How Paradigms Create Politics: The Transformation of American Educational Policy, 1980-2001

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 285-324

  Mehta, Jal ^a  

^a HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

A Nation at Risk; accountability; assessment; No Child Left Behind; paradigm; politics; school reform

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875287358     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831212471417     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Quality control in education.The Baltimore Sun. 1989;:.
2. Baumgartner F.,Jones B.Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1993:.
3. Beland D.Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective.Social Policy and Administration. 2005;39 (1): 1-18.
4. Beland D.,Cox R.Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
5. Bell T.The thirteenth man: A Reagan cabinet memoir. New York, NY: Free Press; 1988:.
6. Berman S.The social democratic moment: Ideas and politics in the making of interwar Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1998:.
7. Berman S.Ideas, norms and culture in political analysis.Comparative Politics. 2001;33 (2): 231-250.
8. Binder A.Constructing racial rhetoric: Media depictions of harm in heavy metal and rap music.American Sociological Review. 1993;58 (6): 753-767.
9. Binder A.For love and money: Organizations' creative responses to multiple environmental logics.Theoretical Sociology. 2007;36:547-571.
10. Blyth M.Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
11. The politics of excellence and choice in education. Boyd W.Kerchner C., ed. New York: Falmer Press; 1988:.
12. Boyd W.,Plank D.,Sykes G.Conflicting missions?: Teachers unions and educational reform. Loveless T., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2000:174-210.
13. Campbell J.Ideas, politics, and public policy.Annual Review of Sociology. 2002;28:21-38.
14. Clemens E.,Cook J.Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change.Annual Review of Sociology. 1999;25:441-466.
15. Cross C.Political education: National policy comes of age. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2004:.
16. Davies S.,Binder A.Importing school forms across societal domains: Frames, hybrids and institutional effects. San Diego, CA: Department of Sociology, University of California; 2007:.
17. DeBray E.Politics, ideology and education: Federal policy during the Clinton and Bush administrations. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2006:.
18. DeBray-Pelot E.,McGuinn P.The new politics of education: Analyzing the federal education policy landscape in the post-NCLB era.Educational Policy. 2009;23 (1): 15-42.
19. Derthick M.,Quirk P.The politics of deregulation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 1985:.
20. Dobbin F.Forging industrial policy: The United States, Britain and France in the railway age. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1994:.
21. Edmonds R.Effective schools for the urban poor.Educational Leadership. 1979;37 (1): 15-27.
22. Elazar D.American federalism: A view from the states. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1984:.
23. Elmore R.School reform from the inside out. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2004:.
24. Accountable schools.The Evening Sun. 1989;:.
25. Firestone W.The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Murphy J., ed. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan; 1990:143-166.
26. Fiske E.Commission on education warns "tide of mediocrity" imperils U.S.New York Times. 1983;:.
27. Fuhrman S.The new accountability. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania; 1999:.
28. From the Capitol to the classroom. Fuhrman S., ed. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education; 2001:.
29. Ginsberg R.,Wimpelberg R.Education changes by commission: Attempting "trickle down reform.".Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 1987;9:344-360.
30. Goldberg M.,Traiman S.Brookings papers on educational policy. Ravitch D., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution; 2001:75-129.
31. Goldstein J.,Keohane R.Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions and political change. Goldstein J.Keohane R., ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1993:.
32. Graham P.,Gordon D.A nation reformed? American education 20 years after A Nation at Risk. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press; 2003:.
33. Grubb W. N.,Lazerson M.The education gospel: The economic power of schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004:.
34. Guthrie J.Minimum competency testing: A brief history.The Reading Teacher. 1981;34 (7): 874-876.
35. Guthrie J.,Springer M.A nation at risk revisited: Did "wrong" reasoning result in "right" results? At what cost?.Peabody Journal of Education. 2004;79 (1): 7-35.
36. Hall P.Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain.Comparative Politics. 1993;29:275-296.
37. Haney J. P.Setting school standards-Utahns looking at ways to hold teachers, students accountable.The Deseret News. 1999;:.
38. Hess F.,McGuinn P.Seeking the mantle of "opportunity": Presidential politics and the educational metaphor, 1964-2000.Educational Policy. 2002;16 (1): 72-95.
39. Jennings J.Why national standards and tests? Politics and the quest for better schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998:.
40. Kapos K.Testing plan irks teachers.The Salt Lake Tribune. 1999;:.
41. King G.,Keohane R.,Verba S.Designing social inquiry: Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994:.
42. Kingdon J.Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown; 1984:.
43. Kirst M.,Wirt F.Schools in conflict. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan; 1982:.
44. Koppich J.A tale of two approaches-The AFT, the NEA, and NCLB.Peabody Journal of Education. 2005;80 (2): 137-155.
45. Kosar K.Failing grades: The federal politics of education standards. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner; 2005:.
46. Kuhn T. S.The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1962:.
47. Lally K.Md. task force proposes public school rating system.The Baltimore Sun. 1989;:.
48. Lamont M.,Molnár V.The study of boundaries in the social sciences.nnual Review of Sociology. 2002;28:167-195.
49. Legro J.The transformation of policy ideas.American Journal of Political Science. 2000;44:419-432.
50. Lieberman R.Ideas, institutions and political order: explaining political change.American Political Science Review. 2002;96 (4): 697-712.
51. Mahoney J.Nominal, ordinal, and narrative appraisal in macrocausal analysis.American Journal of Sociology. 1999;104 (4): 1154-1196.
52. Manna P.Schools in: Federalism and the national education agenda. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2006:.
53. Mawhinney H.,Lugg C.Introduction: Interest groups in United States education.Educational Policy. 2001;15:3-11.
54. Mazzoni T.The study of educational politics. Scribner J.Layton D., ed. Washington, DC: Falmer; 1995:53-73.
55. McDermott K.High stakes reform: The politics of educational accountability. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press; 2011:.
56. McDonnell L.No Child Left Behind and the federal role in education: Evolution or revolution?.Peabody Journal of Education. 2005;80 (2): 19-38.
57. McGuinn P.No Child Left Behind and the transformation of federal education policy, 1965-2005. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas; 2006:.
58. McGuinn P.Conservatism and American political development. Glenn B.Teles S., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
59. Mehta J.How ideas matter: Reframing political research. Beland D.Cox R., ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2010:.
60. Mehta, J. (in press-a). The allure of order: High hopes, dashed expectations and the troubled quest to remake American schooling. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
61. Mehta J.The penetration of technocratic logic into the educational field: Rationalizing schooling from the progressives to the present.Teachers College Record.:.
62. Meier D.In schools we trust: Creating communities of learning in schools in an era of testing and standardization. Boston, MA: Beacon; 2002:.
63. Merwin J.Cut talk, boost funds, teachers says.Baltimore Evening Sun. 1989;:.
64. Meyer J.,Rowan B.Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;83 (2): 340-363.
65. Harden E.,Runkel P.Lansing: The Commission; 1987:.
66. Murphy J.The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan; 1990:.
67. A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: Author; 1983:.
68. Odden A.,Marsh D.The educational reform movement of the 1980s: Perspectives and cases. Murphy J., ed. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan; 1990:167-186.
69. Orren K.,Skowronek S.The search for American political development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
70. Peterson P.,West M.No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2003:.
71. Pierson P.Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences. Mahoney J.Rueschemeyer D., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003:177-198.
72. Putnam H.The collapse of the fact-value dichotomy and other essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2002:.
73. Reed D.On equal terms: The constitutional politics of equal opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2001:.
74. Rieder J.Canarsie: The Jews and Italians of Brooklyn against liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1985:.
75. Roth W.,Mehta J.The Rashomon effect: Combining positivist and interpretivist approaches in the analysis of contested events.Sociological Methods and Research. 2002;31 (2): 131-173.
76. Rowan B.The new institutionalism in education. Meyer H.Rowan B., ed. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2006:.
77. Rowan T.Task force's goal is to aid Utah students.The Deseret News. 1999;:.
78. Rudalevige A.No Child Left Behind? The politics and practice of school accountability. Peterson P.West M., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2003:23-54.
79. Rueschemeyer D.,Skocpol T.States, social knowledge and the origins of modern social policies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1996:.
80. Sabatier P.,Jenkins-Smith H.Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview; 1993:.
81. Schattschneider E. E.Politics, pressure and the tariff. New York, NY: Prentice Hall; 1935:.
82. Schattschneider E. E.The semi-sovereign people: A realist's guide to democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt; 1960:.
83. Schultz T.The economic value of education. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1963:.
84. Sikkink K.Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions and political change. Goldstein J.Keohane R., ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1993:139-170.
85. Skocpol T.States and social revolutions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1979:.
86. Smith M.,O'Day J.The politics of curriculum and testing. Fuhrman S.Malen B., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer; 1991:233-267.
87. Somers M.,Block F.From poverty to perversity: Ideas, markets, and institutions over 200 years of welfare debate.American Sociological Review. 2005;70 (2): 260-287.
88. The need for quality. Atlanta, GA: Author; 1981:.
89. Action goals of Utah State Board of Education. Archival document; 1984:.
90. Steensland B.Cultural categories and the American welfare state: The case of guaranteed income policy.American Journal of Sociology. 2006;111 (5): 1273-1326.
91. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Streeck W.Thelen K., ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005:.
92. Thelen K.How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States and Japan. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004:.
93. Thelen K.,Steinmo S.Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Steinmo S.Thelen K.Longstreth F., ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992:.
94. Thomas C.,Herbenar R.Interest group politics. 1991). Nationalizing of interest groups and lobbying in the states. In CiglerA.LoomisB. (Eds.), Interest group politics (3rd ed., pp. 63-80). Washington, DC: CQ Press.Cigler A.Loomis B., ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press; 1991:63-80.
95. Toch T.In the name of excellence: The struggle to reform the nation's schools, why it's failing, and what should be done. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1991:.
96. Toomer-Cook J.Educators flay standardized tests.The Deseret News. 1999a;:.
97. Toomer-Cook J.Education group talks roles, goals.The Deseret News. 1999b;:.
98. Toomer-Cook J.Schools must do better-or else?.The Deseret News. 1999c;:.
99. Tyack D.,Cuban L.Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1995:.
100. VergariS. (1996). Policy crisis and policy change: Toward a theory of crisis policymaking (PhD dissertation). Lansing: Michigan State University.
101. VinovskisM. (1999). The road to Charlottesville. Retrieved from http://www.negp.gov/reports/negp30.pdf.
102. A new way to judge schools.The Washington Post. 1989;:.
103. Weir M.Politics and jobs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1992:.
104. Wells A. S.NCLB at the crossroads. Rebell M.Wolff J., ed. New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2009:.
105. Yin R. K.Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:.
106. Yu C. M.,Taylor W. L.Title I in midstream: The fight to improve schools for poor kids. Washington, DC: Citizens' Commission on Civil Rights; 1999:.