Differential response: A critical examination of a secondary prevention model

Children and Youth Services Review

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2007, Pages 1454-1468

  Conley, Amy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Child maltreatment prevention; Differential response

Indexed keywords

EID: 35148879551     PISSN: 01907409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.06.003     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Barth R.P. An experimental evaluation of in-home child abuse prevention services. Child Abuse & Neglect 15 (1991) 363-375
2. Besharov D.J., and Laumann L.A. Child abuse reporting. Society 33 4 (1996) 40-47
3. Bilukha O., Hahn R.A., Crosby A., Fullilove M.T., Liberman A., Oscicki E., et al. The effectiveness of early childhood home visitation in preventing violence: A systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 2S1 (2005) 11-39
4. Center for Child and Family Policy. Multiple Response System (MRS) evaluation report to the North Carolina Division of Social Services (NCDSS) (2004). http://www.pubpol.duke.edu/centers/child Retrieved online March 15, 2005 from the Center for Child and Family Policy web site http://www.pubpol.duke.edu/centers/child
5. Chaffin M., Bonner B.L., and Hill R.F. Family preservation and family support programs: Child maltreatment outcomes across client risk levels and program types. Child Abuse and Neglect 25 (2001) 1269-1289
6. Child Welfare Stakeholders Group. CWS Redesign: The future of California's child welfare services final report. Sacramento (2003). http://www.cwsredesign.ca.gov/res/pdf/CWSReport.pdf Retrieved online 12 March 2005 from the California child welfare services redesign web site http://www.cwsredesign.ca.gov/res/pdf/CWSReport.pdf
7. Connolly M. Differential responses in child care and protection: Innovative approaches in family-centered practice [Special Edition: Differential response in child welfare]. Protecting Children 20 2 and 3 (2005) 8-20
8. Daro D., McCurdy K., and Nelson C. Engagement and retention in voluntary parent support programs: Final report (2005). http://www.chapinhall.org/article_abstract.aspx?ar=1410&L2=60&L3=126 Retrieved online November 2, 2005 from the Chapin Hall Center for Children web site: http://www.chapinhall.org/article_abstract.aspx?ar=1410&L2=60&L3 =126
9. DePanfilis D., and Dubowitz H. Family connections: A program for preventing child neglect. Child Maltreatment 10 2 (2005) 108-123
10. Drake B., Jonson-Reid M., Way I., and Chung S. Substantiation and recidivism. Child Maltreatment 8 4 (2003) 248-260
11. Duggan A., McFarlane E., Fuddy L., Burrell L., Higman S.M., Windham A., et al. Randomized trial of a statewide home visiting program: Impact in preventing child abuse and neglect. Child Abuse & Neglect 28 (2004) 597-622
12. Duggan A.K., McFarlane E.C., Windham A.M., Rohde C.A., Salkever D.S., Fuddy L., et al. Evaluation of Hawaii's Healthy Start Program. The Future of Children 9 1 (1999) 66-90
13. Eamon M.K., and Koppel S. 'For reasons of poverty': Court challenges to child welfare practices and mandated programs. Children and Youth Services Review 26 (2004) 821-836
14. English D.J., Marshall D.B., Brummel S., and Orme M. Characteristics of repeated referrals to child protective services in Washington state. Child Maltreatment 4 4 (1999) 297-307
15. English D.J., Marshall D.B., Coghlan L., Brummel S., and Orme M. Causes and consequences of the substantiation decision in Washington state child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review 24 11 (2002) 817-851
16. English D.J., Wingard T., Marshall D., Orme M., and Orme A. Alternative responses to child protective services: Emerging issues and concerns. Child Abuse and Neglect 24 3 (2000) 375-388
17. Guterman N. Enrollment strategies in early home visitation to prevent physical child abuse and neglect and the "universal versus targeted" debate: A meta-analysis of population based and screening-based programs. Child Abuse & Neglect 23 9 (1999) 863-890
18. Guterman N. Stopping child maltreatment before it starts: Emerging horizons in early home visitation services (2001), Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks
19. Hiatt S.W., Sampson D., and Baird D. Paraprofessional home visitation: Conceptual and pragmatic considerations. Journal of Community Psychology 25 1 (1997) 77-93
20. Inkelas M., and Halfon N. Recidivism in child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review 19 3 (1997) 139-161
21. Korfmacher J. Home visiting: Promise & peril. The Signal 7 (1999) 1-8
22. Loman L.A., and Siegel G.L. Differential response in Missouri after five years (2004). http://iarstl.org/papers/MODiffResp2004a.pdf Retrieved online April 5, 2005 from the Institute of Applied Research website: http://iarstl.org/papers/MODiffResp2004a.pdf
23. Loman L.A., and Siegel G.L. Minnesota alternative response evaluation final report (2004). http://iarstl.org/papers/ARFinalEvaluationReport.pdf Retrieved online March 20, 2005 from the Institute of Applied Research website: http://iarstl.org/papers/ARFinalEvaluationReport.pdf
24. Lowry M. Four commentaries: How we can better protect children from abuse and neglect. The Future of Children 8 1 (1998) 123-126
25. MacLeod J., and Nelson G. Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse and Neglect 24 9 (2000) 1127-1149
26. McGuigan W.M., Katzev A.R., and Pratt C.C. Multi-level determinants of retention in a home-visiting child abuse prevention program. Child Abuse & Neglect 27 (2003) 363-380
27. Musick J.S., and Stott F.M. Paraprofessionals, parenting, and child development: Understanding the problems and seeking solutions. In: Meisels S., and Shonkoff J. (Eds). Handbook of early intervention (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K
28. Olds D.L., and Kitzman H. Review of research on home visiting for pregnant women and parents of young children. The Future of Children 3 3 (1993) 53-92
29. Olds D.L., Robinson J., O'Brien R., Luckey D.W., Pettitt L.M., Henderson C.R., et al. Home visiting by paraprofessionals and by nurses: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 110 3 (2002) 486-496
30. Pelton L. Personalistic attributions and client perspectives in child welfare: Implications for service delivery. In: Wills T.A. (Ed). Basic processes in helping (1982), Academic Press, New York
31. Pelton L. Four commentaries: How we can better protect children from abuse and neglect. The Future of Children 8 1 (1998) 126-129
32. Promising Practices Network. Nurse family partnership (2002). http://www.promisingpractices.net/program.asp?programid=16 Retrieved November 20, 2005, from the Promising Practices Network web site http://www.promisingpractices.net/program.asp?programid=16
33. Racino J.A. Innovations in family support: What are we learning?. Journal of Child and Family Studies 7 4 (1998) 433-449
34. Schene P., Oppenheimer S., and Senderling C. Choosing the path less traveled: Strengthening California families through differential response (2005). http://www.cwda.org/downloads/DifferentialResponsePolicyBrief_FINAL.pdf Retrieved October 25, 2006 from the County Welfare Directors Association of California web site http://www.cwda.org/downloads/DifferentialResponsePolicyBrief_FINAL.pdf
35. Sweet M.A., and Appelbaum M.I. Is home visiting an effective strategy? A meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development 75 5 (2004) 1435-1456
36. Thomas, K.L., Berrick, J.D., and Koren, M.K. (N.D.). Voluntary placement and the Title IV-E Waiver: Implementing reform in a changing child welfare context. Center for Social Services Research, Unpublished document.
37. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families/Children's Bureau and Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. National study of child protective services systems and reform efforts: Review of state CPS policy (2003), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
38. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children, Youth, and Families. Child maltreatment 2004 (2006), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm04/index.htm Retrieved online October 10, 2006 from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service, Administration for Children, Youth, and Families web site: http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cb/pubs/cm04/index.htm
39. Virginia Department of Social Services. Evaluation of the differential response system (2004). http://www.dss.virginia.gov/files/division/dfs/cps/reports/eval_drs_2004 .pdf Retrieved online April 20, 2005 from the Virginia Department of Social Services web site http://www.dss.virginia.gov/files/division/dfs/cps/reports/eval_drs_2004 .pdf
40. Wagner M., Spiker D., Linn M.I., Gerlach-Downie S., and Hernandez F. Dimensions of parental engagement in home visiting programs: Exploratory study. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education 23 4 (2003) 171-187
41. Waldfogel J. The future of child protection: How to break the cycle of abuse and neglect (1998), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
42. Waldfogel J. Rethinking the paradigm for child protection. The Future of Children 8 1 (1998) 104-119
43. Wasik B.H. Staffing issues for home visiting programs. The Future of Children 3 3 (1993) 140-157
44. Wasik B.H., and Roberts R.N. Home visitor characteristics, training, and supervision: Results of a national survey. Family Relations 43 (1994) 336-341
45. Wolock I., Sherman P., Feldman L.H., and Metzger B. Child abuse and neglect referral patterns: A longitudinal study. Children and Youth Services Review 23 1 (2001) 21-47
46. Yatchmenoff D.K. Measuring client engagement from the client's perspective in nonvoluntary child protective services. Research on Social Work Practice 15 2 (2005) 84-96
47. Yoshikama R.T., and Emlen A.C. A comparison of voluntary and court-ordered foster care: Decisions services, and parental choice (1983), The Children's Bureau, Administration for Children, Youth, and Families, Office of Human Development Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, D.C.