Branding the City: The Democratic Legitimacy of a New Mode of Governance

Urban Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1066-1082

  Eshuis, Jasper ^a   Edwards, Arthur ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; POLICY APPROACH; REGENERATION; STATE ROLE; URBAN AREA;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84875334934     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098012459581     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arvidsson ABrands: Meaning and Value in Media Culture. London: Routledge; 2006:.
2. Urban Politics Now: Re-imagining Democracy in the Neoliberal City. Rotterdam: NAI Publishers; 2007:.
3. Beetham DThe Legitimation of Power. London: Macmillan; 1991:.
4. Bennett R.,Savani S.The rebranding of city places: an international comparative investigation.International Public Management Review. 2003;4 (2): 70-87.
5. Spaces of Neo-liberalism: Urban Restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Brenner N.Theodore N., ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2002:.
6. Brownill SPlace Promotion: The Use of Publicity and Marketing to Sell Towns and Regions. Gold J. R.Ward S. V., ed. Chichester: Wiley; 1994:133-151.
7. City of Rotterdam (2003) Wonen in Rotterdam: aanpak tot 2006: koers tot 2017 [Housing in Rotterdam: approach to 2006: course to 2017].
8. City of Rotterdam (2006) Collegeprogramma 2006-2010 [Coalition policy programme 2006-2010].
9. Connelly S.Constructing legitimacy in the new community governance.Urban Studies. 2010;47:1-18.
10. Dijk P. van,Holstein A. N.Community Engagement in Planning: Exploring the Way Forward. Amos G.Warburton D., ed. 2007:.
11. Easton DA Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley; 1965:.
12. Edwards A.,Schaap L.Burgerparticipatie in Rotterdam. Rotterdam: Centre for Local Democracy, Erasmus University; 2006:.
13. Eisenhardt K. M.Building theories from case study research.The Academy of Management Review. 1989;14:532-550.
14. Eriksen E. O.,Fossum J. E.Europe in search of legitimacy: strategies of legitimation assessed.International Political Science Review. 2004;25:435-459.
15. Eshuis J.,Klijn E.-H.Branding in Governance and Public Management. London: Routledge; 2012:.
16. Føllesdal A.Survey article: the legitimacy deficits of the European Union.The Journal of Political Philosophy. 2006;14:441-468.
17. Greenberg MBranding New York: How a City in Crisis was Sold to the World. New York: Routledge; 2008:.
18. Hackworth JThe Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 2007:.
19. The Entrepreneurial City: Geographies of Politics, Regime and Representation. Hall T.Hubbard P., ed. Chichester: Wiley; 1998:.
20. Hatch M.,Rubin J.The hermeneutics of branding.Brand Management. 2006;14:40-59.
21. Hendriks F.,Michels A.Democracy transformed? Reforms in Britain and The Netherlands (1990-2010).International Journal of Public Administration. 2011;34 (5): 307-317.
22. Hulst M. van,Graaf L. de,Brink G. van den.Exemplary practitioners: a review of actors who make a difference in governing.Administrative Theory and Praxis. 2011;33 (1): 120-142.
23. Jones P.,Evans J.Urban Regeneration in the UK. London: Sage; 2008:.
24. Kapferer J.-N.Strategic Brand Management: Creating and Sustaining Brand Equity Long Term. London: Kogan Page; 1992:.
25. KavaratzisM. (2008) From city marketing to city branding: an interdisciplinary analysis with reference to Amsterdam, Budapest and Athens. PhD thesis, Groningen University.
26. Kotler P.,Armstrong G.,Saunders J.,Wong V.Principles of Marketing. 1999) Principles of Marketing, 2nd European edn. London: Prentice Hall.London: Prentice Hall; 1999:.
27. Larner W.Neo-liberalism: policy, ideology, governmentality.Studies in Political Economy. 2000;63:5-25.
28. Lees-Marshment J.Mis-marketing the conservatives: the limitations of style over substance.The Political Quarterly. 2004;75:392-397.
29. Lever J.Urban regeneration partnerships: a figurational critique of governmentality theory.Sociology. 2011;45:86-101.
30. Lord C.,Beetham D.Legitimizing the EU: is there a 'postparliamentary basis' for its legitimation?.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2001;39:443-462.
31. Marinetto M.Who wants to be an active citizen? The politics and practice of community involvement.Sociology. 2003;37:103-120.
32. Paddison R.City marketing, image reconstruction and urban regeneration.Urban Studies. 1993;30 (2): 339-350.
33. Przeworski A.,Teune H.The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley; 1970:.
34. Risse T.,Kleine M.Assessing the legitimacy of the EU's treaty revision methods.Journal of Common Market Studies. 2007;45:69-80.
35. Rose N.,Miller P.Political power beyond the state: problematics of government.British Journal of Sociology. 1992;43:173-205.
36. Schaar J. M.Power and Community: Dissenting Essays in Political Science. Green P.Levinson S., ed. New York: Vintage; 1969:276-327.
37. Scharpf F. W.Games Real Actors Play. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997:.
38. Schmitter P. C.What is there to legitimize in the European Union... and how might this be accomplished?. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies; 2001:.
39. Schön D. A.,Rein M.Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books; 1994:.
40. Weber M.Economy and Society. Roth G.Wittich C., ed. New York: Bedminister Press; 1922/1968:.
41. Wolf K. D.Governance and Democracy: Comparing National European and International Experiences. Benz A.Papadopoulos Y., ed. London: Routledge; 2006:200-227.
42. Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1984:.
43. Young C.,Diep M.,Drabble S.Living with difference? The 'cosmopolitan city' and urban reimaging in Manchester, UK.Urban Studies. 2006;43:1687-1714.