Analgesic and antiemetic requirements after minimally invasive surgery for early cervical cancer: A comparison between laparoscopy and robotic surgery

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 1355-1359

  Soliman, Pamela T ^a   Langley, Ginger ^a   Munsell, Mark F ^a   Vaniya, Hemang A ^a   Frumovitz, Michael ^a   Ramirez, Pedro T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIEMETIC AGENT; KETOROLAC; MORPHINE;

ADULT; AGED; BODY MASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; ROBOTIC SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADENOCARCINOMA, CLEAR CELL; ADULT; AGED; ANALGESICS; ANTIEMETICS; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84875216651     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2681-z     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. M Canis G Mage A Wattiez, et al. 1990 Does endoscopic surgery have a role in radical surgery of cancer of the cervix uteri? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 19 921 1:STN:280:DyaK3M7hs1WntQ%3D%3D
2. CR Nezhat MO Burrell FR Nezhat, et al. 1992 Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection Am J Obstet Gynecol. 166 864 865 1532291 1:STN:280:DyaK387pslKltQ%3D%3D
3. PT Ramirez BM Slomovitz PT Soliman, et al. 2006 Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience Gynecol Oncol. 102 252 255 16472844 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.013
4. F Nezhat A Mahdavi NP Nagarsheth 2006 Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy using harmonic shears J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 13 20 25 16431319 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.08.011
5. NR Abu-Rustum ML Gemignani K Moore, et al. 2003 Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy using the argon-beam coagulator: pilot data and comparison to laparotomy Gynecol Oncol. 91 402 409 14599873 10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00518-3
6. A Gil-Moreno O Puig MA Perez-Benavente, et al. 2005 Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 12 113 120 15904613 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.016
7. BM Sert VM Abeler 2006 Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection-case report Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 27 531 533 17139995 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28jgt1Wntw%3D%3D
8. JF Boggess PA Gehrig L Cantrell, et al. 2008 A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy Am J Obstet Gynecol. 199 357.e1 357.e7 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.058
9. B Sert V Abeler 2007 Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now? Int J Med Robot. 3 224 228 17924449 10.1002/rcs.152 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2snhtVOqtQ%3D%3D
10. JF Magrina RM Kho AL Weaver, et al. 2008 Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy Gynecol Oncol. 109 86 91 18279944 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.011
11. A Maggioni L Minig V Zanagnolo, et al. 2009 Robotic approach for cervical cancer: comparison with laparotomy: a case control study Gynecol Oncol. 115 60 64 19638333 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.06.039
12. PT Soliman M Frumovitz CC Sun, et al. 2011 Radical hysterectomy: a comparison of surgical approaches after adoption of robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology Gynecol Oncol. 123 333 336 21872911 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011. 08.001
13. M Frumovitz R dos Reis CC Sun, et al. 2007 Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer Obstet Gynecol. 110 96 102 17601902 10.1097/01.AOG.0000268798. 75353.04
14. YJ Chen PH Wang EJ Ocampo, et al. 2011 Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial Obstet Gynecol. 117 906 912 21422864 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31820c666a
15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Adult cancer pain guidelines, version 2.2011. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician-gls/pdf/pain.pdf. Accessed Oct 2011.
16. A Fagotti C Bottoni G Vizzielli, et al. 2011 Postoperative pain after conventional laparoscopy and laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) for benign adnexal disease: a randomized trial Fertil Steril. 96 255.e2 259.e2 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.04.006
17. JL Walker MR Piedmonte NM Spirtos, et al. 2009 Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group study LAP2 J Clin Oncol. 27 5331 5336 19805679 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.3248