Interspecific variability of plant stomatal response to step changes of [CO2]

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 88, Issue , 2013, Pages 107-112

  Vodnik, Dominik ^a   Hladnik, JoŽe ^a   VreŠak, Martina ^a   Eler, Klemen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Elevated CO2; Oscillations; Stomatal dynamics

Indexed keywords

C3 PLANT; C4 PLANT; CARBON DIOXIDE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); GRASS; INTERSPECIFIC VARIATION; METABOLISM; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; STEADY-STATE EQUILIBRIUM; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

DIGITARIA (ANGIOSPERM); DIGITARIA SANGUINALIS; ECHINOCHLOA; ECHINOCHLOA CRUS-GALLI; POACEAE;

EID: 84875261645     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.029     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barradas V.L., Jones H.G., Clark J.A. Stomatal responses to changing irradiance in Phaseolus-vulgaris L. J. Exp. Bot. 1994, 45:931-936.
2. Barrs H.D. Cyclic variations in stomatal aperture, transpiration and leaf water potential under constant environmental conditions. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1971, 22:223-236.
3. Bunce J.A. Performance characteristics of an area distributed free air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE) system. Agric. Forest Meteor. 2011, 151:1152-1157.
4. Cardon Z., Mott K.A., Berry J.A. Dynamics of patchy stomatal movements and their contribution to steady-state and oscillating stomatal conductance calculated using gas-exchange techniques. Plant Cell Environ. 1994, 17:995-1007.
5. Cousins A.B., Baroli I., Badger M.R., Ivakov A., Lea P.J., Leegood R.C., von Caemmerer S. The role of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase during C-4 photosynthetic isotope exchange and stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145:1006-1017.
6. Čop J.C., Lavrenčič A., KoŠmelj K. Morphological development and nutritive value of herbage in five temperate grass species during primary growth: analysis of time dynamics. Grass Forage Sci. 2009, 64:122-131.
7. Franks P.J., Farquhar G.D. The mechanical diversity of stomata and its significance in gas-exchange control. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:78-87.
8. Grantz D.A., Assmann S.M. Stomatal response to blue light: water use efficiency in sugarcane and soybean. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14:683-690.
9. Grantz D.A., DA Zeiger E. Stomatal responses to light and leaf-air water vapour pressure differences show similar kinetics in sugarcane and soybean. Plant Physiol. 1986, 81:865-868.
10. 4-cycle intermediates, photorespiration and Rubisco activation. Plant Cell Environ. 1991, 14:881-893.
11. Hendrey G.R., Long S.P., McKee I.F., Baker N.R. Can photosynthesis respond to short-term fluctuations in atmospheric carbon dioxide?. Photosynth. Res. 1997, 51:179-184.
12. Herppich W.B., von Willert D.J. Dynamic changes in leaf bulk water relations during stomatal oscillations in mangrove species. Continuous analysis using a dewpoint hygrometer. Physiol. Plant. 1995, 49:479-485.
13. 2 concentration in maize supplied with different amounts of water. Photosynthetica 2009, 47:422-428.
14. 2. Planta 2003, 218:152-158.
15. 2 concentration: implications for the evolution of stomatal behaviour. Plant Cell Environ. 2003, 26:313-322.
16. Kaiser H., Kappen L. Stomatal oscillations at small apertures: indications for a fundamental insufficiency of stomatal feedback-control inherent in the stomatal turgor mechanism. J. Exp. Bot. 2001, 52:1303-1313.
17. Knapp A.K. Gas-exchange dynamics in C-3 and C-4 grasses-consequences of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology 1993, 74:113-123.
18. Li S., Assmann S.M., Albert R. Predicting essential components of signal transduction networks: a dynamic model of guard cell abscisic acid signaling. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:1732-1748.
19. 2 concentrations other than intercellular. Plant Physiol. 1988, 86:200-203.
20. Motulsky H., Christopoulos A. Fitting Models to Biological Data using Linear and Non-Linear Regression: A Practical Guide to Curve Fitting 2003, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego.
21. Ooba M., Takahashi H. Effect of asymmetrical stomatal response on gas-exchange dynamics. Ecol. Modell. 2003, 164:65-82.
22. Pearcy R.W. Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990, 41:421-453.
23. 2 environment. Prog. Bot. 2004, 65:499-538.
24. R Development Core Team (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.r-project.org/.
25. 2. Plant Physiol. 1972, 49:229-234.
26. Raschke K., Hanebuth W.F., Farquhar G.D. Relationship between stomatal conductance and light intensity in leaves of Zea mays. L. derived from experiments using the mesophyll as shade. Planta 1978, 139:73-77.
27. Scholander P.F., Hemmingsen E.A., Hammel H.T., Bradstreet E.D.P. Hydrostatic pressure and osmotic potential in leaves of mangroves and some other plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 1964, 52(119-125):1964.
28. Schroeder J.I., Allen G.J., Hugouvieux V., Kwak J.M., Waner D. Guard cell signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 2001, 52:627-658.
29. Sharkey T.D., Raschke K. Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiol. 1981, 68:33-40.
30. Tinoco-Ojanguren C., Pearcy R.W. Stomatal dynamics and its importance to carbon gain in two rainforest Piper species. I. VPD effects on the transient stomatal response to lightflecks. Oecologia 1993, 94:388-394.