Conservation priorities of useful plants from different techniques of collection and analysis of ethnobotanical data

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 169-186

  de Lucena, Reinaldo Farias Paiva ^a   Lucena, Camilla M ^a   Araújo, Elcida L ^b   Alves, Ângelo G C ^b   de Albuquerque, Ulysses P ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARAÍBA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL RURAL DE PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Caatinga; Inventory in situ; Priority index of conservation; Use value

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; CLASSIFICATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ETHNOBOTANY; HUMAN; PLANT; RURAL POPULATION;

BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ETHNOBOTANY; HUMANS; PLANTS; RURAL POPULATION;

EID: 84875515799     PISSN: 00013765     EISSN: 16782690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0001-37652013005000013     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ALBUQUERQUE UP AND ANDRADE LHC. 2002a. Conhecimento botânico tradicional e conservação em uma área de Caatinga no Estado de Pernambuco, Nordeste do Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 16: 273-285.
2. ALBUQUERQUE UP AND ANDRADE LHC. 2002b. Uso de recursos vegetais da Caatinga: o caso do agreste do estado de Pernambuco (Nordeste do Brasil). Interciencia 27: 336-345.
3. ALBUQUERQUE UP, ANDRADE LHC AND SILVA ACO. 2005. Use of plant resources in a seasonal dry forest (Northeastern Brazil). Acta Bot Bras 19(1): 27-38.
4. ALBUQUERQUE UP, ARAUJO TAS, RAMOS MA, NASCIMENTO VT, LUCENA RFP, MONTEIRO JM, ALENCAR N AND ARAÚJO EL. 2009. How ethnobotany can aid biodiversity conservation reflections on investigations in the semi-arid region of NE Brazil. Biodivers Conserv 18: 127-150.
5. ALBUQUERQUE UP AND LUCENA RFP. 2005. Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia 30: 506-511.
6. ALBUQUERQUE UP, LUCENA RFP AND ALENCAR NL. 2010b. Métodos e técnicas para a coleta de dados etnobiológicos. In: ALBUQUERQUE UP, LUCENA RFP AND CUNHA LVFC (Eds), Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobiológica e etnoecológica. NUPEEA, Recife, p. 38-64.
7. ALBUQUERQUE UP, LUCENA RFP AND LINS NETO EMF. 2010a. Seleção dos participantes da pesquisa. In: ALBUQUERQUE UP, LUCENA RFP AND CUNHA LVFC (Eds), Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobiológica e etnoecológica. NUPEEA, Recife, p. 23-37.
8. ALBUQUERQUE UP, LUCENA RFP, MONTEIRO JM, FLORENTINO ATN AND ALMEIDA CFCBR. 2006. Evaluating two quantitative ethnobotanical techniques. Ethn Res & Appl 4: 51-60.
9. ALBUQUERQUE UP AND OLIVEIRA RF. 2007. Is the use-impact on native caatinga species in Brazil reduced by the high species richness of medicinal plants? J Ethnopharmacol 113: 156-170.
10. ARAÚJO EL AND FERRAZ EMN. 2010. Análise da vegetação nos estudos etnobotânicos. In: Albuquerque UP et al. (Eds), Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobiológica e etnoecológica. NUPEEA, Recife, p. 223-253.
11. ARAÚJO HFP, LUCENA RFP AND MOURÃO JS. 2005. Prenúncio de chuvas pelas aves na percepção de moradores de comunidades rurais no município de Soledade-PB, Brasil. Interciencia 30: 764-769.
12. ATLAS GEOGRÁFICO DO ESTADO DA PARAÍBA. 1985.
13. AYRES M, AYRES JRM, AYRES DL AND SANTOS AS. 2003. BioEstat 3.0. Aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém, Pará.
14. BREWER DD. 2002. Complementary interviewing techniques to maximize output in free listing tasks. Field Meth 14: 108-118.
15. DALLE SP AND POTVIN C. 2004. Conservation of useful plants: an evaluation of local priorities from two indigenous communities in eastern Panama. Econ Bot 58: 38-57.
16. DHAR U, RAWAL RS AND UPRETI J. 2000. Setting priorities for conservation of medicinal plants-a case study in the Indian Himalaya. Biol Conser 95(1): 57-65.
17. DZEREFOS CM AND WITKOWSKI ETF. 2001. Density and potential utilization of medicinal grassland plants from Abe Bailey Nature Reserve, South Africa. Biod Cons 10: 1875-1896.
18. FERRAZ JSF, ALBUQUERQUE UPA AND MEUNIER IMJ. 2006. Valor de uso e estrutura da vegetação lenhosa às margens do Riacho do Navio, Floresta, PE, Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 20(1): 125-134.
19. FLORENTINO ATN, ARAÚJO EL AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2007. Contribuição de quintais agroflorestais na conservação de plantas da Caatinga, município de Caruaru, PE, Brasil. Acta Bot Bras 21(1): 37-47.
20. GALEANO G. 2000. Forest use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colômbia: a quantitative approach. Econ Bot 54: 358-376.
21. GAUGRIS JY AND VAN ROOYEN MW. 2006. Questionnaires do not work? A comparison of methods used to evaluate the structure of buildings and wood used in Rural Households, South Africa. Ethn Res Appl 4: 119-131.
22. GAVIN MC AND ANDERSON GJ. 2005. Testing a rapid quantitative ethnobiological technique: first steps towards developing a critical conservation tool. Econ Bot 59: 112-121.
23. HANAZAKI N, SOUZA VC AND RODRIGUES RR. 2006. Ethnobotany of rural people from the boundaries of Carlos Botelho State Park, São Paulo State, Brazil. Acta Bot Bras 20(4): 899-909.
24. HOFFMAN B AND GALLAHER T. 2007. Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethn Res Appl 5: 201-218.
25. KRISTENSEN M AND BALSLEV H. 2003. Perceptions, use and availability of woody plants among the Gourounsi in Burkina Faso. Biodivers Conserv 12: 1715-1739.
26. KVIST LP, ANDERSEN MK, STAGEGAARD J, HESSELSOE M AND LLAPAPASCA C. 2001. Extraction from woody forest plants in flood plain communities in Amazonian Peru: use, choice, evaluation and conservation status of resources. Forest Ecol Manage 150: 147-174.
27. LA TORRE-CUADROS M AND ISLEBE GA. 2003. Traditional ecological knowledge and use of vegetation in southeastern Mexico: a case study from Solferino, Quintana Roo Biodivers Conserv 12: 2455-2476.
28. LUCENA RFP, ALBUQUERQUE UP, MONTEIRO JM, ALMEIDA CFCBR, FLORENTINO ATN AND FERRAZ JSF. 2007a. Useful plants of the semi-arid northeastern region of Brazil-a look at their conservation and sustainable use. Envir Monit Asses 125: 281-290.
29. LUCENA RFP, ARAUJO EL AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2007b. Does the use-value of woody plants of the Caatinga (Northeastern Brazil) explain their local availability. Econ Bot 61: 347-361.
30. LUCENA RFP, ARAÚJO HFP, MOURÃO JS AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2005. A flor chegou, chuva avisou: metereologia popular no semi-árido paraibano. In: ALVES AGC, LUCENA RPF AND ALBUQUERQUE UP (Eds), Atualidades em Etnobiologia e Etnoecologia. NUPEEA, Recife, p. 171-182.
31. LUCENA RFP, NASCIMENTO VT, ARAUJO EL AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2008. Local uses of native plants in an area of caatinga vegetation (Pernambuco, NE-Brazil). Ethn Res & Appl 6: 3-13.
32. LYKKE AM, KRISTENSEN MK AND GANABA S. 2004. Valuation of local use and dynamics of 56 woody species in the Sahel. Biodivers Conserv 13: 1961-2004.
33. MEDEIROS PM, ALMEIDA ALS, LUCENA RFP, SOUTO FJB AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2010. Uso de estímulos visuais na pesquisa etnobiológica. In: ALBUQUERQUE UP, LUCENA RFP AND CUNHA LVFC (Eds), Métodos e técnicas na pesquisa etnobiológica e etnoecológica. NUPEEA, Recife, p. 151-169.
34. MONTEIRO JM, LUCENA RFP, ALENCAR NL, NASCIMENTO VT, ARAÚJO TAS AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2008. When intention matters: comparing three ethnobotanical data collection strategies. In: ALBUQUERQUE UP AND RAMOS MA (Orgs), Current Topics in Ethnobotany. Research Signpost, India, p. 113-124.
35. MUELLER-DUMBOIS D AND ELLENBERG H. 1974. Aims and methods os vegetation ecology. New York: J Wiley & Sons, 574 p.
36. OLIVEIRA RLC, LINS-NETO EMF, ARAUJO EL AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2007. Conservation priorities and population structure of woody medicinal plants in area of Caatinga vegetation (Pernambuco State, NE Brazil). Environ Monit and Asses 132: 189-206.
37. PHILLIPS O AND GENTRY AH. 1993. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Econ Bot 47: 33-43.
38. RAMOS MA, MEDEIROS PM, ALMEIDA ALS, FELICIANO ALP AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2008a. Use and knowledge of fuelwood in an area of caatinga vegetation in NE Brazil. Biomass Bioenerg 32: 510-517.
39. RAMOS MA, MEDEIROS PM, ALMEIDA ALS, FELICIANO ALP AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2008b. Can wood quality justify local preferences for firewood in an area of caatinga (dryland) vegetation. Biomass Bioenerg 32: 503-509.
40. ROSSATO SC, LEITÃO-FILHO HF AND BEGOSSI A. 1999. Ethnobotay of Caiçaras of the Atlantic Forest Coast (Brazil). Econ Bot 53: 387-395.
41. SÁAND SILVA IMM, MARANGON LC, HANAZAKI N AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2009. Use and knowledge of fuelwood in three rural caatinga (dryland) communities in NE Brazil. Enviro Develop Sustain 11: 833-852.
42. SANTOS JP, ARAÚJO EL AND ALBUQUERQUE UP. 2008. Richness and distribution os useful Woody plants in the semi-arid region os northeastern Brazil. J Arid Environ 72: 652-663.
43. STAGEGAARD J, SORENSENB M AND KVIST LP. 2002. Estimations of the importance of plant resources extracted by inhabitants of the Peruvian Amazon flood plains. Persp Plan Ecol Evol System 5: 103-122.
44. SEBRAE-PB. 1998. Soledade. Série Diagnóstico. Sócio-Econômico. João Pessoa, Paraíba.
45. ZAR JH. 1996. Bioestatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, London.