Mexican voter network as a dynamic complex system

50th Annual Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences 2006, ISSS 2006

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 754-764

  Morales Matamoros, Oswaldo ^a,b   Martínez Cruz, Miguel A ^a,b   Tejeida Padilla, Ricardo ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

^b Research Group Fractal Mechanics   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Complex systems; Complexity; Fractal analysis; Voting network

Indexed keywords

COMPLEXITY; DYNAMIC COMPLEX SYSTEM; FRACTAL ANALYSIS; HIERARCHICAL ARCHITECTURES; MODELING AND FORECASTING; PARETO DISTRIBUTIONS; SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINE; STABLE DISTRIBUTIONS;

FRACTAL DIMENSION; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS;

COMPLEX NETWORKS;

EID: 84875579266     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Adams, J. and Merrill, S. (1999). Modeling Party Strategies and Policy Representation in Multiparty Elections: Why Are Strategies So Extreme? American Journal of Political Science, V. 43, : 765-791.
2. Alves, S. et al (2002).Electoral Surveys on the Voting Processes: a cellular automata model, arXiv:cond-mat/0204139.
3. Bak, P. (1996).How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organised Criticality. Copernicus Press, New York.
4. Balankin, A. (2003). Fractal Behavior of Complex Systems, Científica, V. 7, No. 3:109-128.
5. Balankin, A. (2004).et al Crossover from antipersistent to persistent behaviour in time series possessing the generalized dynamic scaling law, Review, Ser. E, V. 69, No. 3.
6. Costa Filho, R et al (2003).Brazilian elections: voting for a scaling democracy, Physica A, V. 322, :698-700 .
7. Costa Filho, R. et al (1999). Scaling behavior in a proportional voting process, Physical Review, Ser. E, V. 60, No. 1:1067-1068 .
8. Cowan, G. et al (1994). Complexity, Metaphors, Models and Reality,. Addison-Wesley, Santa Fe.
9. Dorogovtsev, S. N. and Mendes, J. F. F. (2003). Evolution of networks: From biological nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Galam, S. (2000). Application of Statistical Physics to Plitics, arXiv:cond-mat/0004306.
11. Gonzalez, M. et al (2003).Opinion Formation on a Deterministic Pseudo-fractal Network, arXiv:cond-mat/0307537.
12. IFE (2005) http://www.ife.org.mx
13. López, J. M. (2002).Dinámica de la opinión pública en redes sociales de influencia, Revista Española de Física, V. 16, No. 5, : 59-62
14. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). Handbook of Graphs and Networks: from the Genome to the Internet, edited by S. Bornholdt and H. G. Schuster Wiley-VCH, Berlin
15. Schofield, N. and Parks, R. (2000).Nash Equilibrium in a Spatial Model of Coalition Bargaining, Mathematical Social Sciences, V. 39,:133-174.
16. Shlesinger, M et al (1995).Lévy Flights and Related Topics in Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
17. Situngkir, H. (2004).The Power-law Signature in Indonesian Legislative Election. Preprint: arxiv: nlin.AO/0405002.
18. Stauffer, D. (2003).Sosiophysics Simulations, Computing In Science & Engineering, No. 3 : 71-75.
19. Wasserman, S. and Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
20. Weidlich, W. (2000). Sociodynamics: A Systematic Approach to Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences. Harwood Academic Publishers
21. Weidlich, W. (2002). Modeling Complexity in Economic and Social Systems, ed. F. Schweitzer World Scientific Singapore.