Evaluating where we're at with differential response

Child Abuse and Neglect

Volumn 37, Issue 2-3, 2013, Pages 125-132

  Kyte, Alicia ^a   Trocmé, Nico ^b   Chamberland, Claire ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD SAFETY; CHILD WELFARE; COMMUNITY CARE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FAMILY ASSESSMENT; FAMILY DECISION MAKING; FAMILY VIOLENCE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; LAW; MASS SCREENING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; POLICY; POPULATION RISK; PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE; RESPONSIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SATISFACTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; COMMUNITY NETWORKS; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84875390509     PISSN: 01452134     EISSN: 18737757     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Aarons G.A., Hurlburt M., Horwitz S. Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 2011, 38:4-23.
2. Baumann B., Kolko L., Collins D.J., Herschell K.A.D. Understanding practitioners' characteristics and perspectives prior to the dissemination of an evidence-based intervention. Child Abuse & Neglect 2006, 30(7):771-787.
3. Child Welfare Information Gateway [CWIG] Differential response to reports of child abuse and neglect 2008, Children's Bureau, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
4. Conley A. Differential response: A critical examination of a secondary prevention model. Children and Youth Services Review 2007, 29:1454-1468.
5. Conley A., Berrick J. Community-based child abuse prevention: Outcomes associated with a differential response program in California. Child Maltreatment 2010, 15(4):282-292.
6. Davidson K.W., Goldstein M., Kaplan R.M., Kauffmann P.G., Knatterud G.L., Orleans C.T., Spring B., Trudeau K.J., Whitlock E.P. Evidence-based behavioral medicine: What is it and how do we achieve it?. Annals of Behavioural Medicine 2003, 26(3):161-171.
7. English D.J., Wingard T., Marshall D., Orme M., Orme A. Alternative responses to child protective services: Emerging issues and concerns. Child Abuse & Neglect 2000, 24(3):375-387.
8. Huebner R.A., Durbin L., Brock A. Program evaluation of the multiple response system 2009, Kentucky Department for Community Based Services.
9. Institute of Applied Research St.Louis, Missouri Ohio alternative response evaluation: Final report 2010.
10. Institute of Applied Research St.Louis, Missouri Extended follow-up study of Minnesota's family assessment response final report conducted for Minnesota Department of Human Services 2006.
11. Institute of Applied Research St.Louis, Missouri Alternative response in three states 2005, Presentation to California CPS practitioners, March 2005.
12. Institute of Applied Research St.Louis, Missouri Missouri family assessment and response demonstration evaluation report, January 2000 2000.
13. Kaplan C., Merkel-Holguin L. Another look at the national study on differential response in child welfare. Protecting Children 2008, 23(1-2):5-21.
14. Kelley D., Konopka R., Baker C. Differential response. Child maltreatment prevention: Toward an evidence-based approach 2009, 47-52. Institute for Research on Poverty, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. K.S. Slack, K.M. Jack, L.M. Gjertson (Eds.).
15. Lawrence C.N., Rosanbalm K.D., Dodge K.A. Multiple response system: Evaluation of policy change in North Carolina's Child Welfare System. Children and Youth Services Review 2011, 33:2355-2365.
16. Loman L.A., Siegel G. Alternative response in Minnesota: Findings of the program evaluation. Protecting Children 2008, 20(2-3):78-92.
17. Loman L.A., Siegel G.L. Differential response in Missouri after five years: Final report 2004, Institute of Applied Research, St. Louis, MO.
18. Loman A., Siegel G. Alternative response in Minnesota: Findings of the program evaluation. Differential Response in Child Welfare, Protecting Children 2005, 20(2-3):78-92. Retrieved from www.iarstl.org/papers/ARinMNfromProtectingChildren.pdf.
19. Loman L.A. Differential response improves traditional investigations: Criminal arrests for severe physical and sexual abuse 2005, Institute of Applied Research, St. Louis, MO.
20. Marshall S.K., Charles G., Kendrick K., Pakalniskiene V. Comparing differential responses within child protective services: A longitudinal examination. Child Welfare 2010, 89(3):57-77.
21. Marts E.J., Lee E.O., McRoy R., McCroskey J. Point of engagement: Reducing disproportionality and improving child and family outcomes. Child Welfare 2008, 87(2):335-358.
22. Merkel-Holguin L., Kaplan C., Kwak A. National study on differential response in child welfare 2006, American Humane Association and Child Welfare League of America, Denver. CO.
23. Minnesota Department of Human Services. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/idcplg?IdcService=GET_DYNAMIC_CONVERSION&dDocName=id_001627&RevisionSelectionMethod=LatestReleased.
24. Office of Children and Family Services [OCFS]. (2011). Differential response in child protective services in New York State: Implementation, initial outcomes and impacts of pilot project. Report to the Governor and Legislature. New York State Office of Children and Family Services.
25. Ortiz M.J., Shusterman G.R., Fluke J.D. Outcomes for children with allegations of neglect who receive alternative response and traditional investigations: Findings from NCANDS. Protecting Children 2008, 23(1-2):57-70.
26. Pennell J., Burford G. Family group decision making: Protecting children and women. Child Welfare 2000, 79:131-158.
27. Quality Improvement Center on Differential Response in Child Protective Services [QIC-DR] Differential response in child protective services: A literature review 2009, Children's Bureau, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC.
28. Richardson J. Differential response: A literature review 2008, Children and Family Research Center, University of Illinois School of Social Work, Urbana, IL.
29. Schene P. The emergence of differential response. Differential Response in Child Welfare. Protecting Children 2005, 20.
30. Sedlak A.J., Mettenburg J., Basena M., Petta I., McPherson K., Greene A., Li S. Fourth national incidence study of child abuse and neglect (NIS-4): Report to congress 2010, U3man Services, Administration for Children and Families, Washington, DC.
31. Shusterman G.R., Hollinshead D., Fluke J.D., Yuan Y.T. Alternative response to child maltreatment: Findings from NCANDS 2005, US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/05/child-maltreat-resp/.
32. Siegel G. Lessons from the beginning of differential response: Why it works and when it doesn't 2012, A Monograph of the Institute of Applied Research, St. Louis, Missouri.
33. Tanaka M., Jamieson E., Wathen N., MacMillan H. Methodological standards for randomized controlled trials of interventions for preventing recurrence of child physical abuse and neglect. Child Abuse Review 2010, 19:21-38.
34. US Department of Health and Human Services and Children's Bureau and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation Alternative responses to child maltreatment: Findings from NCANDS 2005, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, Retrieved from http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/05/child-maltreat-resp/.
35. Waldfogel J. Rethinking the paradigm for child protection. The Future of Children 1998, 8:104-119.
36. Waldfogel J. Differential response. Preventing child maltreatment, community approaches 2009, 139-155. The Guilford Press, New York, NY. K.A. Dodge, D.L. Coleman (Eds.).