Patient-perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): Interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient's perspective

Pain

Volumn 121, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 151-157

  Ten Klooster, Peter M ^a   Drossaers Bakker, K Wiepke ^b   Taal, Erik ^a   Van De Laar, Martin A F J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b MEDISCH SPECTRUM TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Minimal clinically important difference; Musculoskeletal pain; Pain measurement; Patient perceived satisfactory improvement; Visual analogue scales

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTEROID;

ADULT; ARTHRITIS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADRENAL CORTEX HORMONES; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTHRITIS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 32944465827     PISSN: 03043959     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.12.021     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. R.H. Aseltine Jr., K.J. Carlson, F.J. Fowler Jr., and M.J. Barry Comparing prospective and retrospective measures of treatment outcomes Med Care 33 1995 AS67 AS76
2. D.E. Beaton, C. Bombardier, J.N. Katz, and J.G. Wright A taxonomy for responsiveness J Clin Epidemiol 54 2001 1204 1217
3. F. Benedetti, S. Vighetti, M. Amanzio, C. Casadio, A. Oliaro, and B. Bergamasco Dose-response relationship of opioids in nociceptive and neuropathic postoperative pain Pain 74 1998 205 211
4. S.B. Bird, and E.W. Dickson Clinically significant changes in pain along the visual analog scale Ann Emerg Med 38 2001 639 643
5. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310
6. D. Cella, E.A. Hahn, and K. Dineen Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: differences between improvement and worsening Qual Life Res 11 2002 207 221
7. M.S. Cepeda, J.M. Africano, R. Polo, R. Alcala, and D.B. Carr What decline in pain intensity is meaningful to patients with acute pain? Pain 105 2003 151 157
8. R.D. Crosby, R.L. Kolotkin, and G.R. Williams Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life J Clin Epidemiol 56 2003 395 407
9. L.J. DeLoach, M.S. Higgins, A.B. Caplan, and J.L. Stiff The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intrasubject variability and correlation with a numeric scale Anesth Analg 86 1998 102 106
10. R.A. Deyo, and R.M. Centor Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance J Chronic Dis 39 1986 897 906
11. R.A. Deyo, and D.L. Patrick The significance of treatment effects: the clinical perspective Med Care 33 1995 AS286 AS291
12. S. Dhanani, J. Quenneville, M. Perron, M. Abdolell, and B.M. Feldman Minimal difference in pain associated with change in quality of life in children with rheumatic disease Arthritis Rheum 47 2002 501 505
13. R.H. Dworkin, D.C. Turk, J.T. Farrar, J.A. Haythornthwaite, M.P. Jensen, and N.P. Katz Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations Pain 113 2005 9 19
14. J.T. Farrar, J.P. Young, L. LaMoreaux, J.L. Werth, and R.M. Poole Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale Pain 94 2001 149 158
15. J.T. Farrar What is clinically meaningful: outcome measures in pain clinical trials Clin J Pain 16 2000 S106 S112
16. J.S. Feine, G.J. Lavigne, T.T. Dao, C. Morin, and J.P. Lund Memories of chronic pain and perceptions of relief Pain 77 1998 137 141
17. D.T. Felson, and J.J. Anderson A review of evidence on the discriminant validity of outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis J Rheumatol 28 2001 422 426
18. D. Fischer, A.L. Stewart, D.A. Bloch, K. Lorig, D. Laurent, and H. Holman Capturing the patient's view of change as a clinical outcome measure J Am Med Assoc 282 1999 1157 1162
19. J.L. Fleiss The design and analysis of clinical experiments 1986 Wiley New York
20. B. Giraudeau, S. Rozenberg, and J.P. Valat Assessment of the clinically relevant change in pain for patients with sciatica Ann Rheum Dis 63 2004 1180 1181
21. M. Grzybowski, and J.G. Younger Statistical methodology: III. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves Acad Emerg Med 4 1997 818 826
22. G.H. Guyatt, D. Osoba, A.W. Wu, K.W. Wyrwich, and G.R. Norman Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures Mayo Clin Proc 77 2002 371 383
23. G.H. Guyatt, G.R. Norman, E.F. Juniper, and L.E. Griffith A critical look at transition ratings J Clin Epidemiol 55 2002 900 908
24. M. Haas, J. Nyiendo, and M. Aickin One-year trend in pain and disability relief recall in acute and chronic ambulatory low back pain patients Pain 95 2002 83 91
25. J.A. Hanley, and B.J. McNeil A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases Radiology 148 1983 839 843
26. R.D. Hays, and J.M. Woolley The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics 18 2000 419 423
27. R. Jaeschke, J. Singer, and G.H. Guyatt Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference Control Clin Trials 10 1989 407 415
28. M.P. Jensen, C. Chen, and A.M. Brugger Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain J Pain 4 2003 407 414
29. A.M. Kelly The minimum clinically significant difference in visual analogue scale pain score does not differ with severity of pain Emerg Med J 18 2001 205 207
30. A.M. Kelly Setting the benchmark for research in the management of acute pain in emergency departments Emerg Med (Fremantle) 13 2001 57 60
31. T.J. Kropmans, P.U. Dijkstra, B. Stegenga, R. Stewart, and L.G. de Bont Repeated assessment of temporomandibular joint pain: reasoned decision-making with use of unidimensional and multidimensional pain scales Clin J Pain 18 2002 107 115
32. Kvien TK, Dougados M, Mowinckel P, Skomsvoll JF, Mikkelsen K. Values for Minimal Clinically Important Improvement (MCII) in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (Poster). Annual Scientific Meeting of the American College of Rheumatology, San Antonio, Texas, 2004.
33. M.N. Lassere, D. van der Heijde, K.R. Johnson, M. Boers, and J. Edmonds Reliability of measures of disease activity and disease damage in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for smallest detectable difference, minimal clinically important difference, and analysis of treatment effects in randomized controlled trials J Rheumatol 28 2001 892 903
34. J.S. Lee, E. Hobden, I.G. Stiell, and G.A. Wells Clinically important change in the visual analog scale after adequate pain control Acad Emerg Med 10 2003 1128 1130
35. A. Moore, H. McQuay, and D. Gavaghan Deriving dichotomous outcome measures from continuous data in randomised controlled trials of analgesics Pain 66 1996 229 237
36. G.R. Norman, P. Stratford, and G. Regehr Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach J Clin Epidemiol 50 1997 869 879
37. F. Salaffi, A. Stancati, C.A. Silvestri, A. Ciapetti, and W. Grassi Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale Eur J Pain 8 2004 283 291
38. J.L. Seres The fallacy of using 50% pain relief as the standard for satisfactory pain treatment outcome Pain Forum 8 1999 183 188
39. D.L. Scott, J.E. Dacre, A. Greenwood, L. Treasure, and E.C. Huskisson Can we develop simple response criteria for slow acting antirheumatic drugs? Ann Rheum Dis 49 1990 196 198
40. P.W. Stratford, J.M. Binkley, D.L. Riddle, and G.H. Guyatt Sensitivity to change of the Roland-Morris Back Pain Questionnaire: part 1 Phys Ther 78 1998 1186 1196
41. K.H. Todd Patient-oriented outcome measures: the promise of definition Ann Emerg Med 38 2001 672 674
42. F. Tubach, P. Ravaud, G. Baron, B. Falissard, I. Logeart, and N. Bellamy Evaluation of clinically relevant changes in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the minimal clinically important improvement Ann Rheum Dis 64 2005 29 33
43. F. Tubach, P. Ravaud, G. Baron, B. Falissard, I. Logeart, and N. Bellamy Evaluation of clinically relevant states in patient reported outcomes in knee and hip osteoarthritis: the patient acceptable symptom state Ann Rheum Dis 64 2005 34 37
44. P. Tugwell, M. Boers, P.M. Brooks, L. Simon, and C.V. Strand OMERACT 5: International consensus conference on outcome measures in rheumatology J Rheumatol 28 2001 395 397
45. D.M. van der Heijde, M.A. van 't Hof, P.L. van Riel, L.A. Theunisse, E.W. Lubberts, and M.A. van Leeuwen Judging disease activity in clinical practice in rheumatoid arthritis: first step in the development of a disease activity score Ann Rheum Dis 49 1990 916 920
46. M.M. Ward, A.S. Marx, and N.N. Barry Identification of clinically important changes in health status using receiver operating characteristic curves J Clin Epidemiol 53 2000 279 284
47. G. Wells, J. Anderson, D. Beaton, N. Bellamy, M. Boers, and C. Bombardier Minimal clinically important difference module: summary, recommendations, and research agenda J Rheumatol 28 2001 452 454
48. F. Wolfe, K. Michaud, and V. Strand Expanding the definition of clinical differences: from minimally clinically important differences to really important differences. Analyses in 8931 patients with rheumatoid arthritis J Rheumatol 32 2005 583 589