Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 368, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 1189-1198

  Diegeler, Anno ^a   Börgermann, Jochen ^b   Kappert, Utz ^c   Breuer, Martin ^d   Böning, Andreas ^e   Ursulescu, Adrian ^f   Rastan, Ardawan ^g   Holzhey, David ^g   Treede, Hendrik ^h   Rieß, Friedrich Christian ⁱ   Veeckmann, Philippe ^j   Asfoor, Amjad ^k   Reents, Wilko ^a   Zacher, Michael ^a   Hilker, Michael ^l  

^a Cardiovascular Clinic Bad Neustadt   (Germany)

^b RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^c University Heart Center Dresden   (Germany)

^d Abteilung Palliativmedizin   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GIESSEN   (Germany)

^f ROBERT BOSCH HOSPITAL   (Germany)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^h UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

ⁱ ALBERTINEN KRANKENHAUS   (Germany)

^j Department of Cardiovascular Surgery   (Germany)

^k RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^l UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE KIDNEY FAILURE; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; ELECTIVE SURGERY; FEMALE; GERIATRIC PATIENT; HEART INFARCTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; ON PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SURGICAL MORTALITY; TRANSFUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875542981     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1211666     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Pintar T, Collard CD. The systemic inflammatory response to cardiopulmonary bypass. Anesthesiol Clin North America 2003;21:453-64. (Pubitemid 37169539)
2. Selnes OA, Gottesman RF, Grega MA, Baumgartner WA, Zeger SL, McKhann GM. Cognitive and neurologic outcomes after coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2012;366:250-7.
3. Diegeler A, Doll N, Rauch T, et al. Humoral immune response during coronary bypass grafting: a comparison of limited approach, "off-pump" technique, and conventional cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 2000;102:Suppl 3:III-95-III-100.
4. Diegeler A, Hirsch R, Schneider F, et al. Neuromonitoring and neurocognitive outcome in off-pump versus conventional bypass operation. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1162-6. (Pubitemid 30259379)
5. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2003;348:394-402. (Pubitemid 36159356)
6. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, et al. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery: angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Circulation 2004;110:3418-23. (Pubitemid 39610503)
7. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, et al. Off-pump vs. conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004;291:1841-9. (Pubitemid 38509496)
8. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004;350:21-8. (Pubitemid 38032180)
9. Hannan EL, Wu C, Smith CR, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation 2007;116:1145-52. (Pubitemid 47364672)
10. Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Circulation 2012;125:2827-35.
11. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2009;361:1827-37.
12. Lamy A, Devereaux PJ, Prabhakaran D, et al. Off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting at 30 days. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1489-97.
13. Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SAM. The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 2003;24:881-2.
14. Badreldin AMA, Kania A, Ismail MMA, et al. KCH, the German preoperative score for isolated coronary artery by-pass surgery: is it superior to the logistic EuroSCORE? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;59:399-405.
15. Puskas J, Cheng D, Knight J, et al. Off-pump versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis and consensus statement from the 2004 ISMICS Consensus Conference. Innovations 2005;1:3-27.
16. Kuss O, Börgermann J. Do higher-risk patients benefit from off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting? Evidence from an ecologic analysis of randomized trials. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;142(3):e117-e122.
17. Møller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, et al. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: the Best Bypass Surgery Trial. Circulation 2010;121:498-504.
18. Sellke FW, DiMaio JM, Caplan LR, et al. Comparing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: numerous studies but few conclusions: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia in collaboration with the Interdisciplinary Working Group on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Circulation 2005;111:2858-64. (Pubitemid 40791559)
19. Houlind K, Kjeldsen BJ, Madsen SN, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in elderly patients: results from the Danish on-pump versus off-pump randomization study. Circulation 2012;125:2431-9.