PlanktoVision - An automated analysis system for the identification of phytoplankton

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 14, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Schulze, Katja ^a,b   Tillich, Ulrich M ^a   Dandekar, Thomas ^b   Frohme, Marcus ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES WILDAU   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED ANALYSIS SYSTEMS; AUTOMATED MICROSCOPY; AUTOMATED RECOGNITION; CLASSIFICATION RESULTS; FLEXIBLE FRAMEWORK; FRESH WATER QUALITY; OPEN SOURCE SYSTEM; PHYTOPLANKTON COMMUNITY;

AUTOMATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; OCEAN HABITATS; PHYTOPLANKTON; PLANKTON; WATER QUALITY;

OPEN SYSTEMS;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CYTOLOGY; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MICROSCOPY; PHYTOPLANKTON;

IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MICROSCOPY; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PHYTOPLANKTON; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84875356178     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-115     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Mischke U, Venohr M, Behrendt H. Using phytoplankton to assess the trophic status of German rivers. Internat Rev Hydrobiol 2011, 96:578-598.
2. European Commission Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. O J Eur Communities 2000, L327:1-73. European Commission.
3. Culverhouse PF, Williams R, Reguera B, Herry V, González-Gil S. Do experts make mistakes? A comparison of human and machine identification of dinoflagellates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2003, 247:17-25.
4. Cellamare M, Rolland A, Jacquet S. Flow cytometry sorting of freshwater phytoplankton. J Appl Phycol 2010, 22:87-100.
5. Dubelaar GBJ, Jonker RR. Flow cytometry as a tool for the study of phytoplankton *. Sci 2000, 64:135-156.
6. Erickson JS, Hashemi N, Sullivan JM, Weidemann AD, Ligler FS. In situ phytoplankton analysis: there's plenty of room at the bottom. Anal Chem 2012, 84:839-850. 10.1021/ac201623k, 21755976.
7. Yan Q, Yu Y. Metagenome-based analysis: a promising direction for plankton ecological studies. Sci China Life Sci 2011, 54:75-81. 10.1007/s11427-010-4103-4, 21104154.
8. Keller A, Wolf M, Dandekar T. Ribosomal RNA phylogenetics: the third dimension. Biologia 2010, 65:388-389.
9. Benfield MC, Grosjean P, Culverhouse PF, Irigoien X, Sieracki ME, Lopez-Urrutia A, Dam HG, Hu Q, Davis CS, Hansen A, Pilskaln CH, Riseman EM, Schultz H, Utgoff PE, Gorsky G. RAPID research on automated Plankton identification. Oceanography 2007, 20:172-187.
10. Rodenacker K, Hense B, Jütting U, Gais P. Automatic analysis of aqueous specimens for phytoplankton structure recognition and population estimation. Microsc Res Tech 2006, 69:708-720. 10.1002/jemt.20338, 16892193.
11. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012, 9:671-675. 10.1038/nmeth.2089, 22930834.
12. Mischke U, Nixdorf B. Praxistest zur Bewertung von Seen anhand des Phytoplanktons gemäß EU-WRRL. Endbericht zum LAWA-Projekt (O 5.05). Gewässerreport (Nr. 10) 2008, 7-115. Cottbus: Eigenverlag BTU.
13. Heaton J. Programming neural networks with Encog 2 in Java 2010, St. Louis: Heaton Research Inc..
14. Hense BA, Gais P, Jütting U, Scherb H, Rodenacker K. Use of fluorescence information for automated phytoplankton investigation by image analysis. J Plankton Res 2008, 30:587-606.
15. Stuurman N, Edelstein AD, Amodaj N, Hoover KH, Vale RD. Computer Control of Microscopes Using μManager. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2010, 92:14.20.1-14.20.17.
16. Wright S, Jeffrey S. Pigment markers for phytoplankton production. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 2006, 71-104. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, Volkman JK, 2.
17. Adams R, Bischof L. Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1994, 16:641-647.
18. Culverhouse PF. Human and machine factors in algae monitoring performance. Ecol Inform 2007, 2:361-366.
19. Du Buf H, Bayer MM. Automatic Diatom Identification 2002, New Jersey: World Scientific Pub Co.
20. Grosjean P, Picheral M, Warembourg C, Gorsky G. Enumeration, measurement, and identification of net zooplankton samples using the ZOOSCAN digital imaging system. ICES J Mar Sci 2004, 61:518-525.
21. Gorsky G, Ohman MD, Picheral M, Gasparini S, Stemmann L, Romagnan JB, Cawood A, Pesant S, Garcia-Comas C, Prejger F. Digital zooplankton image analysis using the ZooScan integrated system. J Plankton Res 2010, 32:285-303.
22. Remsen A, Hopkins TL, Samson S. What you see is not what you catch: a comparison of concurrently collected net, Optical Plankton Counter, and Shadowed Image Particle Profiling Evaluation Recorder data from the northeast Gulf of Mexico. Deep-Sea Res (1 Oceanogr Res Pap) 2004, 51:129-151.
23. Hu Q, Davis C. Automatic plankton image recognition with co-occurrence matrices and support vector machine. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2005, 295:21-31.
24. Culverhouse PF, Simpson RG, Ellis R, Lindley JA, Williams R, Parasini T, Requera B, Bravo I, Zoppoli R, Earnshaw G, McCall H, Smith G. Automatic classification of field-collected dinoflagellates by artificial neural network. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 1996, 139:281-287.
25. Dubelaar GBJ, Casotti R, Tarran GA, Biegala IC. Phytoplankton and their analysis by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry with plant cells 2007, 322. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J.
26. Utermöhl H. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton Methodik. Mitt Int Ver Limnol 1958, 9:1-38.
27. Igathinathane C, Pordesimo LO, Columbus EP, Batchelor WD, Methuku SR. Shape identification and particles size distribution from basic shape parameters using ImageJ. Comput Electron Agr 2008, 63:168-182.
28. Kuhl FP, Giardina CR. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Comput Vis Graph Image Process 1982, 18:236-258.
29. Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein IH. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1997, 3:610-621.
30. Walker RF, Jackway P, Longstaff ID. Improving Co-occurrence Matrix Feature Discrimination. DICTA 3rd Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Application: 6-8 December 1995; Brisbane 1995, 643-648. Brisbane: University of Queensland, Maeder A, Lovell B.
31. Rezakhaniha R, Agianniotis A, Schrauwen TC, Griffa A, Sage C, Bouten VC, van de Vosse FN, Unser M, Stergiopulos N. Experimental investigation of collagen waviness and orientation in the arterial adventitia using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2012, 11:461-473. 10.1007/s10237-011-0325-z, 21744269.
32. Hu MK. Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans Info Theory 1962, 8:179-187.
33. Fischer S, Binkert M, Bunke H. Symmetry based indexing of diatoms in an image database. Int Conf Pattern Recognit 2000, 2:895-898.
34. Ahonen T, Matas J, He C, Pietikäinen M. Rotation invariant image description with local binary pattern histogram fourier features. Image Analysis. Volume 5575 2009, 61-70. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer, Salberg A, Hardeberg J, Jenssen R.
35. Elliott DL. A better Activation Function for Artificial Neural Networks. ISR Technical Report 1993, 8:93-98.
36. Riedmiller M, Braun H. A direct adaptive method for faster backpropagation learning: the RPROP algorithm. IEEE Int Conf Neural Netw 1993, 1:586-591.
37. Igel C, Hüsken M. Improving the Rprop learning algorithm. Proceedings of the second international ICSC symposium on neural computation (NC 2000): 23-26 May 2000; Berlin 2000, 115-121. Genova: ICSC Academic Press, Bothe H, Rojas R.