Accuracy and reliability assessment of CT and MR perfusion analysis software using a digital phantom

Radiology

Volumn 267, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 201-211

  Kudo, Kohsuke ^a   Christensen, Soren ^b   Sasaki, Makoto ^a   Østergaard, Leif ^c   Shirato, Hiroki ^d   Ogasawara, Kuniaki ^a   Wintermark, Max ^e   Warach, Steven ^f  

^a IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^d HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3 (4,5 DIMETHYL 2 THIAZOLYL) 2,5 DIPHENYLTETRAZOLIUM BROMIDE; TRACER;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN BLOOD VOLUME; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL IMAGING; ERROR; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; KINETICS; MEAN TRANSIT TIME; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; PLASMA CONCENTRATION-TIME CURVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGY PHANTOM; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; THERAPY DELAY; TIME TO MAXIMUM PLASMA CONCENTRATION;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BLOOD VOLUME; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84875473343     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112618     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Klotz E, König M. Perfusion measurements of the brain: using dynamic CT for the quantitative assessment of cerebral ischemia in acute stroke. Eur J Radiol 1999;30(3):170-184.
2. Mayer TE, Hamann GF, Baranczyk J, et al. Dynamic CT perfusion imaging of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21(8): 1441-1449.
3. Lev MH, Segal AZ, Farkas J, et al. Utility of perfusion-weighted CT imaging in acute middle cerebral artery stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: prediction of final infarct volume and clinical outcome. Stroke 2001;32(9):2021-2028.
4. Jain R, Hoeffner EG, Deveikis JP, Harrigan MR, Thompson BG, Mukherji SK. Carotid perfusion CT with balloon occlusion and acetazolamide challenge test: feasibility. Radiology 2004;231(3):906-913.
5. Laslo AM, Eastwood JD, Chen FX, Lee TY. Dynamic CT perfusion imaging in subarachnoid hemorrhage-related vasospasm. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27(3):624-631.
6. Cenic A, Nabavi DG, Craen RA, Gelb AW, Lee TY. A CT method to measure hemodynamics in brain tumors: validation and application of cerebral blood flow maps. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21(3):462-470.
7. Olivot JM, Mlynash M, Thijs VN, et al. Optimal Tmax threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute stroke. Stroke 2009; 40(2):469-475.
8. Davis SM, Donnan GA. Advances in penumbra imaging with MR. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004; 17(Suppl 3):23-27.
9. Rose SE, Janke AL, Griffin M, Finnigan S, Chalk JB. Improved prediction of final infarct volume using bolus delay-corrected perfusion-weighted MRI: implications for the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 2004;35(11): 2466-2471.
10. Sasaki M, Kudo K, Honjo K, Hu JQ, Wang HB, Shintaku K. Prediction of infarct volume and neurologic outcome by using automated multiparametric perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in a primate model of permanent middle cerebral artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2011;31(2): 448-456.
11. Kudo K, Sasaki M, Ogasawara K, Terae S, Ehara S, Shirato H. Difference in tracer delay-induced effect among deconvolution algorithms in CT perfusion analysis: quantitative evaluation with digital phantoms. Radiology 2009;251(1):241-249.
12. Kudo K, Sasaki M, Yamada K, et al. Differences in CT perfusion maps generated by different commercial software: quantitative analysis by using identical source data of acute stroke patients. Radiology 2010; 254(1):200-209.
13. Christensen S, Mouridsen K, Wu O, et al. Comparison of 10 perfusion MRI parameters in 97 sub-6-hour stroke patients using voxel-based receiver operating characteristics analysis. Stroke 2009;40(6):2055-2061.
14. Dani KA, Thomas RG, Chappell FM, et al. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in ischemic stroke: definitions and thresholds. Ann Neurol 2011; 70(3):384-401.
15. Wintermark M, Albers GW, Alexandrov AV, et al. Acute stroke imaging research roadmap. Stroke 2008;39(5):1621-1628.
16. Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, Gyldensted C, Rosen BR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36(5):715-725.
17. Wu O, østergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Benner T, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50(1):164-174.
18. Meier P, Zierler KL. On the theory of the indicator- dilution method for measurement of blood flow and volume. J Appl Physiol 1954; 6(12):731-744.
19. Davis SM, Donnan GA, Parsons MW, et al. Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7(4):299-309.
20. Straka M, Albers GW, Bammer R. Realtime diffusion-perfusion mismatch analysis in acute stroke. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32(5):1024-1037.
21. Calamante F, Christensen S, Desmond PM, Ostergaard L, Davis SM, Connelly A. The physiological significance of the time-tomaximum (Tmax) parameter in perfusion MRI. Stroke 2010;41(6):1169-1174.
22. Mouridsen K, Friston K, Hjort N, Gyldensted L, østergaard L, Kiebel S. Bayesian estimation of cerebral perfusion using a physiological model of microvasculature. Neuroimage 2006;33(2):570-579.