On the selection of the weighting parameter value in Principal Covariates Regression

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Volumn 123, Issue , 2013, Pages 36-43

  Vervloet, Marlies ^a   Van Deun, Katrijn ^a   Van den Noortgate, Wim ^a   Ceulemans, Eva ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Dimension reduction; Principal Covariates Regression; Regression models; Weighting

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; PRINCIPAL COVARIATE REGRESSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL DISTRIBUTION; VALIDATION PROCESS; WEIGHT;

EID: 84875357848     PISSN: 01697439     EISSN: 18733239     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bro R., Nielsen H.H., Stefánsson G., Skåra T. A phenomenological study of ripening of salted herring. Assessing homogeneity of data from different countries and laboratories. Journal of Chemometrics 2002, 16:81-88.
2. Kiers H.A.L., Smilde A.K. A comparison of various methods for multivariate regression with highly collinear variables. Statistical Methods and Applications 2007, 16:193-228.
3. Tibshirani R. Regression, shrinking and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B Methodological 1996, 58:267-288.
4. Aldrin M. Reduced-rank regression. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 2002, 1724-1728. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. A.H. El-Shaarawi, W.W. Piegorsch (Eds.).
5. Jolliffe I.T. A note on the use of principal components in regression. Applied Statistics 1982, 31:300-303.
6. De Jong S., Kiers H.A.L. Principal covariates regression: part I. Theory. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1992, 14:155-164.
7. Smilde A.K., Kiers H.A.L. Multiway covariates regression models. Journal of Chemometrics 1999, 13:31-48.
8. S. Gurden, Multiway covariates regression: discussion facilitator (unpublished).
9. Wilderjans T.F., Ceulemans E., Van Mechelen I. Simultaneous analysis of coupled data blocks differing in size: a comparison of two weighting schemes. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2009, 53:1086-1098.
10. Wilderjans T.F., Ceulemans E., Van Mechelen I., van den Berg R.A. Simultaneous analysis of coupled data matrices subject to different amounts of noise. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2011, 64:277-290.
11. Heij C., Groenen P.J.F., Van Dijk D. Forecast comparison of principal component regression and principal covariate regression. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2007, 51:3612-3625.
12. Ceulemans E., Kiers H.A.L. Discriminating between strong and weak structures in three-mode principal component analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 2009, 62:601-620.
13. Tucker L.R., Koopman R.F., Linn R.L. Evaluation of factor analytic research procedures by means of simulated correlation matrices. Psychometrika 1969, 34:421-459.
14. Carroll J.B. An analytical solution for approximating simple structure in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1953, 18:23-38.
15. Yates A. Multivariate exploratory data analysis: a perspective on exploratory factor analysis 1987, SUNY Press, New York.
16. Kaiser H.F. The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika 1958, 23:187-200.
17. Korth B., Tucker L.R. The distribution of chance congruence coefficients from simulated data. Psychometrika 1975, 40:361-372.
18. Cohen J. Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor Anova designs. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1973, 33:107-112.
19. Lorenzo-Seva U., ten Berge J.M.F. Tucker's congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology 2006, 2:57-64.