Conflict between place and response navigation strategies: Effects on vicarious trial and error (VTE) behaviors

Learning and Memory

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 130-138

  Schmidt, Brandy ^a,b   Papale, Andrew ^b   Redish, A David ^b   Markus, Etan J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; CONFLICT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS STRIATUM; DECISION MAKING; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; HIPPOCAMPUS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LEARNING; MAZE TEST; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORBITAL CORTEX; PLACE PREFERENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REWARD; SELF CONCEPT; TASK PERFORMANCE; VICARIOUS TRIAL AND ERROR;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DECISION MAKING; HIPPOCAMPUS; LEARNING; MALE; MAZE LEARNING; MENTAL PROCESSES; NEOSTRIATUM; NERVE NET; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 84875199807     PISSN: 10720502     EISSN: 15495485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/lm.028753.112     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bett D, Allison E, Murdoch LH, Kaefer K, Wood ER, Dudchenko PA. 2012. The neural substrates of deliberative decision making: Contrasting effects of hippocampus lesions on performance and vicarious trial-and-error behavior in a spatial memory task and a visual discrimination task. Front Behav Neurosci 6. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00070.
2. Blumenthal A, Steiner A, Seeland K, Redish AD. 2011. Effects of pharmacological manipulations of NMDA receptors on deliberation in the Multiple T task. Neurobiol Learn Mem 95: 376-384.
3. Buckner RL, Carroll DC. 2007. Self projection and the brain. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 49-57.
4. Devan BD, White NM. 1999. Parallel information processing in the dorsal striatum: Relation to hippocampal function. J Neurosci 19: 2789-2798.
5. Gardner RS, Fleming SE, Uttaro MR, Suarez DF, Adams AG, Ascoli GA, Dumas TC. 2011. Sequential task demands affect place and response strategy recruitment on a modified plus-maze. In 2011 Neuroscience meeting planner, abstract program no 611.04. Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC.
6. Gruber AJ, McDonald RJ. 2012. Context, emotion, and the strategic pursuit of goals: Interactions among multiple brain systems controlling motivated behavior. Front Behav Neurosci 6. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00050.
7. Hassabis D, Kumaran D, Vann SD, Maguire EA. 2007. Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104: 1726-1731.
8. Hu D, Amsel A. 1995. A simple test of the vicarious trial-and-error hypothesis of hippocampal function. Proc Natl Acad Sci 92: 5506-5509.
9. Hu D, Xu X, Gonzalez-Lima F. 2006. Vicarious trial-and-error behavior and hippocampal cytochrome oxidase activity during Y-maze discrimination learning in the rat. Int J Neurosci 116: 265-280.
10. Jacobson TK, Gruenbaum BF, Markus EJ. 2012. Extensive training and hippocampus or striatum lesions: Effect on place and response strategies. Physiol Behav 105: 645-652.
11. Janabi-Sharifi F, Hayward V, Chen CSJ. 2000. Discrete-time adaptive windowing for velocity estimation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Tech 8: 1003-1009.
12. Johnson A, Redish AD. 2007. Neural ensembles in CA3 transiently encode paths forward of the animal at a decision point. J Neurosci 27: 12176-12189.
13. Johnson A, Varberg Z, Benhardus J, Maahs A, Schrater P. 2012. The hippocampus and exploration: Dynamically evolving behavior and neural representations. Front Hum Neurosci 6: 216. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00216.
14. Muenzinger KF. 1938. Vicarious trial and error at a point of choice. I. A general survey of its relation to learning efficiency. J Genet Psychol 53: 75-86.
15. Muenzinger KF, Gentry E. 1931. Tone discrimination in white rats. J Comp Psychol 12: 195-206.
16. O'Keefe J, Nadel L. 1978. The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
17. Packard MG. 1999. Glutamate infused posttraining into the hippocampus or caudate-putamen differentially strengthens place and response learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96: 12881-12886.
18. Packard MG, McGaugh JL. 1996. Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 65: 65-72.
19. Packard MG, Cahill L, McGaugh JL. 1994. Amygdala modulation of hippocampal-dependent and caudate nucleus-dependent memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 30: 8477-8481.
20. Papale AE, Stott JJ, Powell NJ, Regier PS, Redish AD. 2012. Interactions between deliberation and delay-discounting in rats. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 12: 513-526.
21. Redish AD. 1999. Beyond the cognitive map: From place cells to episodic memory. MIT Press, Cambridge, M.A.
22. Schmidt B, Jacobson TK, Markus EJ. 2009. Hippocampal and striatal dependent navigation: Sex differences are limited to acquisition. Horm Behav 56: 199-205.
23. Tolman EC. 1938. The determiners of behavior at a choice point. Psychol Rev 45: 1-41.
24. Tolman EC. 1939. Prediction of vicarious trial and error by means of the schematic sowbug. Psychol Rev 46: 318-336.
25. van der Meer MAA, Redish AD. 2009. Covert expectation-of-reward in rat ventral striatum at decision points. Front Integr Neurosci 3: 1-15.
26. van der Meer MAA, Redish AD. 2010. Triple dissociation of information processing in dorsal striatum, ventral striatum, and hippocampus on a learned spatial decision task. Neuron 67: 25-32.
27. van der Meer MAA, Kurth-Nelson Z, Redish AD. 2012. Information processing in decision-making systems. Neuroscientist 18: 342-359.
28. Voss JL, Warren DE, Gonsalves BD, Federmeier KD, Tranel D, Cohen NJ. 2011. Spontaneous revisitation during visual exploration as a link among strategic behavior, learning, and the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108: E402-E409.
29. Whishaw IQ, Mittlema G, Bunch ST, Dunnet SB. 1987. Impairments in the acquisition, retention and selection of spatial navigation strategies after medial caudate-putamen lesions in rats. Behav Brain Res 24: 125-138.