Accuracy of simulated cervical dilation and effacement measurements among practitioners

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 191, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1797-1799

  Huhn, Kathleen A ^a   Brost, Brian C ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cervix; Dilation; Effacement; Labor assessment; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LEARNING; NURSE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENT; SIMULATION; UTERINE CERVIX DILATATION;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LABOR STAGE, FIRST; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OBSTETRICS; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 8544241731     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.07.062     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. J.Y. Phelps, K. Higby, M.H. Smyth, J.A. Ward, F. Arrendondo, and A.R. Mayer Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements, 1995 Am J Obstet Gynecol 173 1995 942 945
2. J.Y. Phelps, N. Lambrou, and D. Roshanfekr Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation and effacement measurements Prim Care Update Ob Gyns 5 1998 185
3. D.J. Tuffnell, N. Johnson, F. Bryce, and R.J. Lilford Simulation of cervical changes in labour: reproducibility of expert assessment Lancet 2 1989 1089 1090