Receiver psychology: A receiver's perspective

Animal Behaviour

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 517-523

  Rowe, Candy ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animal communication; Multicomponent signal; Signal efficacy; Signalling; Strategic design; Tactical design

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY; COMMUNICATION BEHAVIOR; PSYCHOLOGY; RESEARCH WORK; SIGNAL; SIGNALING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84875276884     PISSN: 00033472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alatalo R.V., Mappes J. Tracking the evolution of warning signals. Nature 1996, 383:708-710.
2. Bierbach D., Grindt A., Hamfler S., Klein M., Mücksch F., Penshorn M., Schwinn M., Zimmer C., Schlupp I., Streit B., et al. Male fish use prior knowledge about rivals to adjust their mate choice. Biology Letters 2011, 7:349-351.
3. Bischof H.-J., Rollenhagen A. Behavioural and neurophysiological aspects of sexual imprinting in zebra finches. Behavioural Brain Research 1999, 98:267-276.
4. Blest A.D. Protective display and sound production in some new world arctiid and ctenuchid moths. Zoologica 1964, 49:161-181.
5. Brooks R. Melanin as a visual amplifier in male guppies. Naturwissenschaften 1996, 83:39-41.
6. Brower J.V.Z. Experimental studies of mimicry. IV. The reactions of starlings to different proportions of models and mimics. American Naturalist 1960, 94:271-282.
7. Carazo P., Font E. Putting information back into animal communication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2010, 23:661-669.
8. Claridge M.F. Stridulation and defensive behaviour in the ground beetle, Cychrus caraboides (L.). Journal of Entomology A 1974, 49:7-15.
9. Carpenter G.D.H. Audible emission of defensive froth by insects. Proceedings of the Zoological Society A 1938, 242-251.
10. Eisner T., Aneshansley D., Eisner M., Rutowski R., Chong B., Meinivald J. Chemical defense and sound production in Australian tenebrionid beetles (Adelium spp.). Psyche 1974, 81:189-208.
11. Endler J.A. Signals, signal conditions and the direction of evolution. American Naturalist 1992, 139:S125-S153.
12. Endler J.A. Some general comments on the evolution and design on animal communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 1993, 340:215-225.
13. Ghirlanda S., Enquist M. A century of generalization. Animal Behaviour 2003, 66:15-36.
14. Gittleman J.L., Harvey P.H. Why are distasteful prey not cryptic?. Nature 1980, 286:149-150.
15. Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1990, 144:517-546.
16. Grant B.R., Grant P.R. Songs of Darwin's finches diverge when a new species enters the community. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A. 2010, 107:20156-20163.
17. Guilford T. Go-slow signaling and the problem of automimicry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1994, 170:311-316.
18. Guilford T., Dawkins M.S. Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals. Animal Behaviour 1991, 42:1-14.
19. Guilford T., Dawkins M.S. Receiver psychology and the design of animal signals. Trends in Neurosciences 1993, 16:430-436.
20. Hauglund K., Snorre H.B., Lampe H. Responses of domestic chicks Gallus gallus domesticus to multimodal aposematic signals. Behavioral Ecology 2006, 17:392-398.
21. Hauser M.D. The Evolution of Communication 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
22. Hebets E.A. Attention-altering interactions among signals in multimodal wolf spider courtship displays. Behavioral Ecology 2005, 16:75-82.
23. Hebets E.A. Current status and future directions of research in complex signaling. Current Zoology 2011, 57:i-v.
24. Hebets E.A., Papaj D.R. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 2005, 57:197-214.
25. Hunter M.L., Krebs J.R. Geographical variation in the song of the great tit (Parus major) in relation to ecological factors. Journal of Animal Ecology 1979, 48:759-785.
26. Kolm N., Amcoff M., Mann R.P., Arnqvist G. Diversification of a food-mimicking male ornament via sensory drive. Current Biology 2012, 22:1440-1443.
27. Kozak G.M., Head M.L., Boughman J.W. Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2011, 278:2604-2610.
28. Krebs J.R., Davies N.B. An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology 1987, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford. 2nd edn.
29. Lynne S.K., Cnaani J., Papaj D.R. Peak shift discrimination learning as a mechanism of signal evolution. Evolution 2005, 59:1300-1305.
30. Maynard Smith J., Harper D. Animal Signals 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. Miller C.T., Bee M.A. Receiver psychology turns 20: is it time for a broader approach?. Animal Behaviour 2012, 83:331-343.
32. Nottebohm F. Continental patterns of song variability in Zonotrichia capensis: some possible ecological correlates. American Naturalist 1975, 109:605-624.
33. Owren M.J., Rendall D., Ryan M.J. Redefining animal signaling: influence versus information in communication. Biological Philosophy 2010, 25:755-780.
34. Partan S., Marler P. Communication goes multimodal. Science 1999, 283:1272-1273.
35. Pearce J.M. Animal Learning and Cognition 1997, Psychology Press, Hove. 2nd edn.
36. Pellis S.M., Pellis V.C. On knowing it's only play: the role of play signals in play fighting. Aggression and Violent Behaviour 1996, 1:249-268.
37. Proctor H.C. Courtship in the water mite Neumania papillator: males capitalize on female adaptations for predation. Animal Behaviour 1991, 42:589-598.
38. Purtle R.B. Peak shift: a review. Psychological Bulletin 1973, 80:408-421.
39. Rebar D., Zuk M., Bailey N.W. Mating experience in field crickets modifies pre- and post-copulatory female choice in parallel. Behavioral Ecology 2011, 22:303-309.
40. Rendall D., Owren M.J., Ryan M.J. What do animal signals mean?. Animal Behaviour 2009, 78:233-240.
41. Ronald K.L., Fernández-Juricic E., Lucas J.R. Taking the sensory approach: how individual differences in sensory perception can influence mate choice. Animal Behaviour 2012, 84:1283-1294.
42. Rothschild M. Defensive odours and Mullerian mimicry among insects. Transactions of the Royal Entomological Society 1961, 113:101-121.
43. Rothschild M., Moore B.P., Brown W.V. Pyrazines as warning odour components in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus, and in moths of the genera Zygaena and Amata (Lepidoptera). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 1984, 23:372-380.
44. Rowland H.M., Ihalainen E., Lindstrom L., Mappes J., Speed M.P. Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences. Nature 2007, 448:64-67.
45. Rowland H.M., Mappes J., Ruxton G.D., Speed M.P. Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry. Ecology Letters 2010, 13:1494-1502.
46. Rowe C. Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals. Animal Behaviour 1999, 58:921-931.
47. Rowe C. Sound improves visual discrimination learning in avian predators. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2002, 269:1353-1357.
48. Rowe C., Guilford T. Hidden colour aversions of domestic chicks triggered by pyrazine odours of insect warning displays. Nature 1996, 383:520-522.
49. Rowe C., Guilford T. The evolution of multimodal warning displays. Evolutionary Ecology 2001, 13:655-671.
50. Rowe C., Lindström L., Lyytinen A. The importance of pattern similarity between Müllerian mimics in predator avoidance learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2004, 271:407-413.
51. Ruxton G.D., Schaefer H.M. Resolving current disagreements and ambiguities in the terminology of animal communication. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2011, 24:2574-2585.
52. Ryan M.J., Fox J.H., Wilczynski W., Rand A.S. Sexual selection for sensory exploitation in the frog Physalaemus pustulosus. Nature 1990, 343:66-67.
53. Scarantino A. Animal communication between information and influence. Animal Behaviour 2010, 79:e1-e5.
54. Scott-Phillips T.C. Animal communication: insights from linguistic pragmatics. Animal Behaviour 2010, 79:e1-e4.
55. Searcy W.A., Nowacki S. The Evolution of Communication: Reliability and Deception in Animal Communication Systems 2005, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
56. Seehausen O., Terai Y., Magalhaes I.S., Carleton K.L., Mrosso H.D.J., Miyagi R., Van Der Sluijs I., Schneidaer M.V., Maan M.E., Tachida H., et al. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish. Nature 2008, 455:620-626.
57. Siddall E.C., Marples N.M. Better to be bimodal: the interaction of color and odor on learning and memory. Behavioral Ecology 2008, 19:425-432.
58. Siddall E.C., Marples N.M. The effect of pyrazine odor on avoidance learning and memory in wild robins Erithacus rubecula. Current Zoology 2011, 57:208-214.
59. Siddall E.C., Marples N.M. Hear no evil: the effect of auditory warning signals on avian innate avoidance, learned avoidance and memory. Current Zoology 2011, 57:197-207.
60. Skelhorn J., Rowe C. Prey palatability influences predator learning and memory. Animal Behaviour 2006, 71:1111-1118.
61. Smith C., Barber I., Wootton R.J., Chittka L. A receiver bias in the origin of three-spined stickleback mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2004, 271:949-955.
62. Speed M.P. Muellerian mimicry and the psychology of predation. Animal Behaviour 1993, 45:571-580.
63. Svensson E.I., Eroukhmanoff F., Karlsson K., Runemark A., Brodin A. A role for learning in population divergence of mate preferences. Evolution 2010, 64:3101-3113.
64. ten Cate C., Rowe C. Biases in signal evolution: learning makes a difference. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2007, 22:380-387.
65. ten Cate C., Verzijden M.N., Etman E. Sexual imprinting can induce sexual preferences for exaggerated parental traits. Current Biology 2006, 16:1128-1132.
66. Tobias J.A., Aben J., Brumfield R.T., Derryberry E.P., Halfwerk W., Slabbekoorn H., Seddon N. Song divergence by sensory drive in Amazonian birds. Evolution 2010, 64:2820-2839.
67. Verzijden M.N., Rosenthal G.C. Effects of sensory modality on learned mate preferences in female swordtail. Animal Behaviour 2011, 82:557-562.
68. Verzijden M.N., Etman E., van Heijningen C., van der Linden M., ten Cate C. Song discrimination learning in zebra finches induces highly divergent responses to novel songs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 2007, 274:295-301.
69. Verzijden M.N., ten Cate C., Servedio M.R., Kozak G.M., Boughman J.W., Svensson E.I. The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2012, 27:511-519.
70. Vos D.R. The role of sexual imprinting for the sex recognition in zebra finches: a difference between males and females. Animal Behaviour 1995, 50:645-653.
71. Weary D.M., Guilford T.C., Weisman R.G. A product of discrimination learning may lead to female preferences for elaborate males. Evolution 1993, 47:333-336.
72. Wiley R.H., Richards D.G. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1978, 3:69-74.
73. Zahavi A. Mate selection: a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1975, 53:205-214.
74. Zahavi A. The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). Journal of Theoretical Biology 1977, 67:603-605.