Training strategies for mitigating the effect of proportional control on classification in pattern recognition-based myoelectric control

Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 76-83

  Scheme, Erik ^a   Englehart, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

EMG; myoelectric control; pattern recognition; proportional control; prostheses

Indexed keywords

EID: 84875201738     PISSN: 10408800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/JPO.0b013e318289950b     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bottomley AH. Working model of a myoelectric control system. In: Proceedings International Symposium on the Application of Automatic Control in Prosthetics Design, Belgrade, Yugoslavia, 1962.
2. Herbets P. Myoelectric signals in control of prostheses. Acta Orthop Scandinavica 1969;124(suppl 3):83.
3. Dorcas DS, Scott RN. A three-state myoelectric control. Med Biol Eng 1966;4:367-372.
4. Finley RR, Wirta RW. Myocoder studies of multiple myocoder response. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1967;48:598.
5. Hogan N, Mann R. Myoelectric signal processing: optimal estimation applied to electromyography, part 1: derivation of the optimal myoprocessor. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1980;27:382-395.
6. Evans H, Pan Z, Parker P, Scott R. Signal processing for proportional myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1984;31:207-211.
7. Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, et al. Myoelectric forearm prostheses: state of the art from a user-centered perspective. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:719-738.
8. Gordon K, Ferris D. Proportional myoelectric control of a virtual object to investigate. Exp Brain Res 2004;159:478-486.
9. Sears H, Shaperman J. Proportional myoelectric hand control: an evaluation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:20-28.
10. Jiang N, Vest-Nielsen J, Muceli S, Farina D. EMG-based simultaneous and proportional estimation of wrist /hand dynamics in unilateral trans-radial amputees. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2012;9:42.
11. Muceli S, Farina D. Simultaneous and proportional estimation of hand kinematics from EMG during mirrored movements at multiple degrees-of-freedom. Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2012; 20:371-378.
12. Nielsen J, Holmgaard S, Jiang N, et al. Simultaneous and proportional force estimation for multifunction myoelectric prostheses using mirrored bilateral training. Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:681-688.
13. Oskoei M. Myoelectric control systemsVa survey. Biomed Signal Process Control 2007;2:275-294.
14. Scheme E, Englehart K. EMG pattern recognition for the control of powered upper-limb prostheses: state of the art and challenges for clinical use. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:643-660.
15. Lock B, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Real-time myoelectric control in a virtual environment to relate usability vs. accuracy. Presented at the Myoelectric Controls Symposium, August 17-19, 2005, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.
16. Scheme E, Fougner A, Stavdahl Ø, et al. Examining the adverse effects of limb position on pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Paper presented at: Conference Proceeding of the 32nd annual conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, August 31-September 4, 2010, Buenos Aires, Argentina, vol. 32, pp 6337-6340.
17. Fougner A, Scheme E, Chan A, et al. Resolving the limb position effect in myoelectric pattern recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2011;19:644-651.
18. Hargrove L, Englehart K, Hudgins B. The effect of electrode displacements on pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, August 30-September 3, 2006, New York, pp 2203-2206.
19. Hargrove L, Englehart K, Hudgins B. A training strategy to reduce classification degradation due to electrode displacements in pattern recognition based myoelectric control. Biomed Signal Process Control 2008;3:175-180.
20. Young A, Hargrove L, Kuiken T. The effects of electrode size and orientation on the sensitivity of myoelectric pattern recognition systems to electrode shift. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58-59: 2537-2543.
21. Simon A, Stern K, Hargrove L. A comparison of proportional control methods for pattern recognition control. Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, August 30-September 3, 2011, Boston, MA, pp 3354-3357.
22. Hudgins B, Parker P, Scott RN. A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993;40:82-94.
23. Corbett E, Perreault E, Kuiken T. Comparison of electromyography and force as interfaces for prosthetic control. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48:629-642.
24. Englehart K, Hudgins B. A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2003; 50:848-854.
25. Scheme E, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Selective classification for improved robustness of myoelectric control under non-ideal conditions. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:1698-1705.