Breeding systems, hybridization and continuing evolution in Avon Gorge Sorbus

Annals of Botany

Volumn 111, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 563-575

  Ludwig, Shanna ^a   Robertson, Ashley ^a   Rich, Timothy C G ^b   Djordjević, Milena ^c   Cerović, Radosav ^c   Houston, Libby ^a   Harris, Stephen A ^d   Hiscock, Simon J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^c FRUIT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Serbia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

apomixis; evolution; Hybridization; polyploidy; pseudogamy; self incompatibility; Sorbus

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; BREEDING; EVOLUTION; GENOTYPE; GROWTH RATE; MATING BEHAVIOR; OUTCROSSING; PERSISTENCE; PLANT COMMUNITY; POLYPLOIDY;

ARTICLE; DIPLOIDY; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; PLANT SEED; POLLEN TUBE; POLLINATION; POLYPLOIDY; SELF FERTILIZATION; SORBUS; UNITED KINGDOM;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DIPLOIDY; GREAT BRITAIN; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; POLLEN TUBE; POLLINATION; POLYPLOIDY; SEEDS; SELF-FERTILIZATION; SORBUS;

BRISTOL [BRISTOL (ADS)]; BRISTOL [ENGLAND]; ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

ROSACEAE; SORBUS;

EID: 84875577495     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct013     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Abbott RJ, Lowe AJ. 1996. A review of hybridization and evolution in British Senecio. In: Hind DJN, Beentje HJ. eds. Compositae, systematics. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, 679-689.
2. Abbott RJ, Lowe AJ. 2004. Origins, establishment and evolution of new polyploid species: Senecio cambrensis and S. eboracensis in the British Isles. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 467-474.
3. Abbott RJ, Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ, Brennan AC. 2010. Homoploid hybrid speciation in action. Taxon 59: 1375-1386.
4. Ainouche ML, Baumel A, Salmon A, Yannic G. 2003. Hybridization, polyploidy and speciation in Spartina (Poaceae). New Phytologist 161: 165-172.
5. Allen AM, Lexer C, Hiscock SJ. 2010. Comparative analysis of pistil transcriptomes reveals conserved and novel genes expressed in dry, wet, and semi-dry stigmas. Plant Physiology 154: 1347-1360.
6. Arnold ML. 1997. Natural hybridization and evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. Ashton PA, Abbott RJ. 1992. Multiple origins and genetic diversity in the newly arisen allopolyploidy species, Senecio cambrensis Rosser (Compositae). Heredity 68: 25-32.
8. Asker S. 1978. Pseudogamy, hybridization and evolution in Potentilla. Hereditas 87: 179-184.
9. Bailey JP, Kay QON, McAllister H, Rich TCG. 2008. Chromosome numbers in Sorbus L. (Rosaceae) in the British Isles. Watsonia 27: 69-72.
10. Briggs D, Walters SM. 1997. Plant variation and evolution, 3rd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bushell C, Spielman M, Scott RJ. 2003. The basis of natural and artificial postzygotic hybridization barriers in Arabidopsis species. The Plant Cell 15: 1430-1442.
12. Chawla B, Bernatzky R, Liang W, Marcotrigiano M. 1997. Breakdown of self-incompatibility in tetraploid Lycopersicon peruvianum: inheritance and expression of S-related proteins. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 992-996.
13. Chester M, Cowan RS, Fay MF, Rich TCG. 2007. Parentage of endemic Sorbus L. (Rosaceae) species in the British Isles-evidence from plastid DNA. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 154: 291-304.
14. Coyne JA, Orr HA. 2004. Speciation. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
15. Dickinson TA, Lo E, Talent N. 2007. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Plant Systematics and Evolution 266: 59-78.
16. Dickinson TA, Phipps JB. 1986. Studies in Crataegus (Rosaceae: Maloideae) XIV. The breeding system of Crataegus crus-galli sensu lato in Ontario. American Journal of Botany 73: 116-130.
17. Doyle JJ, Flagel LE, Paterson AH, et al. 2008. Evolutionary genetics of genome merger and doubling in plants. Annual Review of Genetics 42: 443-461.
18. Ellstrand NC, Roose ML. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. American Journal of Botany 74: 123-131.
19. Golz JF, Clarke AE, Newbigin E. 2000. Mutational approaches to the study of self-incompatibility: revisiting the pollen-part mutants. Annals of Botany 85: 95-103.
20. Golz JF, Oh H-Y, Su V, Kusaba M, Newbigin E. 2001. Genetic analysis of Nicotiana pollen-part mutants is consistent with the presence of an S-ribonuclease inhibitor at the S-locus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 98: 15372-15376.
21. Grant V. 1981. Plant speciation, 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
22. Haig D, Westoby M. 1991. Genomic imprinting in endosperm: its effect on seed development in crosses between species, and between different ploidies of the same species, and its implications for the evolution of apomixis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 333: 1-13.
23. Haskell G. 1960. Role of the male parent in crosses involving apomictic Rubus species. Heredity 14: 101-113.
24. Hauck NR, Yamane H, Tao R, Iezzoni AF. 2002. Self-compatibility and incompatibility in tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.) Sexual Plant Reproduction 15: 39-46.
25. Hauck NR, Yamane H, Tao R, Iezzone AF. 2006. Accumulation of nonfunctional S-haplotypes results in the breakdown of gametophytic selfincompatibility in tetraploid Prunus. Genetics 172: 1191-1198.
26. Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. 2005. Hybrid speciation in plants: new insights from molecular studies. New Phytologist 165: 411-423.
27. Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ. 2008. Genomic clues to the evolutionary success of polyploidy plants. Current Biology 18: R435-R444.
28. Hiscock SJ, McInnis SM. 2003. The diversity of self-incompatibility systems in flowering plants. Plant Biology 5: 23-32.
29. Hoebee SE, Arnold U, Duggelin C, et al 2007. Mating patterns and contemporary gene flow by pollen in a large continuous and a small isolated population of the scattered forest tree Sorbus torminalis. Heredity 99: 47-55.
30. Horandl E. 2006. The complex causality of geographical parthenogenesis. New Phytologist 171: 525-538.
31. Horandl E. 2010. The evolution of self-fertility in apomictic plants. Sexual Plant Reproduction 23: 73-86.
32. Horandl E, Paun O. 2007. Patterns and sources of genetic diversity in apomictic plants: implications for evolutionary potentials and ecology. In: Ho randl E, Grossniklaus U, Van Dijk PJ, Sharbel T. eds. Apomixis: evolution, mechanisms and perspectives. Ruggell, Liechtenstein: ARG-Gantner, 169-154.
33. Jankun A, Kovanda M. 1987. Apomixis and origin of Sorbus bohemica (Embryological studies in Sorbus no. 2). Preslia 59: 97-116.
34. Kamm U, Rotach P, Gugerli F, Siroky M, Edwards P, Holderegger R. 2009. Frequent long-distance gene flow in a rare temperate forest tree (Sorbus domestica) at the landscape scale. Heredity 103: 476-482.
35. Kho YO, Baer J. 1971. Fluorescence microscopy in botanical research. Zeiss Information 76: 54-57.
36. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2008. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320: 481-483.
37. Lemche EB. 1999. The origins and interactions of British Sorbus species. PhD thesis, Darwin College, Cambridge, UK.
38. Levin DA. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35-43.
39. Liljefors A. 1954. Studies on propagation, embryology and pollination in Sorbus. Acta Horti Bergiani 16: 277-329.
40. Lin BY. 1984. Ploidy barrier to endosperm development in maize. Genetics 107: 103-115.
41. Lush WM, Clarke AE. 1997. Observations of pollen tube growth in Nicotiana alata and their implications for the mechanism of selfincompatibility. Sexual Plant Reproduction 10: 27-35.
42. Luu DT, Qin X, Morse D, Cappadocia M. 2000. S-RNase uptake by compatible pollen tubes in gametophytic self-incompatibility. Nature 407: 649-651.
43. Mable BK. 2004. Polyploidy and self-compatibility: is there an association? New Phytologist 162: 803-811.
44. McClure BA, Cruz-Garcia F, Romero C. 2011. Compatibility and incompatibility in S-RNase-based systems. Annals of Botany 108: 647-658.
45. Meng X, Sun P, Kao T-H. 2011. S-RNase-based self-incompatibility in Petunia inflata. Annals of Botany 108: 637-646.
46. Nelson-Jones EB, Briggs D, Smith AG. 2002. The origin of intermediate species of the genus Sorbus. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 105: 953-963.
47. de Nettancourt D. 1977. Incompatibility in angiosperms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
48. Nogler GA. 1984. Gametophytic apomixis. In: Johri BM. ed. Embryology of angiosperms. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 475-518.
49. Noirot M, Couvet D, Hamon S. 1997. Main role of self-pollination rate on reproductive allocations in pseudogamous apomicts. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95: 479-483.
50. Nylehn J, Hamre E, Nordal I. 2003. Facultative apomixis and hybridization in arctic Potentilla section Niveae (Rosaceae) from Svalbard. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142: 373-381.
51. Oddou-Muratorio S, Klein EK, Demesure-Musch B, Austerlitz F. 2006. Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wild-service tree, Sorbus torminalis (Rosaceae). III. Mating patterns and the ecological maternal neighborhood. American Journal of Botany 93: 1650-1659.
52. Pellicer J, Clermont S, Houston L, Rich TCG, Fay MF. 2012. Cytotype diversity in the Sorbus complex (Rosaceae) in Britain: sorting out the puzzle. Annals of Botany 110: 1185-1193.
53. Pias B, Guitian P. 2006. Breeding systems and pollen limitation in the masting tree Sorbus aucuparia L. (Rosaceae) in the NW Iberian Peninsula. Acta Oecologica 29: 97-103.
54. Preil W. 1970. Observing the growth of pollen tubes in pistil and ovarian tissue by means of fluorescence microscopy. Zeiss Information 75: 24-25.
55. Proctor MCF, Groenhof AC. 1992. Peroxidase isozyme and morphological variation in Sorbus L. in South Wales and adjacent areas, with particular reference to S. porrigentiformis E.F. Warb. Watsonia 19: 21-37.
56. Rasmussen KK, Kollmann J. 2004. Poor sexual reproduction on the distribution limit of the rare tree Sorbus torminalis. Acta Oecologica 25: 211-218.
57. RaspeO, Findlay C, Jacqueman AL. 2000. Sorbus aucuparia L. Journal of Ecology 88: 910-930.
58. Rich TCG. 2009. Pollen stainability in British Sorbus L. (Rosaceae). Plant Ecology & Diversity 2: 85-88.
59. Rich TCG, Harris SA, Hiscock SJ. 2009. Five new Sorbus (Rosaceae) taxa from the Avon Gorge, England. Watsonia 27: 217-228.
60. Rich TCG, Houston L, Robertson A, Proctor MCF. 2010. Whitebeams, rowans and service trees of Britain and Ireland. A monograph of British and Irish Sorbus L. B.S.B.I. Handbook No. 14. London: Botanical Society of the British Isles.
61. Rieseberg LH. 1997. Hybrid origins of plant species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 359-389.
62. Rieseberg LH, Willis JH. 2007. Plant speciation. Science 317: 910-914.
63. Robertson A, Newton AC, Ennos RA. 2004a. Multiple hybrid origins, genetic diversity and population genetic structure of two endemic Sorbus taxa on the Isle of Arran, Scotland. Molecular Ecology 13: 123-143.
64. Robertson A, Newton AC, Ennos RA. 2004b. Breeding systems and continuing evolution in the endemic Sorbus taxa on Arran. Heredity 93: 487-495.
65. Robertson A, Rich TCG, Allen AM, et al 2010. Hybridization and polyploidy as drivers of continuing evolution and speciation in Sorbus. Molecular Ecology 19: 1675-1690.
66. Scott RJ, Spielman M, Bailey J, Dickinson HG. 1998. Parent-of-origin effects on seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 125: 3329-3341.
67. Simpson CE, Bashaw EC. 1969. Cytology and reproductive characteristics in Pennisetum setaceum. American Journal of Botany 56: 31-36.
68. Smith GL. 1963a. Studies in Potentilla L. I. Embryological investigations into the mechanism of agamospermy in British P. tabernaemontani Aschers. New Phytologist 62: 264-282.
69. Smith GL. 1963b. Studies in Potentilla L. II. Cytological aspects of apomixis in P. crantzii (Cr.) Beck ex Fritsch. New Phytologist 62: 283-300.
70. Soltis DE, Soltis PS. 2002. Soltis Lab CTAB DNA extraction protocol. http://www.flmnh.ufl.edu/soltislab/Soltis-site/Protocols.html [accessed 26 April 2012].
71. Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Pires JC, Kovarik A, Tate JA, Mavrodiev E. 2004. Recent and recurrent polyploidy in Tragopogon (Asteraceae): cytogenetic, genomic and genetic comparisons. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 485-501.
72. Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2009. The role of hybridization in plant speciation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 60: 561-588.
73. Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. New York: Columbia University Press.
74. Stewart-Cox JA, Britton NF, Mogie M. 2005. Space mediates coexistence of females and hermaphrodites. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 67: 1273-1302.
75. Talent N, Dickinson TA. 2007. Endosperm formation in aposporous Crataegus (Rosaceae, Spiraeoideae, tribe Pyreae): parallels to Ranunculaceae and Poaceae. New Phytologist 173: 231-249.
76. Urbanska KM, Hurka H, Landolt E, Neuffer B, Mummenhoff K. 1997. Hybridization and evolution in Cardamine (Brassicaceae) at Urnerboden, central Switzerland: Biosystematic and molecular evidence. Plant Systematics and Evolution 204: 233-256.
77. Whitton J, Sears CJ, Baack EJ, Otto SP. 2008. The dynamic nature of apomixis in the angiosperms. International Journal of Plant Sciences 169: 169-182.