A retrospective contralateral study comparing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with penetrating keratoplasty

Cornea

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 385-389

  Kim, Myung Hun ^a   Chung, Tae Young ^a   Chung, Eui Sang ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

contralateral study 2012 by; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; penetrating keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ANTIGLAUCOMA AGENT; STEROID;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASTIGMATISM; CELL DENSITY; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA PERFORATION; CORNEA THICKNESS; DEEP ANTERIOR LAMELLAR KERATOPLASTY; DESCEMET MEMBRANE; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE ABNORMALITY; KERATOPLASTY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SCHOOL CHILD; SOUTH KOREA; VISUAL ACUITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CORNEAL DISEASES; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOPLASTY, PENETRATING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VISUAL ACUITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875216818     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e318254be4e     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. The Australian Corneal Graft Registry. 1990 to 1992 report. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1993; 21(2 suppl):1-48.
2. Javadi MA, Motlagh BF, Jafarinasab MR, et al. Outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Cornea. 2005; 24:941-946.
3. Muraine M, Toubeau D, Gueudry J, et al. Impact of new lamellar techniques of keratoplasty on eye bank activity. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007; 245:32-38.
4. Beckingsale P, Mavrikakis I, Al-Yousuf N, et al. Penetrating keratoplasty: outcomes from a corneal unit compared to national data. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90:728-731.
5. Thompson RW Jr, Price MO, Bowers PJ, et al. Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2003; 110:1396-1402.
6. Patel SV, Hodge DO, Bourne WM. Corneal endothelium and postoperative outcomes 15 years after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 139:311-319.
7. Terry MA. The evolution of lamellar grafting techniques over twenty-five years. Cornea. 2000; 19:611-616.
8. Morris E, Kirwan JF, Sujatha S, et al. Corneal endothelial specular microscopy following deep lamellar keratoplasty with lyophilised tissue. Eye (Lond). 1998; 12(pt 4):619-622.
9. Funnell CL, Ball J, Noble BA. Comparative cohort study of the outcomes of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus. Eye (Lond). 2006; 20:527-532.
10. Panda A, Bageshwar LM, Ray M, et al. Deep lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty for corneal lesions. Cornea. 1999; 18: 172-175.
11. Shimazaki J, Shimmura S, Ishioka M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of deep lamellar keratoplasty vs penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2002; 134:159-165.
12. Watson SL, Ramsay A, Dart JK, et al. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in patients with keratoconus. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111:1676-1682.
13. Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet's membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28:398-403.
14. Fogla R, Padmanabhan P. Results of deep lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 141:254-259.
15. Fontana L, Parente G, Tassinari G. Clinical outcomes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the big-bubble technique in patients with keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143:117-124.
16. Vajpayee RB, Tyagi J, Sharma N, et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty by big-bubble technique for treatment corneal stromal opacities. Am J Ophthalmol. 2007; 143:954-957.
17. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Srinivasan S, et al. Comparison of three different techniques of corneal transplantation for keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008; 146:905-912.e1.
18. Borderie VM, Werthel AL, Touzeau O, et al. Comparison of techniques used for removing the recipient stroma in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008; 126:31-37.
19. Shimazaki J. The evolution of lamellar keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2000; 11:217-223.
20. Krumeich JH, Knulle A, Krumeich BM. Deep anterior lamellar (DALK) vs. penetrating keratoplasty (PKP): a clinical and statistical analysis [in Spanish]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2008; 225:637-648.
21. Trimarchi F, Poppi E, Klersy C, et al. Deep lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmologica. 2001; 215:389-393.
22. Cheng YY, Visser N, Schouten JS, et al. Endothelial cell loss and visual outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty: a randomized multicenter clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118:302-309.
23. Han DC, Mehta JS, Por YM, et al. Comparison of outcomes of lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty in keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009; 148:744-751.e1.
24. Kawashima M, Kawakita T, Den S, et al. Comparison of deep lamellar keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty for lattice and macular corneal dystrophies. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142:304-309.
25. Silva CA, Schweitzer de Oliveira E, Souza de Sena Junior MP, et al. Contrast sensitivity in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2007; 62:705-708.
26. Noble BA, Agrawal A, Collins C, et al. Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK): visual outcome and complications for a heterogeneous group of corneal pathologies. Cornea. 2007; 26:59-64.