Use of augmented reality-based training with EMG-triggered functional electric stimulation in stroke rehabilitation

Journal of Physical Therapy Science

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 147-151

  Jung, Go Un ^a   Moon, Tae Ho ^a   Park, Gun Woo ^a   Lee, Jun Young ^a   Lee, Byoung Hee ^a  

^a Sahmyook University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; EMG triggered FES; Stroke

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875403089     PISSN: 09155287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.25.147     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. American Heart Association. heart disease and stroke statistics 2004 update.
2. Carr J, Shepherd R: Stroke rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2003.
3. Walker C, Brouwer BJ, Culham EG: Use of visual feedback in retraining balance following acute stroke. Phys Ther, 2000, 80: 886-895. [Medline]
4. Tyson SF, Hanley M, Chillala J, et al.: Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther, 2006, 86: 30-38. [Medline]
5. Campbell FM, Ashburn AM, Pickering RM, et al.: Head and pelvic movements during a dynamic reaching task in sitting: implications for physical therapists. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2001, 82: 1655-1660. [Medline] [CrossRef]
6. Schoenfelder DP, Van Why K: A fall prevention educational program for community dwelling seniors. Public Health Nurs, 1997, 14: 383-390. [Medline] [CrossRef]
7. Umphred DA, Burton GU, Lazaro RT: Neurological rehabilitation (5th ed), New York: Elsevier Science Health Science Div, 2007.
8. Bobath B: Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. London: William Heineman Medical Books, 1970.
9. Voss DE, Knott M: Patterns of motion for proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation. Br J Phys Med, 1954, 17: 191-198. [Medline]
10. Bolton DA, Cauraugh JH, Hausenblas HA: Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and stroke motor recovery of arm/hand functions: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci, 2004, 223: 121-127. [Medline] [CrossRef]
11. Cauraugh JH, Kim S: Two coupled motor recovery protocols are better than one: Electromyogram-triggered neuromuscular stimulation and bilateral movements. Stroke, 2002, 33: 1589-1594. [Medline] [CrossRef]
12. Holden MK: Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation Review. Cyberpsychol Behav, 2005, 8: 187-211. [Medline] [CrossRef]
13. Coleman KA, Harry J: Functional gait changes in patients with chronic lower extremity hemiplegia treated with technology to induce movement (TIM)-type system. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2004, 11: 43-54. [Medline] [CrossRef]
14. Deutsch JE, Merieans AS, Adamovich S, et al.: Development and application of virtual reality technology to improve hand use and gait of individuals post-stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2004, 22: 371-386. [Medline]
15. Kim YW, Weon DH, Chung DI: Effects of Functional Electrical Stimulation on Gait Patterns in Stroke Patient. Korean Acad Univ Trained Phys Ther, 2000, 7: 72-80.
16. Cram JR, Kasman GS, Holtz J: Introduction to Surface Electromyography (1st ed.), Aspen Pub, 1998.
17. Reese NB: Muscle and Sensory Testing (2nd ed), New York: Elsevier, 2005, pp 535-544.
18. Verheyden G, Vereeck L, Truijen S, et al.: Trunk performance after stroke and the relationship with balance, gait and functional ability. Clin Rehabil, 2006, 20: 451-458. [Medline] [CrossRef]
19. Dunning K, Levine P, Schmitt L, et al.: An ankle to computer virtual reality system for improving gait and function in a person 9 months poststroke. Top Stroke Rehabil, 2008, 15: 602-610. [Medline] [CrossRef]
20. Pandyan AD, Vuadens P, van Wijck FM, et al.: Are we underestimating the clinical efficacy of botulinum toxin (type A)? Quantifying changes in spasticity, strength and upper limb function after injections of BotoxR to the elbow flexors in a unilateral stroke population. Clin Rehabil, 2002, 16: 654-660. [Medline] [CrossRef]
21. Mayer NH: Clinicophysiologic concepts of spasticity and motor dysfunction in adults with an upper motoneuron lesion. Muscle Nerve Suppl, 1997, 6: S1-S13. [Medline] [CrossRef]