Optimal error of query sets under the differentially-private matrix mechanism

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 272-283

  Li, Chao ^a   Miklau, Gerome ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Differential privacy; Linear query; Lower bound; Matrix mechanism; Spectral decomposition

Indexed keywords

CORRELATED NOISE; DIFFERENTIAL PRIVACIES; LINEAR QUERY; LOWER BOUNDS; REASONABLE ACCURACY; SPECTRAL DECOMPOSITION; SPECTRAL PROPERTIES; SYNTHETIC DATASETS;

DATA PRIVACY; MATRIX ALGEBRA;

QUERY PROCESSING;

EID: 84875580068     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2448496.2448529     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. B. Barak, K. Chaudhuri, C. Dwork, S. Kale, F. McSherry, and K. Talwar. Privacy, accuracy, and consistency too: A holistic solution to contingency table release. In PODS, 2007.
2. A. Ben-Israel and T. Greville. Generalized inverses: Theory and applications, volume 15. Springer, 2003.
3. A. Bhaskara, D. Dadush, R. Krishnaswamy, and K. Talwar. Unconditional di-erentially private mechanisms for linear queries. In STOC, pages 1269{1284, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
4. A. Blum, K. Ligett, and A. Roth. A learning theory approach to non-interactive database privacy. In STOC, pages 609{618, 2008.
5. G. Cormode, M. Procopiuc, E. Shen, D. Srivastava, and T. Yu. Differentially private spatial decompositions. ICDE, pages 20{31, 2012.
6. B. Ding, M. Winslett, J. Han, and Z. Li. Differentially private data cubes: optimizing noise sources and consistency. In SIGMOD, pages 217{228, 2011.
7. I. Dinur and K. Nissim. Revealing information while preserving privacy. In PODS, pages 202{210, 2003.
8. C. Dwork, K. Kenthapadi, F. McSherry, I. Mironov, and M. Naor. Our data, ourselves: Privacy via distributed noise generation. In EUROCRYPT, pages 486{503, 2006.
9. C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In TCC, pages 265{284, 2006.
10. C. Dwork, M. Naor, O. Reingold, G. Rothblum, and S. Vadhan. On the complexity of di-erentially private data release: e-cient algorithms and hardness results. In STOC, pages 381{390, 2009.
11. C. Dwork, G. N. Rothblum, and S. P. Vadhan. Boosting and di-erential privacy. In FOCS, pages 51{60, 2010.
12. A. Gupta, A. Roth, and J. Ullman. Iterative constructions and private data release. In TCC, pages 339{356, 2012.
13. M. Hardt, K. Ligett, and F. McSherry. A simple and practical algorithm for differentially private data release. In NIPS, pages 2348{2356, 2012.
14. M. Hardt and G. Rothblum. A multiplicative weights mechanism for privacy-preserving data analysis. In FOCS, pages 61{70, 2010.
15. M. Hardt and K. Talwar. On the geometry of di-erential privacy. In STOC, pages 705{714, 2010.
16. M. Hay, V. Rastogi, G. Miklau, and D. Suciu. Boosting the accuracy of di-erentially-private histograms through consistency. PVLDB, 3(1-2):1021{1032, 2010.
17. S. Kasiviswanathan, M. Rudelson, A. Smith, and J. Ullman. The price of privately releasing contingency tables and the spectra of random matrices with correlated rows. In STOC, pages 775{784, 2010.
18. C. Li, M. Hay, V. Rastogi, G. Miklau, and A. McGregor. Optimizing linear counting queries under di-erential privacy. In PODS, pages 123{134, 2010.
19. C. Li and G. Miklau. An adaptive mechanism for accurate query answering under differential privacy. PVLDB, 5(6):514{525, 2012.
20. C. Li and G. Miklau. Optimal error of query sets under the differentially-private matrix mechanism. CoRR, abs/1202.3399, 2012.
21. Y. D. Li, Z. Zhang, M. Winslett, and Y. Yang. Compressive mechanism: utilizing sparse representation in di-erential privacy. In WPES, pages 177{182, 2011.
22. F. McSherry and I. Mironov. Differentially Private Recommender Systems : Building Privacy into the Netix Prize Contenders. In SIGKDD, pages 627{636, 2009.
23. A. Nikolov, K. Talwar, and L. Zhang. The geometry of di-erential privacy: the sparse and approximate cases. CoRR, arXiv/1212.0297, 2012.
24. K. Nissim, S. Raskhodnikova, and A. Smith. Smooth sensitivity and sampling in private data analysis. In STOC, pages 75{84, 2007.
25. V. Rastogi, D. Suciu, and S. Hong. The boundary between privacy and utility in data publishing. In VLDB, number 531-542, 2007.
26. A. Roth and T. Roughgarden. Interactive privacy via the median mechanism. In STOC, pages 765{774, 2010.
27. X. Xiao, G. Wang, and J. Gehrke. Differential privacy via wavelet transforms. In ICDE, pages 225{236, 2010.
28. Y. Xiao, L. Xiong, and C. Yuan. Differentially private data release through multidimensional partitioning. In SDM, pages 150{168, 2010.
29. G. Yaroslavtsev, G. Cormode, C. M. Procopiuc, and D. Srivastava. Accurate and e-cient private release of datacubes and contingency tables. In ICDE, 2013.
30. G. Yuan, Z. Zhang, M. Winslett, X. Xiao, Y. Yang, and Z. Hao. Low-rank mechanism: Optimizing batch queries under di-erential privacy. PVLDB, 5(11):1136{1147, 2012.