Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state of the art review

Safety Science

Volumn 55, Issue , 2013, Pages 207-221

  Hale, Andrew ^a,b   Borys, David ^c  

^a Health and Safety Technology and Management (HASTAM)   (United Kingdom)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BALLARAT   (Australia)

Author keywords

Management of rules; Safety procedures; Safety rules

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT PROCESS; ORGANISATIONAL STUDY; RULE MANAGEMENTS; SAFETY PROCEDURE; SAFETY RULES; STATE-OF-THE ART REVIEWS; TOPDOWN;

SAFETY TESTING;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS; COPING BEHAVIOR; ETHNOGRAPHY; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; RISK REDUCTION; SOCIOLOGY; STANDARD; WORKPLACE;

EID: 84875248070     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011     Document Type: Review

References (162)

1. Åberg L. Traffic rules and traffic safety. Safety Science 1998, 16(1):205-216.
2. Adler P., Goldoftas B., Levine D. Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system. Organization Science 1999, 10(1):43-68.
3. Alper S., Karsh B.-T. A systematic review of safety violations in industry. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2009, 41(4):739-754.
4. Alper, S.J., Holden, R.J., Scanlon, M.C., Kaushal, R., Shalaby, T.M., Karsh, B., 2007. Using the technology acceptance model to predict violations in the medication use process. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors & Ergonomics Society 51st Annual Meeting.
5. Alper, S.J., Holden, R.J., Scanlon, M.C., Patel, N., Murkowski, K., Shalaby, T.M., Karsh, B., 2008a. Violation prevalence after introduction of a bar-coded medication administration system. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Healthcare System Ergonomics and Patient Safety. Strasbourg.
6. Alper, S.J., Scanlon, M.C., Murkowski, K., Patel, N., Kaushal, R., Karsh, B., 2008b. Routine and situational violations during medication administration. In: Sznelwar, L., Mascia, F., Montedo, U. (Eds.), Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management IX.
7. Amalberti R. The paradoxes of almost totally safe transportation systems. Safety Science 2001, 37(2-3):109-126.
8. Amalberti R., Vincent C., Auroy Y., de Saint Maurice G. Violations and migrations in health care: a framework for understanding and management. Quality & Safety in Health Care 2006, 15(Suppl 1):i66-i71.
9. Argyris C., Schön D. Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective 1978, Addison Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
10. Baker E. Predicting response to hurricane warnings: a reanalysis of data from four studies. Mass Emergencies 1979, 4:9-24.
11. Battmann W., Klumb P. Behavioural economics and compliance with safety regulations. Safety Science 1993, 16(1):35-46.
12. Bax E.H., Stejn B.J., De Witte M.C. Risk management at the shop floor: the perception of formal rules in high-risk work situations. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 1998, 6:177-188.
13. Becker M. The concept of routines: some clarifications. Cambridge Journal of Economics 2005, 29(2):249-262.
14. Becker M. A framework for applying organizational routines in empirical research: linking antecedents, characteristics and performance outcomes of recurrent interaction patterns. Industrial and Corporate Change 2005, 14(5):817-846.
15. Becker M., Lazaric N., Nelson R., Winter S. Applying organizational routines in understanding organizational change. Industrial and Corporate Change 2005, 14(5):775-791.
16. Besnard D., Greathead D. A cognitive approach to safe violations. Cognition, Technology and Work 2003, 5(4):272-282.
17. Blackstad H.C., Hovden J., Rosness R. Reverse invention: an inductive bottom-up strategy for safety rule development: a case study of safety rule modifications in the Norwegian railway system. Safety Science 2010, 48(3):382-394.
18. Blakstad, H.C., 2006. Revising rules and reviving knowledge: Adapting hierarchical and risk-based approaches to safety rule modifications in the Norwegian Railway System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim.
19. Borys, D., 2007. Exploring risk awareness as a cultural approach to safety: an ethnographic study of a contract maintenance environment. PhD thesis University of Ballarat. School of Science & Engineering.
20. Borys D. The role of safe work method statements in the Australian construction industry. Safety Science 2012, 50(2):210-220.
21. Bourrier M. Organizing maintenance work at two American nuclear power plants. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 1996, 4(2):104-112.
22. Boyce T.E., Geller E.S. Applied behavior analysis and occupational safety: the challenge of response maintenance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour Management 2001, 21(1):31-60.
23. Brady F. Rules for making exceptions to rules. Academy of Management Review 1987, 12(3):436-444.
24. British Standards Institution, 2008. OHSAS 18002:2008. Occupational health and safety management systems. Guidelines for the implementation of OHSAS 18001:2007. London. BSI.
25. Bruns H. Leveraging functionality in safety routines: examining the divergence of rules and performance. Human Relations 2009, 62(9):1399-1426.
26. CIRAS, 2007. Are rules really made to be broken? The Reporter, Issue 12, 1. (01.02.2007) Confidential Incident Reporting & Analysis System (CIRAS). Rail Safety & Standards Board (RSSB). London.
27. Clarke S. The relationship between safety climate and safety performance. A meta-analytic review. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 2006, 11(4):315-327.
28. Conchie S., Donald I. The functions and development of safety-specific trust and distrust. Safety Science 2008, 46(1):92-103.
29. Corrigan, S., 2002. Comparative analysis of safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance. PhD Thesis. Trinity College, Dublin.
30. De Pasquale J.P., Geller E.S. Critical success factors for behavior-based safety: a study of twenty industry-wide applications. Journal of Safety Research 1999, 30(4):237-249.
31. DEGAS, 2010. Regels als gestolde ervaring (Rules as concentrated (solidified) experience). Dutch Expert Group Aviation Safety. Advice 2010-053. http://www.adviescollege-degas.nl/.
32. DeJoy D.M. Behavior change versus culture change: divergent approaches to managing workplace safety. Safety Science 2005, 43(2):105-129.
33. Dekker S.W.A. Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. Applied Ergonomics 2003, 34(3):233-238.
34. Dekker S.W.A. Ten Questions About Human Error: A New View of Human Factors and System Safety 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey.
35. Diaz-Cabrera D., Hernandez-Fernaud E., Isla-Diaz R. An evaluation of a new instrument to measure organisational safety culture values and practices. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2007, 39(6):1202-1211.
36. Dien Y. Safety and application of procedures, or 'how do 'they' have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants?'. Safety Science 1998, 29(3):179-188.
37. Drach-Zahavy A., Somech A. Implicit as compared with explicit safety procedures & the experience of Israeli nurses. Qualitative Health Research 2010, 20(10):1406-1417.
38. Elling, M.G.M., 1991. Veiligheidsvoorschriften in de industrie (Safety rules in industry). PhD Thesis. University of Twente. Faculty of Philosophy and Social Sciences Publication WMW No. 8. Netherlands.
39. Embrey, D., 1999. Preventing human error:developing a best practice safety culture. In: Paper to the Berkeley Conference International conference Achieving a step change in safety performance. Barbican Centre, London, February.
40. Energy Institute, 2008. Managing rule breaking: the toolkit. http://www.energyinst.org.uk/heartsandminds.
41. Farrington-Darby T., Pickup L., Wilson J. Safety culture in railway maintenance. Safety Science 2005, 43(1):39-60.
42. Feldman M., Pentland B. Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly 2003, 48(2003):94-118.
43. Fishbein M., Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research 1975, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.
44. Fleury D. Reinforcing the rules or integrating behavioural responses into road planning. Safety Science 1998, 16(1):217-228.
45. Flin R., Mearns K., O'Connor P., Bryden R. Measuring safety climate: identifying the common features. Safety Science 2000, 34(1-3):177-192.
46. Free, R., 1994. The role of procedural violations in railway accidents. PhD thesis. University of Manchester.
47. Fucks, I., Dien, Y., 2010. "No rule, no use" ? The effects of overproceduralization. In: Paper to the 27th New Technology and Work Workshop on How desirable or avoidable is proceduralization of safety?. Sorèze, France.
48. Gawande A. The Checklist Manifesto: How to do Things Right 2010, Profile Books, London.
49. Geller, E.S., 1998. Understanding Behaviour-based Safety: Step by Step Methods to Improve your Workplace, second ed. Neenah Wisconsin. J.J. Keller & Associates.
50. Gherardi S., Nicolini D. To transfer is to transform: the circulation of safety knowledge. Organization 2000, 7(2):329-348.
51. Gouldner A.W. Patterns of Industrial Democracy 1955, Routledge, London.
52. Groeneweg J. Controlling the Controllable: The Management of Safety 1998, DSWO Press, Leiden. forth ed.
53. Grote, G., 2006. Rules management as source for loose coupling in high-risk systems. In: Second Resilience Engineering Symposium. Juan les Pins, France.
54. Grote, G., 2010. Why regulators should stay away from regulating safety culture. In: Paper to the 27th New Technology and Work Workshop on How Desirable or Avoidable is Proceduralization of Safety?. Sorèze, France.
55. Grote G., Weichbrodt J., Gunter H., Zala-Mezo E., Kunzle B. Coordination in high-risk organizations: the need for flexible routines. Cognition, Technology & Work 2009, 11(1):17-27.
56. Guldenmund F. The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research. Safety Science 2000, 34(1-3):215-257.
57. Hale, A.R., Borys, D., Adams, M., 2011. Regulatory overload: a behavioral analysis of regulatory compliance. Working paper no. 11-47. Mercatus Center, George Mason University, Arlington, Virginia.
58. Hale, A.R., Borys, D., this issue. Working to rule or working safely? Part 2: The management of safety rules and procedures. Safety Science.
59. Hale, A.R., Guldenmund, F.G., 2004. Aramis Audit Manual. Safety Science Group, Delft University of Technology. Version 1.3.
60. Hale A., Swuste P. Safety rules: procedural freedom or action constraint. Safety Science 1998, 29(3):163-177.
61. Hale, A., Heijer, T., Koornneef, F., 2003. Management of safety rules: The case of railways [Electronic version]. Safety Science Monitor 7 (1), III-2.
62. Hale A.R., Goossens L.H.J., Ale B.J.M., Bellamy L.A., Post J., Oh J.I.H., Papazoglou I.A. Managing safety barriers and controls at the workplace. Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management 2004, 608-613. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
63. Hale A.R., Guldenmund F.W., van Loenhout P.L.C.H., Oh J.I.H. Evaluating safety management and culture interventions to improve safety: effective intervention strategies. Safety Science 2010, 48(8):1026-1035.
64. Hale, A.R., Jacobs, J., Oor, M., 2010b. Safety culture change in two companies. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management. Seattle. Washington.
65. HFRG, 1995. Improving compliance with safety procedures: reducing industrial violations. Human Factors in Reliability Group. Published by Health & Safety Executive. HMSO London.
66. Hofmann D., Morgeson F. Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: the role of perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology 1999, 84(2):286-296.
67. Hollnagel E. Barriers and Accident Prevention 2004, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot.
68. Resilience Engineering: Concepts & Precepts 2006, Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot. E. Hollnagel, D.D. Woods, N. Leveson (Eds.).
69. Hopkins A. Lessons from Gretley: Mindful Leadership and the Law 2007, CCH Australia, Sydney.
70. Hopkins, A., 2010. Risk management and rule compliance decision making in hazardous industries (Working Paper 72). National Research Centre for OHS Regulation, Canberra.
71. Howell, G., Ballard, G., Abdelhamid, T., Mitropoulos, P., 2002. Working near the edge: a new approach to construction safety. In: Proceedings IGLC-10, August 2002, Gramado, Brazil.
72. Høyland, S., Aase, K., Hollund, J.G., Haugen, A., 2010. What is it about checklists? Exploring safe work practices in surgical teams. In:Paper to the 27th New Technology and Work Workshop on How desirable or avoidable is proceduralization of safety? Sorèze, France.
73. Hudson, P., Parker, D., Lawton, R., van der Graaf, G., 2000. Bending the rules: Managing violation in the workplace. In: International Conference of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. (retrieved 04.04.10). http://www.energyinst.org.uk/heartsandminds/docs/bending.pdf.
74. Hudson, P., van der Graaf, G.C., Bryden, R., undated. The rule of three: situation awareness in hazardous situations.
75. ILCI (International Loss Control Institute), 1990. International Safety Rating System (ISRS). Loganville, Georgia. ILCI.
76. Iszatt-White M. Catching them at it: an ethnography of rule violation. Ethnography 2007, 8(4):445-465.
77. Jeffcott S., Pidgeon N., Weyman A., Walls J. Risk, trust, and safety culture in UK train operating companies. Risk Analysis 2006, 26(5):1105-1121.
78. Karasek R.A. Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly 1979, 24:285-308.
79. Katz-Navon T., Naveh E., Stern Z. Safety climate in health care organizations: a multidimensional approach. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 84(6):1075-1089.
80. Keil Centre, 2002. Strategies to promote safe behaviour as a part of a health and safety management system. Contract Research Report 430/2002. Health & Safety Executive. Sheffield.
81. Knudsen F. Paperwork at the service of safety? Workers' reluctance against written procedures exemplified by the concept of 'seamanship'. Safety Science 2009, 47(2):285-303.
82. Komaki J., Barwick K., Scott L. A behavioral approach to occupational safety: pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant. Journal of Applied Psychology 1978, 63(4):434-445.
83. Komaki J., Heinzmann A., Lawson L. Effect of training and feedback: component analysis of a behavioral safety program. Journal of Applied Psychology 1980, 65(3):261-270.
84. Kramer R. Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology 1999, 50(1999):569-598.
85. Krause T.R., Seymour K.J., Sloat K.C.M. Long-term evaluation of a behavior-based method for improving safety performance. A meta-analysis of 73 interrupted time-series replications. Safety Science 1999, 32(1):1-18.
86. Kringen, J., 2010. Negotiating legal standards in risk regulation: Protective claims and accountability. In: Paper to the 27th New Technology and Work Workshop on How desirable or avoidable is proceduralization of safety? Sorèze, Toulouse. FonCSI.
87. Labour Inspectorate, 1989. Procedures in the Process Industry: examples and proposals concerning development, introduction and control of procedures in the process industry. Directorate-General of Labour. Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. Voorburg NL.
88. Laitinen, H., Ruohomäki, I., 1996. The effects of feedback and goal setting on safety performance at two construction sites references and further reading may be available for this article. To view references and further reading you must purchase this article. Safety Science 24(1), 64-73.
89. Lamvik G.M., Naesje P.C., Skarholt K., Torvatn H. Paperwork, management and safety: towards a bureaucratization of working life and a lack of hands-on supervision. Safety, Reliability and Risk Analysis. Theory, Methods and Applications 2009, Taylor & Francis, London. S. Martorell, C. Guedes Soares, J. Barnett (Eds.).
90. Larsen, L.D., Petersen, K., Hale, A.R., Heijer, H., Parker, D., Lawrie, D., 2004. A framework for safety rule management. contract no:GMA2/2001/52053. Danish Traffic Institute, Lyngby.
91. Laurence D. Safety rules and regulations on mine sites - the problem and a solution. Journal of Safety Research 2005, 36(1):39-50.
92. Lawton R. Not working to rule: understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Science 1998, 28(2):77-96.
93. LeCoze, J.-C., Wiig, S., 2010. Beyond procedures: can safety culture be regulated? In: Paper to the 27th New Technology and Work Workshop on How Desirable or Avoidable is Proceduralization of Safety? Sorèze. Toulouse. FonCSI.
94. Leplat J. About implementation of safety rules. Safety Science 1998, 16(1):189-204.
95. Levinthal D., Rerup C. Crossing an apparent chasm: bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science 2006, 17(4):502-513.
96. Loukopoulou, L., 2008. Pilot error: even skilled experts make mistakes. Paper presented at WorkingonSafety.Net, In: 4th Annual Conference. Prevention of Occupational Accident in a Changing Work Environment. Crete, Greece, 30th September-3rd October.
97. Maidment, D., 1993. A changing safety culture on British Rail. In: Paper to the 11th NeTWork Workshop on 'The use of rules to achieve safety'. Bad Homburg 6-8 May.
98. March J., Simon H. Organizations 1958, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
99. Marchand A., Simard M., Carpentier-Roy M.-C., Ouellet F. From a unidimensional to a bidimensional concept and measurement of workers' safety behaviour. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health 1998, 24(4):293-299.
100. Martin L. Bending the rules or fudging the paperwork? Documenting learning in SMEs. Journal of Workplace Learning 2001, 13(5):189-197.
101. Mascini P. The blameworthiness of health and safety rule violations. Law & Policy 2005, 27(3):472-490.
102. Mascini, P., Bacharias, Y., 2008. Formal and informal risk handling strategies: the importance of ethnographic research for safety surveys. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Working on Safety Network Conference, Crete.
103. McAfee R.B., Win A.R. The use of incentives/feedback to enhance workplace safety: a critique of the literature. Journal of Safety Research 1989, 20:7-19.
104. McCarthy J., Wright P., Monk A., Watts L. Concerns at work: designing useful procedures. Human-Computer Interaction 1998, 13(4):433-457.
105. McDonald N., Corrigan S., Daly C., Cromie S. Safety management systems and safety culture in aircraft maintenance organisations. Safety Science 2000, 34(1-3):151-176.
106. McDonald R., Waring J., Harrison S., Walshe K., Boaden R. Rules and guidelines in clinical practice. A qualitative study in operating theatres of doctors' and nurses' views. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2005, 14:290-294.
107. McDonald R., Waring J., Harrison S. Rules, safety and the narrativisation of identity: a hospital operating theatre case study. Sociology of Health & Illness 2006, 28(2):178-202.
108. Mohamed S. Safety climate in construction site environments. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2002, 128(5):375-384.
109. Mohamed S. Scorecard approach to benchmarking organizational safety culture in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 2003, 129(1):80-88.
110. Nathanael, D., Marmaras, N., 2006. The interplay between work practices and prescription: a key issue for organizational resilience. In: Paper presented at the 2nd Symposium on Resilience Engineering, Juan-les-Pins, France, November 8-10.
111. Nathanael D., Marmaras N. On the development of work practices: a constructivist model. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 2008, (9):359-382.
112. Ng I., Dastmalchian A. Organizational flexibility in Canada: a study of control and safeguard rules. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 1998, 9(3):445-456.
113. Norros, L., 1993. Procedural factors in individual and organisational performance. In: Paper to the 11th NeTWork Workshop on 'The use of rules to achieve safety'. Bad Homburg 6-8 May. VTT Espoo, Finland.
114. O'Dea A., Flin R. Site managers and safety leadership in the offshore oil and gas industry. Safety Science 2001, 37(1):39-57.
115. O'Toole M. The relationship between employees' perceptions of safety and organizational culture. Journal of Safety Research 2002, 33(2):231-243.
116. Otsuka Y., Misawa R., Noguchi H., Yamaguchi H. A consideration for using workers' heuristics to improve safety rules based on relationships between creative mental sets and rule-violating actions. Safety Science 2010, 48:878-884.
117. Parker D., Lawton R. Judging the use of clinical protocols by fellow professionals. Social Science & Medicine 2000, 51(5):669-677.
118. Parker, D., Malone, C., 2004. Influencing driver attitudes and behaviour. In: SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and, Production, 29-31 March 2004.
119. Parker D., Lawrie M., Hudson P. A framework for understanding the development of organisational safety culture. Safety Science 2006, 44(2006):551-562.
120. Perrin, C., 1993. The dynamics of safety: the intersection of technical, cultural and social regulative systems in the operation of high hazard technologies. In: Paper to the 11th NeTWork Workshop on 'The use of rules to achieve safety'. Bad Homburg 6-8 May. MIT, Sloan School of Management.
121. Peters, R., 1999. The challenge of enforcing safety rules in remote hazardous work areas. In: Paper presented at Work, Stress, and Health '99: Organization of Work in a Global Economy Conference, Baltimore, March 13.
122. Pidgeon N. Safety culture and risk management in organizations. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 1991, 22(1):129-140.
123. Polet P., Vanderhaegen F., Wieringa P. Theory of safety-related violations of system barriers. Cognition, Technology & Work 2002, 4:171-179.
124. Polet P., Vanderhaegen F., Amalberti R. Modelling borderline tolerated conditions of use (BTCU) and associated risks. Safety Science 2003, 41(2-3):111-136.
125. Power M. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification 1997, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
126. Prussia G.E., Brown K.A., Willis P. Mental models of safety: do managers and employees see eye to eye?. Journal of Safety Research 2003, 34:143-156.
127. Ranney J., Nelson C. Impacts of participatory safety rules revision in US railroad industry. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2004, 1899:156-163.
128. Rasmussen J. Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Safety Science 1997, 27(2/3):183-213.
129. Rayner S. Management of radiation hazards in hospitals: plural rationalities in a single institution. Social Studies of Science 1986, 16(1986):573-591.
130. Reason J.T. Human Error 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
131. Reason J.T. Managing the Risks of Organisational Accidents 1997, Ashgate, Aldershot.
132. Reason J. The Human Contribution 2008, Ashgate, Aldershot.
133. Reason J., Parker D., Lawton R. Organizational controls and safety: the varieties of rule-related behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 1998, 71:289-304.
134. Reynaud B. Types of rules, interpretation and collective dynamics: reflections on the introduction of a salary rule in a maintenance workshop. Industrial and Corporate Change 1996, 5(3):699-721.
135. Reynaud, B., 2005. Void at the heart of rules: routines in the context of rule following. The case of the Paris Metro Workshop. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(5), 847-871.
136. Schelling T. Enforcing rules on oneself. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1985, 1(2):357-374.
137. Schöbel M. Trust in high-reliability organizations. Social Science Information 2009, 48(2):315-333.
138. Schulz M. Limits to bureaucratic growth: the density dependence of organizational rule births. Administrative Science Quarterly 1998, 43:845-876.
139. Schulz M. Impermanent institutionalization: the duration dependence of organizational rule changes. Industrial and Corporate Change 2003, 12(5):1077-1098.
140. Shaw, A., Blewett, V., Stiller, L., Cox, S., Ferguson, S., Frick, K., Aickin, C., 2007. Digging Deeper. Report by Shaw Idea commissioned by NSW Mine Safety Advisory Council.
141. Shell, 2009. Guidance for employee and (sub) contractor front-line staff. Version 2. (12. Life-saving rules). Shell, The Hague.
142. Simard M., Marchand A. Workgroup's propensity to comply with safety rules: the influence of micro-macro organisational factors. Ergonomics 1997, 40(2):172-188.
143. Snook S.A. Friendly Fire: The Accidental Shootdown of US Black Hawks over Northern Iraq 2002, Princeton University Press.
144. Snyder L.A., Krauss A.D., Chen P.Y., Finlinson S., Huang Y.-H. Occupational safety: application of the job demand-control-support model. Accident Analysis and Prevention 2008, 40:1713-1723.
145. Sundström-Frisk C. Understanding human behaviour: a necessity in improving safety and health performance. Journal of Occupational Health & Safety - Australia & New Zealand 1998, 15(1):37-45.
146. Taylor F.W. The Principles of Scientific Management 1911, Harper & Brothers.
147. Thackaberry J. "Discursive opening" and closing in organizational self-study: culture as trap and tool in wildland firefighting safety. Management Communication Quarterly 2004, 17(3):319-359.
148. Theodoulides A. 'I would never personally tell anyone to break the rules, but you can bend them': teaching moral values through team games. European Journal of Physical Education 2003, 8(2):141-159.
149. Törner M., Pousette A. Safety in construction - a comprehensive description of the characteristics of high safety standards in construction work, from the combined perspective of supervisors and experienced workers. Journal of Safety Research 2009, 40:399-409.
150. Torp S., Grøgaard Jens.B. The influence of individual and contextual work factors on workers' compliance with health and safety routines. Applied Ergonomics 2009, 40:185-193.
151. Van den Top, J., 2010. Modelling risk control measures in railways: analysing how designers and operators organise safe rail traffic. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology. Safety Science Group.
152. Van der Doef M., Maes S. The job-demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: a review of 20 years of empirical research. Work Stress 1999, 13:87-114.
153. Vaughan D. The Challenger Launch Decision: Risk Technology, Culture and Deviance at NASA 1996, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
154. Waszink A.C., Meyer F.O., van der Pelt A.C.W. Integratie van zorgsystemen (Integation of management systems). Sigma 1995, 1:4-7.
155. Weick K.E. The collapse of sense making in organizations: the Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 1993, 38:628-652.
156. Weick K.E. Drop your tools: an allegory for organizational studies. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996, 41:301-313.
157. Wilson, N.A., 2004. Improving Compliance with Permanent Attachment Safety Procedures in the Overhead Transmission Industry: Reducing the Potential for Violations. MSc Thesis in Risk Management & Safety Technology, University of Aston in Birmingham.
158. Woods D.D., Shattuck L.G. Distant supervision - local action given the potential for surprise. Cognition, Technology & Work 2000, 2:242-245.
159. Wright P., McCarthy J. Analysis of procedure following as concerned work. Handbook of Cognitive Task Design 2003, 679-700. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. E. Hollnagel (Ed.).
160. Wright, P., Pocock, S., Fields, R.E., 1998. The prescription and practice of work on the flight deck. In: Green, T.R.G., Bannon, L., Warren, C.P., Buckley, J. (Eds.), Cognition and Cooperation: Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (ECCE9). EACE Press, pp. 37-42.
161. Zeitlin L.R. Failure to follow safety instructions: faulty communication or risky decision?. Human Factors 1994, 36(1):172-181.
162. Zoller H. Health on the line: identity and disciplinary control in employee occupational health and safety discourse. Journal of Applied Communication Research 2003, 31(2):118-139.