Fuel electricity and plug-in electric vehicles in a low carbon fuel standard

Energy Policy

Volumn 56, Issue , 2013, Pages 51-62

  Yang, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Greenhouse gases; Incentives; Policy

Indexed keywords

ALLOCATION METHODS; CHARGING INFRASTRUCTURES; ELECTRICITY DEMANDS; INCENTIVES; PLUG-IN ELECTRIC VEHICLES; POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS; REGULATORY DECISIONS; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION;

ALTERNATIVE FUELS; CARBON; ELECTRIC VEHICLES; GREENHOUSE GASES; PUBLIC POLICY;

ELECTRICITY;

ALTERNATIVE FUEL; ELECTRIC VEHICLE; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY POLICY; FUEL CONSUMPTION; GREENHOUSE GAS; INCENTIVE;

EID: 84875222608     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Alvarado, A., Griffin, K., 2007. Revised Methodology to Estimate The Generation Resource Mix of California Electricity Imports: Staff Paper. CEC-700-2007-007, California Energy Commission.
2. Andress D., Dean Nguyen T., et al. Low-carbon fuel standard-status and analytic issues. Energy Policy 2010, 38(1):580-591.
3. Axsen J., Kurani K.S., et al. Plug-in hybrid vehicle GHG impacts in California: integrating consumer-informed recharge profiles with an electricity-dispatch model. Energy Policy 2011, 39(3):1617-1629.
4. Burke, A., Zhao, H., et al., 2011. Comparing Fuel Economies and Costs of Advanced vs. Conventional Vehicles. Sustainable Transportation Energy Pathways A Research Summary for Decision Makers. J. Ogden and L. Anderson. Davis, California, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
5. CARB Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard: Volume I-Initial Statement of Reasons 2009, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
6. CARB Proposed Regulation to Implement the Low Carbon Fuel Standard: Volume II-Appendices 2009, California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
7. CARB Attachment B: 2050 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis: Staff Modeling in Support of the Zero Emission Vehicle Regulation 2009, California Air Resourcs Board.
8. CPUC, 2009. Light-Duty Vehicle Electrification In California: Potential Barriers And Opportunities: Staff White Paper, California Public Utilities Commission.
9. CPUC, 2010. CPUC Addresses Regulatory Authority To Create Vibrant Market For Electric Vehicle Charging.
10. Curran M.A., Mann M., et al. The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production 2005, 13:853-862.
11. DOE, 2012. Federal and State Incentives and Laws. 〈〉, US Department of Energy, Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicles Data Center. http://www.afdc.energy.gov/afdc/laws/matrix/tech.
12. EIA, 2010. Annual Energy Outlook, United States Department of Energy.
13. EIA, 2011. Form EIA-923 Data-Electric Power Plant Data, Energy Information Agency, US Department of Energy.
14. EPA, 2007. Emissions & Generation Resource Integrated Database (eGRID), Environmental Protection Agency.
15. EPRI and NRDC, 2007. Environmental Assessment of Plug-In Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Volume 1: Nationwide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Electric Power Research Institute and National Resources Defence Council.
16. Farrell A.E., Sperling D. A Low-Carbon Fuel Standard for California, Part 1: Technical Analysis 2007, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
17. Gallagher K.S., Muehlegger E. Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2011, 61(1):1-15.
18. Greene D. How Consumers Value Fuel Economy: A Literature Review 2010, United States Environmental Protection Agency.
19. Hadley S.W., Tsvetkova A. Potential Impacts of Plug-in Hybrid Electrif Vehicles on Regional Power Generation 2008, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
20. IEA Energy Technology Perspectives 2010: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050 2010, International Energy Agency, Paris.
21. Jiusto S. The differences that methods make: cross-border power fl{ligature}ows and accounting for carbon emissions from electricity use. Energy Policy 2006, 34:2915-2928.
22. Kahl, E., T. Lindl, 2009. Request for Party Status and Opening Brief of Western States Petroleum Association to California Public Utilities Commission. Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Own Motion to Consider Alternative-Fueled Vehicle Tariffs, Infrastructure and Policies to Support California's Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Goals, Rulemaking 09-08-009.
23. Kromer M.A., Heywood J.B. Electric Powertrains: Opportunities and Challenges in the US Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet 2007, S. A. Laboratory, Cambridge, MA, MIT, 153p.
24. Leighty W. Modeling transitions in the California light-duty vehicles sector to achieve deep reductions in transportation greenhouse gas emissions. Energy Policy 2012, 44:52-67.
25. Lowenthal, R., Qunn, C., 2009). Brief of Coulomb Technologies, Inc to California Public Utilities Commission. Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Own Motion to Consider Alternative-Fueled Vehicle Tariffs, Infrastructure and Policies to Support California's Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Goals, Rulemaking 09-08-009.
26. Lutsey, N., 2011. Personal Communication: EER calculations for Nissan Leaf and Chevy Volt.
27. McCarthy, R., Turrentine, T.S., et al., 2010. Taking Charge: Establishing California Leadership in the Plug-in Electric Vehicle Marketplace, California Plug-in Electric Vehicle Collaborative.
28. McCarthy R., Yang C. Determining marginal electricity for near-term plug-in and fuel cell vehicle demands in California: impacts on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Power Sources 2010, 195:2099-2109.
29. NESCAUM Introducing a Low Carbon Fuel Standard in the Northeast 2009, Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management, Boston, MA.
30. NRC Transitions to Alternative Transportation Technologies-Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles 2009, National Research Council of the National Academies.
31. ORDEQ Oregon Draft Low Carbon Fuel Standards: Advisory Committee Process and Program Design 2010, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Portland, OR.
32. Plotkin S., Singh M. Multi-Path Transportation Futures Study: Vehicle Characterization and Scenario Analyses 2009, Argonne National Laboratory, Energy Systems Division.
33. Samaras C., Meisterling K. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. Environmental Science and Technology 2008, 42:3170-3176.
34. Sperling D., Yeh S. Toward a global low carbon fuel standard. Transport Policy 2010, 17(1):47-49.
35. Suetake, N., 2009. Reply Comments of The Utility Reform Network (TURN) to California Public Utilities Commission. Order Instituting Rulemaking on the Commission's Own Motion to Consider Alternative-Fueled Vehicle Tariffs, Infrastructure and Policies to Support California's Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Goals, Rulemaking 09-08-009.
36. TIAX, 2011. A Low Carbon Fuel Standard in Washington: Informing the Decision. Jennifer Pont and Jeff Rosenfeld. Lacey, Washington, Final Report for State of Washington, Department of Ecology.
37. Wang M. Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) Model 2010, Argonne National Laboratory.
38. Weber C.L., Jaramillo P., et al. Life cycle assessment and grid electricity: what do we know and what can we know?. Environmental Science and Technology 2010, 44(6):1895-1901.
39. Yang C., McCollum D., et al. Meeting an 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from transportation by 2050: a case study in California, USA. Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment 2009, 14:147-156.