Legal exclusions, private wealth and livelihoods: An analysis of work time allocation in protected areas

Ecological Economics

Volumn 89, Issue , 2013, Pages 82-91

  Naidu, Sirisha C ^a  

^a WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

India; Protected area; Resource access; Resource dependence; Rural livelihoods; Time allocation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; FOREST RESOURCE; LEGAL SYSTEM; PRIVATE SECTOR; PROTECTED AREA; TIME ALLOCATION; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

HIMALAYAS; INDIA;

EID: 84875252227     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Adhikari B. Poverty, property rights and collective action: understanding the distributive aspects of common property resource management. Environment and Development Economics 2005, 10:7-31.
2. Adhikari B., Di Falco S., Lovett J.C. Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecological Economics 2004, 48:245-257.
3. Agarwal B. A Field of One's Own: Gender and Land Rights in South Asia 1994, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
4. Agarwal B. Gender and Green Governance: The Political Economy of Women's Presence Within and Beyond Community Forest 2010, Oxford University Press, New York.
5. Antonopoulos R., Memis E. Time and poverty from a developing country perspective. Working Paper No. 600 2010, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
6. Bajracharya S.B., Furley P.A., Newton A.C. Effectiveness of community involvement in delivering conservation benefits to the Annapurna Conservation Area, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 2005, 32:239-247.
7. Baland J.M., Platteau J.P. Economics of common property management regimes. Handbook of Environmental Economics 2003, Elsevier, Boston. K.G. Mahler, J. Vincent (Eds.).
8. Bandyopadhyay S., Shyamsundar P., Baccini A. Forests, biomass use and poverty in Malawi. Ecological Economics 2011, 70:2461-2471.
9. Bardasi E., Wodon Q.Q. Measuring time poverty and analyzing its determinants: concepts and application to Guinea. Gender, Time Use and Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa 2006, 75-96. World Bank, Washington D.C. C.M. Blackden, Q. Wodon (Eds.).
10. Bardhan P. Scarcity, Conflicts, and Cooperation: Essays in the Political and Institutional Economics of Development 2005, MIT Press, London.
11. Basole A., Basu D. Relations of production and modes of surplus extraction in India: Part I - agriculture. Economic and Political Weekly 2011, 46:41-58.
12. Beck T., Ghosh M.G. Common property resources and the poor: findings from West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly 2000, 35:147-153.
13. Bertzky B., Corrigan C., Kemsey J., Kenney S., Ravilious C., Besançon C., Burgess N. Protected Planet Report 2012: Tracking Progress Towards Global Targets for Protected Areas 2012, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, UK.
14. Bluffstone R.A. The effect of labor market performance on deforestation in developing countries under open access: an example from rural Nepal. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1995, 29:42-63.
15. Brandon K.E., Wells M. Planning for people and parks: design dilemmas. World Development 1992, 20:557-570.
16. Chambers R. Rural Development: Putting the Last First 1983, Longman, Harlow, Essex.
17. Chhatre A. The mirage of permanent boundaries: politics of forest reservation in the Western Himalayas, 1875-97. Conservation and Society 2003, 1:137-159.
18. Chhatre A., Agrawal A. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106:1766-17670.
19. Chhatre A., Saberwal V.K. Democratizing Nature: Politics, Conservation, and Development in India 2006, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
20. Chhatre A., Saberwal V. Democracy, development and(re-) visions of nature: rural conflicts in the western Himalayas. Journal of Peasant Studies 2006, 33:687-706.
21. Cook D.O., Kieschnick R., McCullough B.D. Regression analysis of proportions in finance with self-selection. Journal of Empirical Finance 2008, 15:860-867.
22. Cooke P. The effect of environmental good scarcity on own-farm labor allocation: the case of agricultural households in rural Nepal. Environment and Development Economics 1998, 3:443-469.
23. Cooke P. Intrahousehold labor allocation responses to environmental good scarcity: a case study from the hills of Nepal. Economic Development and Cultural Change 1998, 46:807-830.
24. Dressler W.H. Co-opting conservation: migrant resource control and access to national park management in the Philippine uplands. Development and Change 2006, 37:401-426.
25. Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories 2008, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. N. Dudley (Ed.).
26. Ellis F. Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries 2000, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
27. Ferrari S.L.P., Cribari-Neto F. Beta regression for modeling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics 2004, 31:799-815.
28. Fisher M. Household welfare and forest dependence in southern Malawi. Environment and Development Economics 2004, 9:135-154.
29. Fisher M., Shively G.E., Buccola S. Activity choice, labor allocation, and forest use in Malawi. Land Economics 2005, 81:503-517.
30. Floro M.S., Miles M. Time use, work and overlapping activities: evidence from Australia. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2003, 27:881-904.
31. Floro M.S., Pichetpongsa A. Gender, work intensity, and well-being of Thai home-based workers. Feminist Economics 2010, 16:5-44.
32. FSI India State of Forest Report 2009 2009, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, Dehradun, India.
33. Gadgil M., Guha R. Ecology and Equity: The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India 1995, Routledge, London.
34. GoHP District Human Development Report: Mandi 2009, Planning Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, India.
35. GoHP Notification No. FFE-B-F-(6) 11/2005 2010, Government of Himachal Pradesh.
36. GoHP Economic Survey of Himachal Pradesh 2009-2010 2011, Economics and Statistics Department, Government of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla, India.
37. GoI Census of India, Series 3: Himachal Pradesh 2001, Director of Census Operations, Himachal Pradesh, Government of India, Shimla.
38. GoI Census of India Series 1: Provisional Population Totals Paper 1 2011, Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India, New Delhi.
39. Guha R. Colonialism and conflict in the Himalayan forest. Social Ecology 1994, 275-302. Oxford University Press, New York. R. Guha (Ed.).
40. Gurung B., Nelson K.C., Smith J.L.D. Impact of grazing restrictions on livestock composition and husbandry practices in Madi Valley, Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 2009, 36:338-347.
41. Hayes T.M. Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas. World Development 2006, 34:2064-2075.
42. Hobley M. Policy, Rights and Local Forest Management: The Case of Himachal Pradesh, India 1992, Overseas Development Institute, London.
43. Ilahi N. The Intra-household Allocation of Time and Tasks: What Have We Learnt from the Empirical Literature 2000, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
44. Ilahi N., Grimard F. Public infrastructure and private costs: water supply and time allocation of women in rural Pakistan. Economic Development and Cultural Change 2000, 49:45-75.
45. Jackson C., Rao N. Gender inequality and agrarian change in liberalizing India. The Gendered Impacts of Liberalization: Towards "Embedded Liberalism"? 2009, 63-98. Routledge, New York. S. Razavi (Ed.).
46. Jodha N.S. Common property resources and the rural poor in dry regions of India. Economic and Political Weekly 1986, 21:1169-1182.
47. Juster F.T., Stafford F.P. The allocation of time: empirical findings, behavioral models, and problems of measurement. Journal of Economic Literature 1991, 29:471-522.
48. Kieschnick R., McCullough B.D. Regression analysis of variates on (0,1): percentages, proportions, and fractions. Statistical Modeling 2003, 3:193-213.
49. Kumar S.K., Hotchkiss D. Consequences of deforestation for women's time allocation, agricultural production, and nutrition in hill areas of Nepal. Research Report, No. 69 1988, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, D.C., (72 pp.).
50. McElwee P.D. Resource use among rural agricultural households near protected areas in Vietnam: the social costs of conservation and implications for enforcement. Environmental Management 2010, 45:113-131.
51. Mearns R. Access to land in rural India: policy and options. Policy Research Working Paper No. 2123 1999, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
52. MoEF The Indian Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972. Amended 1993, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India 1993.
53. MoEF The Wild Life (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002. No. 16 of 2003, Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India 2003.
54. Naidu S.C. Access to benefits from forest commons in the Western Himalayas. Ecological Economics 2011, 71:202-210.
55. Ospina R., Ferrari S.L.P. Inflated beta distributions. Statistical Papers 2010, 51:111-126.
56. Papke L.E., Wooldridge J.M. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1996, 11:619-632.
57. Pattanayak S.K., Sills E.O., Mehta A.D., Kramer R.A. Local uses of parks: uncovering patterns of household production from forests of Siberut, Indonesia. Conservation and Society 2003, 1:209-222.
58. Pattanayak S.K., Sills E.O., Kramer R.A. Seeing the forest for the fuel. Environment and Development Economics 2004, 9:155-179.
59. Rajan R. Imperial environmentalism or environmental imperialism? European forestry, colonial foresters and the agendas of forest management in British India 1800-1900. Nature and the Orient: The Environmental History of South and Southeast Asia 1998, 324-372. Oxford University Press, Delhi. R.H. Grove, V. Damodaran, S. Sangwan (Eds.).
60. Rangan H. Indian environmentalism and the question of the state: problems and prospects for sustainable development. Environment and Planning A 1997, 29:2129-2143.
61. Rangarajan M. Fencing the forest: conservation and ecological change in India's Central Provinces, 1860-1914 1996, Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
62. Reddy S.R.C., Chakravarthy S.P. Forest dependence and income distribution in subsistence economy: evidence from India. World Development 1999, 27:1141-1149.
63. Ribot J.C., Peluso N. A theory of access. Rural Sociology 2003, 68:153-181.
64. Saberwal V.K. Environmental alarm and institutionalized conservation in Himachal Pradesh, 1865-1994. Social Nature: Resources, Representations and Rule in India 2000, 65-85. Oxford University Press, New Delhi. K. Sivaramakrishnan, A. Agrawal (Eds.).
65. Sarin M., Singh N.M., Sundar N., Bhogal R.K. Devolution as a threat to democratic decision-making in forestry? Findings from three states in India. Local Forest Management: The Impacts of Devolution Policies 2003, 55-126. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, Sterling, VA. D. Edmunds, E. Wollenberg (Eds.).
66. Schlager E., Ostrom E. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics 1992, 68:249-262.
67. Sharma H.C. Forest Settlements in Himachal Pradesh. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh 1996, Dehra Dun, India.
68. Springate-Baginski O., Sarin M., Ghosh S., et al. The Indian Forest Rights act 2006: Commoning Enclosures? 2009, Manchester University.
69. Sundar N. Unpacking the 'joint' in joint forest management. Development and Change 2000, 31:255-279.
70. Sundar N., Jeffery R., Thin N. Branching Out: Joint Forest Management in India 2001, Oxford University Press, New York.
71. Takasaki Y., Barham B.L., Coomes O.T. Amazonian peasants, rain forest use, and income generation: the role of wealth and geographical factors. Society and Natural Resources 2001, 14:291-308.
72. Tumusiime D.M., Vedeld P., Gombya-Ssembajjwe W. Breaking the law? Illegal livelihoods from a protected area in Uganda. Forest Policy and Economics 2011, 13:273-283.
73. United Nations Improving Statistics and Indicators on Women Using Household Surveys 1988, United Nations, New York.
74. United Nations Methods of Measuring Women's Participation and Production in the Informal Sector 1990, United Nations, New York.
75. UNSD Guide to Producing Statistics on Time Use: Measuring Paid and Unpaid Work 2005, United Nations Statistical Division, New York.
76. Upadhyay S., Sane A. Conserving Protected Areas and Wildlife: A Judicial Journey 2009, WWF India, New Delhi.
77. Vasan S. Community forestry: historical legacy of Himachal Pradesh. Himalayan Research Bulletin 2003, 21:36-45.
78. Vedeld P., Angelsen A., Sjaastad E., Berg G.K. Counting on the environment: forest incomes and the rural poor. Environmental Economics Series 2004, World Bank, Washington D.C.
79. Vedeld P., Angelsen A., Bojö J., Sjaastad E., Kobugabe Berg G. Forest environmental incomes and the rural poor. Forest Policy and Economics 2007, 9:869-879.
80. Wooldridge J.M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
81. World Bank Unlocking forest opportunities for forest-dependent people in India. Agriculture and Rural Development Sector Unit. Report No. 34481 2006, World Bank, Washington D.C.