The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations in labour

Women and Birth

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 49-54

  Shepherd, Ashley ^a   Cheyne, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Labour; Midwifery; Progress in labour; Vaginal examinations

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LABOR; LABOR INDUCTION; LABOR ONSET; MATERNAL CARE; MIDWIFE; PELVIC EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HUMANS; LABOR, OBSTETRIC; MIDWIFERY; NURSE MIDWIVES; NURSE'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCOTLAND;

EID: 84875398865     PISSN: 18715192     EISSN: 18781799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Phelps J.Y., Higby K., Smyth M.H., Ward J.A., Arredondo F., Mayer A. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995, 173(3):942-945.
2. McKay S., Roberts J. Obstetrics by ear: maternal and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of maternal sounds during second stage labour. J Nurs Midwifery 1990, 35(5):266-273.
3. Baker A., Kenner A.N. Communication of pain: vocalization as an indicator of the stage of labour. Aust N Z Obstet Gynaecol 1993, 33(4):384-385.
4. Buchmann E.J., Libhaber E. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2007, 144:833-837.
5. Neilson J.P., Lavender T., Quenby S., Wray S. Obstructed labour. Br Med Bull 2003, 67:191-204.
6. Ying Lai C., Levy V. Hong Kong Chinese women's experiences of vaginal examinations in labour. Midwifery 2002, 18:296-303.
7. Murphy K., Grieg V., Garcia J., Grant A. Maternal considerations in the use of pelvic examinations in labour. Midwifery 1986, 2:93-97.
8. Clement S. Unwanted vaginal examinations. Brit J Midwifery 1994, 2:368-370.
9. Seaward P.G., Hannah M.E., Myhr T.L., Farine D., Ohlsson A., Wang E.E., et al. International multicenter term PROM study: evaluation of predictors of neonatal infection in infants born to patients with premature rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998, 179(3):635-639.
10. Imseis H.M., Trout W.C., Gabbe S.G. The microbiologic effect of digital cervical examination. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 180:578-580.
11. Dixon L., Foureur M. The vaginal examination during labour: is it of benefit or harm?. N Z Coll Midwifery 2010, 42:21-26.
12. Warren C. Why should I do vaginal examinations?. Pract Midwifery 1999, 2(6):12-13.
13. Cheyne H., Hundley V., Dowding D., Bland J.M., McNamee P., Greer I., et al. Effects of algorithm for diagnosis of active labour: cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2008, 337(7683):1396-1400.
14. World Health Organisation Safe motherhood - care in normal birth: a practical guide 1997, WHO, Geneva, Available at, [accessed 26.01.12]. http://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/who_frh_msm_9624/en/.
15. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Intimate examinations: report of a working party 1997, RCOG Press, London.
16. Shepherd A., Cheyne H., Kennedy S., McIntosh C., Styles M., Niven C. The purple line as a measure of labour progress: a longitudinal study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010, 10:54.
17. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2007 clinical guideline 55: intrapartum care. [accessed 03.11.11]. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG55/Guidance/pdf/English.
18. UK Clinical Standards Advisory Group Women in normal labour. Tindall VR 1995, HMSO, London.
19. Information and statistics division Scotland. [accessed 12.11.11]. http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/1612.html.
20. Stuart M. Midwives' discources on vaginal examination in labour. PhD thesis. University of West of England; 2008.
21. World Health Organisation Preventing prolonged labour: a practical guide. The partograph. Part I: principles and strategy 1993, WHO, Geneva, Available at, [accessed 26.01.12]. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/1993/WHO_FHE_MSM_93.9.pdf.
22. Enkin M., Keirse M., Neilson J., Crowther C., Duley L., Hodnett E., et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth 2000, University Press, Oxford.
23. Hobbs L. Assessing cervical dilatation without VEs. Pract Midwifery 1998, 1(11):34-35.
24. Sookhoo M.L., Biott C. Learning at work: midwives judging progress in labour. Learn Health Soc Care 2002, 1(2):75-85.
25. Tuffnell D.J., Bryce F., Johnson N., Lilford R.J. Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment. Lancet 1989, 334(8671):1089-1090.
26. Huhn K.A., Brost B. Accuracy of simulated cervical dilatation and effacement measurements among practitioners. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:1797-1799.
27. Bryne D.L., Edmonds D.K. Clinical method for evaluating progress in first stage of labour. Lancet 1990, 335:122.
28. Fraser D., Cooper M. Myles textbook for midwives 2009, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh. 15th edition.
29. Mayes midwifery 2004, Balliere Tindall, London. 13th edition. C. Henderson, S. MacDonald (Eds.).
30. Wickham S. Assessing cervical dilatation without VEs: watching the purple line. Pract Midwifery 2007, 10(1):26-27.
31. Devane D. Sexuality and midwifery. Br J Midwifery 1996, 4:413-416.
32. Lewin D., Fearon B., Hemmings V., Johnson G. Women's experiences of vaginal examinations in labour. Midwifery 2005, 21:267-277.
33. Bergstrom L., Roberts J., Skillman L., Seidel J. "You'll feel me touching you sweetie": vaginal examinations during the second stage of labor. Birth 1992, 19(1):10-18.
34. Downe S., Dykes F. Counting time in pregnancy and labour. Childbirth, midwifery and concepts of time 2009, Berghahn Books. C. McCourt (Ed.).
35. Walsh D. Assessing women's progress in labour. Br J Midwifery 2000, 8(7):449-457.