Computer-assisted assessment of ocular synkinesis: A comparison of methods

Laryngoscope

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 879-883

  Kleiss, Ingrid J ^a,b   Hohman, Marc H ^a   Quatela, Olivia E ^a   Marres, Henri A M ^b   Hadlock, Tessa A ^a  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

assessment; Facial Assessment by Computer Evaluation; Facial nerve; facial paralysis; Glasgow Facial Palsy Scale; objective; ocular synkinesis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE MOVEMENT DISORDER; FACIAL EXPRESSION; GLASGOW FACIAL PALSY SCALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OCULAR SYNKINESIS; PALPEBRAL FISSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SELF EVALUATION; SYNKINESIS;

DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EYE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FACIAL PARALYSIS; HUMANS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOFTWARE; SYNKINESIS; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84875411543     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.23778     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Husseman J, Mehta RP,. Management of synkinesis. Facial Plast Surg 2008; 24: 242-249.
2. Beurskens CH, Heymans PG,. Mime therapy improves facial symmetry in people with long-term facial nerve paresis: a randomised controlled trial. Aust J Physiother 2006; 52: 177-183.
3. Lindsay RW, Robinson M, Hadlock TA,. Comprehensive facial rehabilitation improves function in people with facial paralysis: a 5-year experience at the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 391-397.
4. Borodic G, Bartley M, Slattery W, et al. Botulinum toxin for aberrant facial nerve regeneration: double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using subjective endpoints. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 36-43.
5. Henstrom DK, Malo JS, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA,. Platysmectomy: an effective intervention for facial synkinesis and hypertonicity. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011; 13: 239-243.
6. House JW, Brackmann DE,. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 146-147.
7. Vrabec JT, Backous DD, Djalilian HR, et al. Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140: 445-450.
8. Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM,. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 114: 380-386.
9. Coulson SE, Croxson GR, Adams RD, O'Dwyer NJ,. Reliability of the "Sydney," "Sunnybrook," and "House Brackmann" facial grading systems to assess voluntary movement and synkinesis after facial nerve paralysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005; 132: 543-549.
10. Mehta RP, WernickRobinson M, Hadlock TA,. Validation of the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire. Laryngoscope 2007; 117: 923-926.
11. Hadlock TA, Urban LS,. Toward a universal, automated facial measurement tool in facial reanimation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2012; 14: 277-282.
12. O'Reilly BF, Soraghan JJ, McGrenary S, He S,. Objective method of assessing and presenting the House-Brackmann and regional grades of facial palsy by production of a facogram. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31: 486-491.
13. Kecskes G, Jori J, O'Reilly BF, Viharos L, Rovo L,. Clinical assessment of a new computerised objective method of measuring facial palsy. Clin Otolaryngol 2011; 36: 313-319.
14. Rufer F, Schroder A, Erb C,. White-to-white corneal diameter: normal values in healthy humans obtained with the Orbscan II topography system. Cornea 2005; 24: 259-261.
15. Bray D, Henstrom DK, Cheney ML, Hadlock TA,. Assessing outcomes in facial reanimation: evaluation and validation of the SMILE system for measuring lip excursion during smiling. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2010; 12: 352-354.
16. Harris PA, Mendelson BC,. Eyelid and midcheek anatomy. In:, Fagien S, Putterman AM, eds. Putterman's Cosmetic Oculoplastic Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier; 2008: 45-63.
17. Cook BE, Lucarelli MJ,. Anatomical correlates of eyelid surgery. In:, Nesi FA, Gladstone GJ, eds. Ophthalmic and Facial Plastic Surgery. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; 2001: 27-32.
18. Manktelow RT, Zuker RM, Tomat LR,. Facial paralysis measurement with a handheld ruler. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 435-442.
19. Linstrom CJ,. Objective facial motion analysis in patients with facial nerve dysfunction. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 1129-1147.
20. Wood DA, Hughes GB, Secic M, Good TL,. Objective measurement of normal facial movement with video microscaling. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 61-65.
21. Johnson PC, Brown H, Kuzon WM Jr, Balliet R, Garrison JL, Campbell J,. Simultaneous quantitation of facial movements: the maximal static response assay of facial nerve function. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 171-179.
22. Isono M, Murata K, Tanaka H, Kawamoto M, Azuma H,. An objective evaluation method for facial mimic motion. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996; 114: 27-31.
23. Tomat LR, Manktelow RT,. Evaluation of a new measurement tool for facial paralysis reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 696-704.
24. Rogers CR, Schmidt KL, VanSwearingen JM, et al. Automated facial image analysis: detecting improvement in abnormal facial movement after treatment with botulinum toxin A. Ann Plast Surg 2007; 58: 39-47.
25. Neely JG, Cheung JY, Wood M, Byers J, Rogerson A,. Computerized quantitative dynamic analysis of facial motion in the paralyzed and synkinetic face. Am J Otol 1992; 13: 97-107.
26. Meier-Gallati V, Scriba H, Fisch U,. Objective scaling of facial nerve function based on area analysis (OSCAR). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998; 118: 545-550.
27. Mehta RP, Zhang S, Hadlock TA,. Novel 3-D video for quantification of facial movement. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 138: 468-472.
28. Salgado MD, Curtiss S, Tollefson TT,. Evaluating symmetry and facial motion using 3D videography. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2010; 18: 351-356, Table of Contents.