eff Clin Pract , vol.3 , Issue.1 , pp. 47-50
    • Irwig, L.1    Glasziou, P.2
  • 53
    • 33646827017 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening and choice- informed choice for screening: Implications for evaluation
    • Irwig L, McCaffery K, Salkeld G, Bossuyt P. Screening and choice- informed choice for screening: implications for evaluation. BMJ. 2006;332(7550):1148-1150.
    • (2006) BMJ , vol.332 , Issue.7550 , pp. 1148-1150
    • Irwig, L.1    McCaffery, K.2    Salkeld, G.3    Bossuyt, P.4
  • 54
    • 43949086861 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The ethics of information: Absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening
    • Schwartz PH, Meslin EM. The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(6):867-870.
    • (2008) J Gen Intern Med , vol.23 , Issue.6 , pp. 867-870
    • Schwartz, P.H.1    Meslin, E.M.2
  • 55
    • 34547181428 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: A qualitative study in the UK
    • Jepson RG, Hewison J, Thompson A, Weller D. Patient perspectives on information and choice in cancer screening: a qualitative study in the UK. Soc Sci Med. 2007;65(5):890-899.
    • (2007) Soc Sci Med , vol.65 , Issue.5 , pp. 890-899
    • Jepson, R.G.1    Hewison, J.2    Thompson, A.3    Weller, D.4
  • 56
    • 52649138404 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Communicating about screening
    • Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Trevena L, et al. Communicating about screening. BMJ. 2008;337(7673):3.
    • (2008) BMJ , vol.337 , Issue.7673 , pp. 3
    • Entwistle, V.A.1    Carter, S.M.2    Trevena, L.3
  • 57
    • 84856593040 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening
    • Stefanek ME. Uninformed compliance or informed choice? A needed shift in our approach to cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(24): 1821-1826.
    • (2011) J Natl Cancer Inst , vol.103 , Issue.24 , pp. 1821-1826
    • Stefanek, M.E.1
  • 58
    • 34047155525 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making
    • Krist AH, Woolf SH, Johnson RE, Kerns JW. Patient education on prostate cancer screening and involvement in decision making. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(2):112-119.
    • (2007) Ann Fam Med , vol.5 , Issue.2 , pp. 112-119
    • Krist, A.H.1    Woolf, S.H.2    Johnson, R.E.3    Kerns, J.W.4
  • 59
    • 18844430597 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The liability of giving patients a choice: Shared decision making and prostate cancer
    • Woolf SH, Krist A. The liability of giving patients a choice: shared decision making and prostate cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2005;71(10):1871-1872.
    • (2005) Am Fam Physician , vol.71 , Issue.10 , pp. 1871-1872
    • Woolf, S.H.1    Krist, A.2
  • 60
    • 22344446847 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Not all patients want to participate in decision making - A national study of public preferences
    • Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making-a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(6):531-535.
    • (2005) J Gen Intern Med , vol.20 , Issue.6 , pp. 531-535
    • Levinson, W.1    Kao, A.2    Kuby, A.3    Thisted, R.A.4
  • 65
    • 0018272361 scopus 로고
    • Epidemiology for the uninitiated: Screening
    • doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6149.1417
    • Rose G, Barker DJP. Epidemiology for the uninitiated: screening. BMJ. 1978;2:1417. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.6149.1417.
    • (1978) BMJ , vol.2 , pp. 1417
    • Rose, G.1    Barker, D.J.P.2
  • 66
    • 84863961968 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
    • Moyer VA. Screening for prostate cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2): 120-134.
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.157 , Issue.2 , pp. 120-134
    • Moyer, V.A.1
  • 67
    • 33645501981 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: 1 in 4 cancers detected by mammography are pseudocancers
    • Welch HG, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Ramifications of screening for breast cancer: 1 in 4 cancers detected by mammography are pseudocancers. BMJ. 2006;332(7543):727.
    • (2006) BMJ , vol.332 , Issue.7543 , pp. 727
    • Welch, H.G.1    Schwartz, L.M.2    Woloshin, S.3
  • 69
    • 84869083222 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: An t independent review
    • Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening
    • Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet. 2012;380(9855):1778- 1786.
    • (2012) Lancet , vol.380 , Issue.9855 , pp. 1778-1786
  • 70
    • 0029811970 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs
    • Marshall KG. Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 4. The ethics of informed consent for preventive screening programs. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;155(4):377-383.
    • (1996) Can Med Assoc J , vol.155 , Issue.4 , pp. 377-383
    • Marshall, K.G.1
  • 71
    • 78751648135 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part II: Evidence summaries
    • Silvestre MAA, Dans LF, Dans AL. Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part II: evidence summaries. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(3):240-249.
    • (2011) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.64 , Issue.3 , pp. 240-249
    • Silvestre, M.A.A.1    Dans, L.F.2    Dans, A.L.3
  • 72
    • 78751645621 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part I: General principles
    • Dans LF, Silvestre MA, Dans AL. Trade-off between benefit and harm is crucial in health screening recommendations. Part I: general principles. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(3):231-239.
    • (2011) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.64 , Issue.3 , pp. 231-239
    • Dans, L.F.1    Silvestre, M.A.2    Dans, A.L.3
  • 73
    • 34247266663 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic review: The long-term effects of false-positive mammograms
    • Brewer NT, Salz T, Lillie SE. Systematic review: the long-term effects of false-positive mammograms. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(7):502-510.
    • (2007) Ann Intern Med , vol.146 , Issue.7 , pp. 502-510
    • Brewer, N.T.1    Salz, T.2    Lillie, S.E.3
  • 74
    • 34547655642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: A prospective observational study
    • Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Bieling HB, et al. MRI for diagnosis of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: a prospective observational study. Lancet. 2007;370(9586):485-492.
    • (2007) Lancet , vol.370 , Issue.9586 , pp. 485-492
    • Kuhl, C.K.1    Schrading, S.2    Bieling, H.B.3
  • 75
    • 36549024011 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial?
    • Thorat MA. Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial? Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1902.
    • (2007) Lancet , vol.370 , Issue.9603 , pp. 1902
    • Thorat, M.A.1
  • 76
    • 36549048938 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial?
    • Thornton H. Should we undertake an MRI breast screening trial? The Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1903.
    • (2007) The Lancet , vol.370 , Issue.9603 , pp. 1903
    • Thornton, H.1
  • 78
    • 0032919541 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • "With the best of reasons": Cervical cancer prevention policy and the suppression of sexual risk factor information
    • Braun V, Gavey N. "With the best of reasons": cervical cancer prevention policy and the suppression of sexual risk factor information. Soc Sci Med. 1999;48(10):1463-1474.
    • (1999) Soc Sci Med , vol.48 , Issue.10 , pp. 1463-1474
    • Braun, V.1    Gavey, N.2
  • 79
    • 0035019336 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Information about screening-is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice?
    • Raffle AE. Information about screening-is it to achieve high uptake or to ensure informed choice? Health Expect. 2001;4(2):92-98.
    • (2001) Health Expect , vol.4 , Issue.2 , pp. 92-98
    • Raffle, A.E.1
  • 81
    • 23244435888 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regret in cancer-related decisions
    • Connolly T, Reb J. Regret in cancer-related decisions. Health Psychol. 2005;24(4):S29-S34.
    • (2005) Health Psychol , vol.24 , Issue.4
    • Connolly, T.1    Reb, J.2
  • 82
    • 0033153782 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cervical screening, compliance and moral obligation
    • Howson A. Cervical screening, compliance and moral obligation. Sociol Health Illn. 1999;21(4):401-425.
    • (1999) Sociol Health Illn , vol.21 , Issue.4 , pp. 401-425
    • Howson, A.1
  • 86
    • 84865025988 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • US Preventive Services Task Force. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05118-EF, Accessed January 18 2011
    • US Preventive Services Task Force. US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual. AHRQ Publication No. 08-05118-EF. http://www. uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf08/methods/procmanual.htm. Accessed January 18, 2011.
    • US Preventive Services Task Force Procedure Manual
  • 87
    • 79960476408 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Overview of screening: Where we are and where we may be headed
    • Harris R. Overview of screening: where we are and where we may be headed. Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33(1):1-6.
    • (2011) Epidemiol Rev , vol.33 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-6
    • Harris, R.1
  • 88
    • 84875631626 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Accessed May 25
    • Currow D, Armstrong B. PSA Needs Order. http://www.mjainsight.com. au/view?post=david-currow-bruce-armstrong-psa-needs-order&post-id= 6489&cat=comment. Accessed May 25, 2012.
    • PSA Needs Order , vol.2012
    • Currow, D.1    Armstrong, B.2
  • 89
    • 72049100691 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement
    • US Preventive Services Task Force
    • US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):716.
    • (2009) Ann Intern Med , vol.151 , Issue.10 , pp. 716
  • 91
    • 81855227059 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prostate-cancer screening-what the US Preventive Services Task Force left out
    • doi: 10.056/NEJMp1112191
    • Brett AS, Ablin RJ. Prostate-cancer screening-what the US Preventive Services Task Force left out. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1949-1951 doi: 10.056/NEJMp1112191.
    • (2011) N Engl J Med , vol.365 , pp. 1949-1951
    • Brett, A.S.1    Ablin, R.J.2
  • 92
    • 84863887100 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What the US Preventive Services Task Force missed in its prostate cancer screening recommendation
    • Catalona WJ, D'Amico AV, Fitzgibbons WF, et al. What the US Preventive Services Task Force missed in its prostate cancer screening recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):137-138.
    • (2012) Ann Intern Med , vol.157 , Issue.2 , pp. 137-138
    • Catalona, W.J.1    D'amico, A.V.2    Fitzgibbons, W.F.3
  • 93
    • 85007664269 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The PSA storm: Questioning cancer screening can be a risky business in America
    • Yamey G, Wilkes M. The PSA storm: questioning cancer screening can be a risky business in America. BMJ. 2002;324(7334):431.
    • (2002) BMJ , vol.324 , Issue.7334 , pp. 431
    • Yamey, G.1    Wilkes, M.2
  • 94
    • 77955611696 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The great prostate mistake
    • March 10
    • Ablin RJ. The great prostate mistake. New York Times. March 10, 2010:A27.
    • (2010) New York Times , vol.A27
    • Ablin, R.J.1
  • 95
    • 70350596110 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening for prostate cancer: Controversy? What controversy?
    • Ablin RJ, Haythorn MR. Screening for prostate cancer: controversy? What controversy? Curr Oncol. 2009;16(3):1-2.
    • (2009) Curr Oncol , vol.16 , Issue.3 , pp. 1-2
    • Ablin, R.J.1    Haythorn, M.R.2
  • 96
    • 81855206806 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening for prostate cancer: A review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force
    • Chou R, Croswell JM, Dana T, et al. Screening for prostate cancer: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(11):762-771.
    • (2011) Ann Intern Med , vol.155 , Issue.11 , pp. 762-771
    • Chou, R.1    Croswell, J.M.2    Dana, T.3
  • 97
    • 84858212484 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 Years of follow-up
    • Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, et al. Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 Years of follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):981-990.
    • (2012) N Engl J Med , vol.366 , Issue.11 , pp. 981-990
    • Schröder, F.H.1    Hugosson, J.2    Roobol, M.J.3
  • 98
    • 81855218123 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Stratifying risk - The US Preventive Services Task Force and prostate-cancer screening
    • Schröder FH. Stratifying risk-the US Preventive Services Task Force and prostate-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1953-1955.
    • (2011) N Engl J Med , vol.365 , pp. 1953-1955
    • Schröder, F.H.1
  • 99
    • 81855212606 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • One man at a time-resolving the PSA controversy
    • doi: 10.056/NEJMp11112140
    • McNaughton-Collins MF, Barry MJ. One man at a time-resolving the PSA controversy. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1951-1953 doi: 10.056/NEJMp11112140.
    • (2011) N Engl J Med , vol.365 , pp. 1951-1953
    • McNaughton-Collins, M.F.1    Barry, M.J.2
  • 100
    • 77954612931 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Screening for breast cancer: Balancing the debate
    • doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3106
    • McPherson K. Screening for breast cancer: balancing the debate. BMJ. 2010;340:c3106. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c3106.
    • (2010) BMJ , vol.340
    • McPherson, K.1
  • 101
    • 76149102565 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revealing Oz behind the curtain: USPSTF screening mammography guidelines and the hot air balloon
    • Javitt MC, Hendrick RE. Revealing Oz behind the curtain: USPSTF screening mammography guidelines and the hot air balloon. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):289-290.
    • (2010) Am J Roentgenol , vol.194 , Issue.2 , pp. 289-290
    • Javitt, M.C.1    Hendrick, R.E.2
  • 102
    • 84875594983 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Breast screening should be scrapped. Evidence points to the fact that cancer mortality rates are dropping due to improved treatment, not mammograms
    • Accessed January 8 2013 August 2
    • Baum M. Breast screening should be scrapped. Evidence points to the fact that cancer mortality rates are dropping due to improved treatment, not mammograms. The Guardian. August 2, 2011. http://www.guardian.co.uk/ commentisfree/2011/aug/02/breast-cancer-screening. Accessed January 8, 2013.
    • (2011) The Guardian
    • Baum, M.1
  • 103
    • 81555216021 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effect of population based screening on breast cancer mortality
    • Bock K, Borisch B, Cawson J, et al. Effect of population based screening on breast cancer mortality. Lancet. 2011;378(9805):1775-1776
    • (2011) Lancet , vol.378 , Issue.9805 , pp. 1775-1776
    • Bock, K.1    Borisch, B.2    Cawson, J.3
  • 104
    • 84857827076 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opposing views: Do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: Yes
    • Roder DM, Olver IN. Opposing views: do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: yes. Med J Aust. 2012;196(1):16.
    • (2012) Med J Aust , vol.196 , Issue.1 , pp. 16
    • Roder, D.M.1    Olver, I.N.2
  • 105
    • 84857884638 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opposing views: Do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: No
    • Bell RJ, Burton RC. Opposing views: do the benefits of screening mammography outweigh the harms: no. Med J Aust. 2012;169(1):17.
    • (2012) Med J Aust , vol.169 , Issue.1 , pp. 17
    • Bell, R.J.1    Burton, R.C.2
  • 106
    • 0017771912 scopus 로고
    • Breast cancer screening: A view from outside the controversy
    • Thier SO. Breast cancer screening: a view from outside the controversy. N Engl J Med. 1977;275(19):1063-1065.
    • (1977) N Engl J Med , vol.275 , Issue.19 , pp. 1063-1065
    • Thier, S.O.1
  • 107
    • 84875595984 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Get a mammogram. No don't. Repeat
    • November 21
    • Kolata G. Get a mammogram. No don't. Repeat. New York Times. November 21, 2009:WK4.
    • (2009) New York Times , vol.WK4
    • Kolata, G.1
  • 108
    • 0033178111 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: Surveying the riskassessment battlefield
    • Slovic P. Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the riskassessment battlefield. Risk Anal. 1999;19(4):689-701.
    • (1999) Risk Anal , vol.19 , Issue.4 , pp. 689-701
    • Slovic, P.1
  • 109
    • 79953758311 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Getting evidence into policy: The need for deliberative strategies?
    • Flitcroft K, Gillespie J, Salkeld G, Carter S, Trevena L. Getting evidence into policy: the need for deliberative strategies? Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(7):1039-1046.
    • (2011) Soc Sci Med , vol.72 , Issue.7 , pp. 1039-1046
    • Flitcroft, K.1    Gillespie, J.2    Salkeld, G.3    Carter, S.4    Trevena, L.5


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.